Defense Rocks!How Colorado's fielding wizardry will change baseball forever.
Posted Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2007, at 2:21 PM ET
Baseball is usually seen as a clash between pitchers and hitters—a test of wills between the guy on the mound and the slugger at the plate. The defense, on the other hand, is praised and scorned in extreme circumstances, glimpsed only in the final few moments on Baseball Tonight, and all but ignored when sportswriters call upon team management to find nirvana by signing Johan Santana or Alex Rodriguez. But if there's ever a time to focus on the guys with gloves, it's the 2007 World Series. This year's Colorado Rockies are perhaps the greatest defensive team in baseball history. It's even possible that their defensive prowess will change the way the game is played and the way teams are constructed.
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponIn 2003, Michael Lewis' Moneyball showed how Oakland Athletics General Manager Billy Beane used statistics to find undervalued players. Back then, these were typically guys like Scott Hatteberg who drew walks to keep innings going. By the time Lewis published the book, the secret was out and the art of plate discipline was no longer undervalued. Beane and other smart GMs around baseball had already moved on to the next great statistical frontier: defense.
Colorado seems like an odd laboratory to experiment with a team built around defense. The team plays at Coors Field, which sits a mile above sea level. High altitudes mean less break on pitches. Hard-hit balls travel farther because of the thin air, and when they don't go for home runs, they typically land in the stadium's spacious outfield. (Coors Field has the deepest fences in all of baseball.) In 2002, Joe Sheehan on Baseball Prospectus wrote that "the physics issues may preclude anyone from being a good defender at altitude."
In retrospect, though, Coors Field was the perfect place to probe the value of defense. The team has tried pretty much everything else since hiring GM Dan O'Dowd in 1999. O'Dowd has studied weather patterns, tried out a humidor to control scoring, and toyed with a four-man pitching rotation. Much of O'Dowd's work, such as research into the type of pitcher it would take to conquer Coors, resulted in bone-headed decisions like investing nearly $175 million in Mike Hampton and Denny Neagle. The team continued to lose, attendance fell, and the Sporting News belittled the club in 2002, saying they were "trotting out Plan G, or maybe it's Plan H."
Whatever plan they're on now, it's working. The Rockies enter this year's World Series with one of the least-experienced pitching staffs ever to reach the championship round. These pitchers struck out the third-fewest batters of any staff in baseball, walked the ninth-fewest batters, and—with an assist from Coors Field's ballyhooed humidor—kept home runs from being too much of a problem. In other words, the pitchers pitched to contact, daring opposing batters to put the ball into play.
The result?
The team tied the National League record for the fewest errors in a season (68) and set the Major League record for the highest fielding percentage (.989). But those statistics, seized on by some sportswriters, are only part of the story. Advances in fielding stat-keeping, helped along by the post-Moneyball search for the next great undervalued asset, make the Rockies' defensive achievements look even better. Only four teams in baseball had better revised zone ratings—a figure used to measure the proportion of balls hit into each fielder's immediate vicinity that are successfully converted into an out. Only four infields were better at capturing out-of-zone balls. The Rockies' outfield was spectacular at grabbing flyballs and line drives hit to them, and average at capturing everything else, a feat that's more impressive than it sounds, considering the spaciousness of the ballpark.
Then, there was Colorado's rookie shortstop Troy Tulowitzki, who may single-handedly change the game of baseball. According to Win Share stats—invented by Bill James to capture a player's value by translating performance during each play into a share of the team's success or failure—the shortstop contributed about 3.5 wins to the Rockies based on his glovework alone. (Tulowitzki earned 10.9 Win Shares from his fielding. Each Win Share is worth one-third of a team win.)* The second-best fielder in either league had a relatively paltry seven and a half. Tulowitzki has excellent range (he was responsible for a position-leading 87 outs that were outside his zone this year), a bazooka arm (his 561 assists led the majors), and phenomenal quickness. No shortstop in baseball turned more double plays.
Did the Rockies build a great defense consciously, or did they just get lucky after failing with big sluggers and high-priced pitchers? Much of the team's core, including Tulowitzki and MVP candidate Matt Holliday, were drafted and developed by the organization. Teams will always recognize the value of guys who can both rake and play defense like Holliday and Tulowitzki. More impressive are the trades the team made to supplement its home-grown talent. Would other organizations have the guts to trade their best pitcher for a slick-fielding center fielder like Willy Taveras, or take a chance on a solid gloveman like Kaz Matsui, who was a gigantic flop with the bat in New York? And, of course, not every team would stay steadfast and hold onto a cost-effective, defensively gifted prospect like Tulowitzki if quick salvation beckoned.
No matter whether the Rockies lucked out or hatched a brilliant organizational plan, every other team in baseball will see that they rode a great defense to the National League pennant. During the offseason, those teams will consider what they need to do to find success in 2008 and beyond. Many teams will identify pitching as their primary need. The top free-agent pitchers this offseason are Carlos Silva (4.31 career ERA) and Kyle Lohse (4.82). Neither are savory options.
Before spending big bucks on a mediocre pitcher, some teams will perhaps consider the Rockies' success—how the team allowed 54 fewer runs than the year before, despite having a low-budget roster and a ho-hum pitching staff that struck out very few batters. In baseball, it's often said that pitching wins championships. But a mile above sea level, a team from Denver is fielding another approach.
Correction, Oct. 24, 2007: This piece originally misstated the value of Win Shares, a baseball statistic invented by Bill James. Each Win Share is worth one-third of a team win. (Return to the corrected sentence.)
Did the NYT Just Call Joe Biden the Second Most Powerful Vice President Ever?
Meet the TV Genius Behind Jon & Kate, Table for 12, and the Duggars
Does the Health Reform Bill Really Restrict the Rights of Gun Owners?
The Facebook 50: These Companies Really Know How To Use Social Media
Would Sen. Obama Approve of President Obama's Afghanistan Plan?
How Roald Dahl's Stories for Children Eclipsed His Fiction for Adults
Remarks from the Fray:
Proclaiming the Rockies the best defensive team ever is, shall we say, just a tiny little bit over the top. Among other things, you might want to provide a comparison to some other great defensive teams, rather than making blanket assertions.
Consider, for instance, the Baltimore Orioles of the late 1960s and early 1970s, with Brooks Robinson, Mark Belanger and Paul Blair, who collectively won 22 Gold Gloves from 1967 to 1975, plus two different second basemen (Davey Johnson and Bobby Grich) who won 6 more between them. Robinson holds the record for the most Gold Gloves won by any player (tied with two pitchers), Belanger is 4th on the all-time list for shortstops and Blair is tied for 6th among outfielders.
Or, you might want to ponder the mid-1980s Cardinals, which featured Ozzie Smith (13 Gold Gloves), Willie McGee (3) and Andy Van Slyke (5), plus Terry Pendleton (3) and, for a time, Keith Hernandez (11), who often is thought of as the best defensive first baseman ever. You might remember Ozzie as the guy who figured out how to make a throw reach first quicker by bouncing it, and Hernandez as the guy who perfected the throw to second on a sacrifice bunt.
There are many other examples, of course. That's why it would be nice to have seen even the briefest explanation of why this team could be the best defensive team ever other than that they catch more balls in Coors than the average team.
I'd also be a bit more patient about suggesting that the Rockies' emphasis on defense could change the game. For one thing, if the Red Sox win the Series, GMs are likely to draw the opposite conclusion, particularly if Ramirez turns out to be a key player. For another, a one-time event generally is not enough to change anyone's mind. After all, if the Rockies had lost even one more game in September, they wouldn't be here now.
--randy-khan
(To reply, click here.)
(10/24)