The Borowski UltimatumThe Indians are four wins away from the World Series. Do they have the guts to dump their closer?
Posted Thursday, Oct. 11, 2007, at 3:41 PM ET
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponThe Indians, however esteemed, are also the League Championship Series club most likely to be second-guessed if the bullpen fails this month. No other team will be scrutinized for using the wrong closer—Papelbon, Valverde, and Corpas have dominated for virtually the entire season. But Borowski, despite leading the American League in saves, is arguably no better than the Indians' third- or fourth-best reliever. His aforementioned 5.07 ERA is by far the worst in major league history among 40-save relievers.
So, what is Cleveland thinking? Given the conventional presumption that the ninth inning carries special anxiety, Borowski gives the Indians a defense to the criticism they received late last year for lacking an "established" closer—i.e., a reliever who has saved a lot of games in prior seasons, irrespective of his qualitative performance. But the Indians have succeeded elsewhere by bucking unenlightened orthodoxy even in the face of public pressure. In 2002, the team traded fan favorite Bartolo Colon for a package of prospects that included Sizemore. And unlike many of its better-heeled rivals, Cleveland has smartly resisted the perennially inflated market for veteran free agents. Given this track record, the continued employment of Joe Borowski seems atypical.
It's possible to conjure substantive reasons for Borowski's job security. Decisive game situations often occur before the ninth inning, and there the Indians will rely on a better reliever. Perhaps it's better to reserve Borowski for the end of the game than to hold back a superior pitcher when a bases-loaded jam arises in the seventh inning. If Betancourt and Perez put out the fires in the seventh and the eighth, Borowski gets to start fresh in the ninth. He may get hit hard, but if he survives more often than not, perhaps it's more knack than luck.
Boston, however, will solve the same substantive problem by bringing in Papelbon, its closer and best reliever, as early as the eighth inning. Remember, too, that assigning relievers well-defined, predictable roles helps a club maintain bullpen stability through the marathon regular season, whereas the high stakes of playoff baseball will tempt any club to sell its soul for a win that night. And don't worry about hurting Borowski's feelings—he's only signed through the end of this season.
All may end well for the Indians. It did in Game 4 of the Division Series, when Borowski gave up one home run (and nearly a second) with a three-run ninth-inning lead after Betancourt breezed through the eighth. But what if the ALCS comes down to this: Cleveland nursing a one-run lead in the ninth inning of Game 7, with David Ortiz and Manny Ramirez getting set to bat. Do the Indians stay with Rafael Betancourt, risking the pennant on a guy who's not used to pitching the ninth, or do they pull him in favor of their established closer, risking the pennant on a substandard pitcher? I'm guessing the Red Sox, at least, want the Indians to stick with baseball convention. That means sticking with Joe Borowski.
The Tea Party Protesters Are Getting Smarter
Lithwick: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Trial Is a Lousy Place To Examine the Legality of Torture
Who Is Mrs. Cohen From Hadera, and Should Israelis Care Where She Puts Her Money?
What Wired, Esquire, and Hooters Magazines Think You Should Give for Christmas
Save the Planet. Eat More Brie.
How Easy Is It To Hike Into Iran Accidentally?
Remarks from the Fray:
Closers are the most overrated of baseball pitchers. The Save is the most overrated of baseball statistics. Obviously, living in New York, one sees the value of a good closer such as Mariano Rivera. But do not let that blind you. The closer mostly has to pitch one inning. If your team is ahead by 3 runs, then you can afford to give up one run a good portion of the time. Cleveland's best two relievers come out early. If they shut down the opposing team, then the closer can afford to be not as strong. Is it an experiment? Yes. Has it really been done before? Not this deep in the playoffs. I'm itching to see it happen.
--torgo
(To reply, click here.)
For one good reason they stick with Borowski and don't slot in one of the Rafaels, see the Fausto Carmona experiment. This year, he's a Cy Young candidate, a 19-game winner who's at times unhittable. Last year, he was the same pitcher trying to close out games and an all-around mental mess.
In addition to leading the league in saves, Borowski's also a known mental commodity when it comes to closing out games.
--scpars
(To reply, click here.)
I am amused when I see sportswriters make the comment that the Indian's bullpen is better than the Sox'. Chris has made the same mistake.
Comparing the team relief pitching stats, the Red Sox are better than the Indians in every meaningful category: ERA (3.1 vs 3.75), WHIP (1.2 vs 1.3); OBA (.226 vs .254). I'm not sure how the misconception came about but I've been reading and hearing it every day. Here's to hoping the Indians believe it, too!
--pborgm
(To reply, click here.)
(10/13)