Available Jones, M.D.What if all patients could be seen on the day they call?

Remarks from the Fray:

I think this vastly oversimplifies the problems associated with getting an appointment to see a doctor. I am a child psychiatrist. There is an estimated need for about 12,000 child psychiatrist by 2020, but there will only be about 8,000 practitioners. I see the effects in my own practice on a daily basis, where the wait to see me is about 3 months, and I struggle to have a follow up of even an abbreviated time in 2 months. Same day scheduling would not be practical, as I need information from schools and therapists.

In addition, I find the restaurant example to fall apart (or perhaps to support my views?). Locally, most restaurants do not take reservations. When I show up at dinner time, there is often a wait of several hours, which discourages people from staying. Perhaps in urban settings with a greater variety of choices in both restaurants and physicians, this analogy holds better, and maybe medical access could be simplified. But for now, the restaurants don't do any better at getting me access to food than I do at providing access to treatment. In both cases, I think the solution is to have more providers, a task not easily accomplished when the training period for child psychiatry at least is 13 years of post-high school education.

--dberne

(To reply, click here.)

I am getting the impression while reading this article that the author has a somewhat simplified idea of how a medical office functions. Patients do not queue up for doctor visits the way one queues up for concert tickets or roller coaster rides. The vast majority of patients schedule appointments several days or even weeks in advance to accommodate their own busy schedules. They know that they have time on Thursday afternoons to see the doctor and they make an appointment accordingly. A smart patient does not call on Thursday morning to get seen the same day because they run the risk of there not being an opening and having to reschedule on a workday.

I think that the real reason waits in physician offices can be quite long is that it is often very difficult to predict how long a particular patient's visit will last and the schedule will be pushed back accordingly. A patient who comes in with an "ear infection" may take five minutes, twenty minutes, or even hours of attention. The patients scheduled afterward are going to be delayed. Also, a fair number of patient arrive late and are still accommodated. Open access scheduling will do nothing for that.

--enterdoc

(To reply, click here.)

It always amuses me when people try to make analogies between medicine and other kinds of commerce. It shows a profound lack of understanding how different the practice of medicine is from, say, the travel industry. I don't just show up at the airline counter and expect to fly that day.

If you show up to the Hilton and there are no rooms in the Inn, Hilton says, sorry about your luck. They are not legally obligated to house you, whereas doctors are (failing to do so is called abandoning the patient). If all that is available is a single and you want to house your family of 4, too bad, take it or leave it. Try shortchanging a patient because she is shoehorned into an inappropriately short office visit. Hilton Hotels don't shut down for several days because their is an a shortage of employees at the Marriot and everyone leaves to go help (read: hospital emergencies).

So the smart consumer makes a reservation (especially at high utilization time.) What the Hilton does is have (some) excess capacity (some of the time,) The walk in will end up paying top dollar if he gets into the hotel at all. Try that with Medicare patients and you'll be doing time in prison.

I agree that open access CAN work, but it works best for those practices where the needs are usually acute (pediatrics), predictable in time utilization (many primary care offices) and most of the visits do not be set up at an interval.If I know I need to recheck a cancer patient in 6 months, why not schedule it now, for six months from now?

--Stop-truth-decay

(To reply, click here.)

I know this one. I'm a rural solo practice doctor. I have patients call my cell phone to make appts. I see nearly all of my established patients same day. I have daily walk ins which are by definition same day. Also, I am a published researcher on certain mathematical simulations.

The article used the term 'doctors' only later breaking the term down into doctors seeing people for diseases whose course is days (primary care and colds) vs. months (dermatologists) and implicitly including others with very long courses (neurologists). The pattern of disease is not comparable.

For primary care, the instance of disease and patient visits follows an extremely non-gausian distribution. Infections are epidemic. Each individual 'flu' goes from not being present at all to hitting everyone. Weather causes chronic lung disease to flair in the entire susceptible population on the same day. Distribution of patients needing drug refills is mal-distributed by schedules of holidays and pay cycles.

As 'doctors' is an overly broad term, 'patient' is equivalently imprecise including as it does, those waiting for a signature and those waiting taking a complex history including not only looking up all of the patient's clinical data, but also the newest literature on her medications and conditions and their interactions. Setting aside the very small number of complex patients into the future, as a backlog, prevents a logjam for the entire office. The distribution of patients and number of hours in the day becomes less uniform and less predictable and less regimented as efficiency and frankly, medical care improves.

--drugdoc

(To reply, click here.)

(9/5)