Slate's Bizbox
politics: Who's winning, who's losing, and why.

With Friends Like MittYou might want to get a dog.

By John Dickerson
Posted Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2007, at 5:50 PM ET
Larry Craig. Click image to expand.

After hearing about Larry Craig's arrest, Mitt Romney ran from his former Idaho campaign chairman as if he'd been in the next stall. "Once again, we've found people in Washington have not lived up to the level of respect and dignity that we would expect for somebody that gets elected to a position of high influence," the former Massachusetts governor told Larry Kudlow on Tuesday. "He's no longer associated with my campaign, as you can imagine." When asked similar questions after the news broke, most of Craig's Senate colleagues demurred, saying they wanted to see all the facts before commenting. They might have been acting out of loyalty or might have wanted to avoid the topic of bathroom sex altogether. But Romney showed no such reticence, linking Craig—who denies he did anything improper—to Bill Clinton and Mark Foley, and the larger culture of corruption in Washington. (Though Romney said he wanted to wait for the facts before calling for Craig's resignation, he could only draw that parallel by assuming the worst).

As soon as the Craig story broke, the Romney campaign restricted access to Craig's video endorsement on YouTube, in which the Idaho Senator praises Romney for his "very strong family values." Candidates treat endorsers-gone-bad the way Soviet leaders handled purged rivals: erase them from photos and never speak of them again. John McCain did this when the Florida co-chairman of his campaign was also arrested for soliciting sex in a bathroom (if Democrats do this, too, they're better at hiding it). So did Rudy Giuliani when his South Carolina chairman was indicted for distributing coke.* Romney's spokesman said they yanked the video because they didn't want Craig's troubles to become a "distraction." But when Romney later sermonized against Craig to make a sweeping judgment about Washington, he was hardly avoiding the subject.

This may make sense politically. Romney has been working hard to court social conservatives, including running a television spot in Iowa promising to clean up the culture of "violence, indolence, sex, and perversion." His call for a stricter public morality shows members of the religious right—particularly any who might have qualms about his Mormon faith—that he shares their values.

By taking this wide stance, Romney continues to stake his position in the larger debate over the Republican Party's identity. Some Republicans argue that the party should stop stressing family values so much. Lawmakers are human, and ultimately they won't be able to live up to the standard that Romney has articulated. If the GOP candidates didn't go on at such length about morality, their colleagues' inevitable lapses would not look so glaringly hypocritical.

There's also a case that the party needs to worry more about its libertarian wing.

Nick Gillespie, the editor of Reason, seized on the Craig affair to make a version of this argument in the Los Angeles Times, where he said that the GOP should get back to its fundamental principles as articulated by Barry Goldwater. Republicans should stop trying to tell people what to do in their bedrooms and bathrooms, either by stinging a Singing Senator or passing an amendment banning gay marriage. This drew criticism from the National Review's John Hood, who argued that Gillespie had misappropriated the memory of Barry Goldwater. "I'm going to go out on a not-very-long limb here and suggest that if Sen. Goldwater was still around," wrote Hood, "he'd be urging Craig to take personal responsibility for the disrepute he has brought upon himself and the Senate."

We don't have to guess about what Goldwater would do. During the 1964 presidential campaign, he faced almost precisely the same issue. In October, the Goldwater campaign learned that Walter Jenkins, LBJ's closest aide, had been arrested on a "morals charge" in the YMCA bathroom. According to J. William Middendorf's account of that campaign, A Glorious Disaster, Goldwater's aides wanted to use the scandal against Johnson, who was well ahead in the polls. Jenkins was not only a security risk—open to blackmail— but long before he was arrested, there were allegations he'd used his influence with then-Vice President Johnson to get an Air Force general who had been busted on a morals charge reinstated. The Goldwater aides even tried out slogans: "Either way with LBJ." Goldwater insisted that they make no use of it. The story never came up during the campaign.

This may say more about Goldwater's personal decency than it does about his governing philosophy. Jenkins had served in Goldwater's Air Force Reserve Unit, and as Goldwater later wrote, "It was a sad time for Jenkins' wife and children, and I was not about to add to their private sorrow. Winning isn't everything. Some things, like loyalty to friends or lasting principle, are more important." Mitt, you're no Barry Goldwater.

Correction, Aug. 30, 2007: This article originally and incorrectly said Giuliani's South Carolina chairman was indicted for selling cocaine. He was merely indicted for distributing it. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
John Dickerson is Slate's chief political correspondent and author of On Her Trail. He can be reached at .
Photograph of Sen. Larry Craig by Chris Kleponis/Getty Images. Photograph of Mitt Romney on Slate's home page by Jeff Haynes/AFP/Getty Images.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Remarks from the Fray:

Most politicians end up doing this sooner or later, but the republicans seem to have a rash of it lately, what with the spate of sex scandals. Both Mitt and McCain have had to drop campaign aids caught being "naughty, naughty boys" to quote Craig's statement about Clinton in the 1990s.

If the GOP hadn't spent the last 30 years positioning themselves as the morals police, perhaps they wouldn't be so open to charges of hypocrisy when they get caught with their hands in the cookie jar (or in another man's stall). I realize that America is a moralistic society, but there's also a strong undercurrent of MYOB as well. Perhaps if people spent less time worrying about what path their neighbors were taking on their way to hell and more on their own problems, we'd have less divisiveness in this country.

I know, I know, that means the administration's water carriers would have to give up their obsession with Clinton's wanky and that's never going to happen.

--Greatbear452

(To reply, click here.)

Mr. Dickerson has it exactly right when he contrasts Goldwater's sense of personal decency to Romney's shallow moralistic trumpeting.

This is the whole problem with the Republican fascination with family values. They're not about real families, but about families as the religious fundamentalists believe they ought to be. Everyone ought to live in a suburban, two parent household where Dad works and Mom stays home to raise the children. They should be active in Little League, Girl Scouts, PTA, Chamber of Commerce and, above all, the church. Okay, the synagogue, if you insist, but not the mosque, never the mosque.

Of course, most of the moralizers are on their second and third marriages, having folded in the face of temptation. Alcoholism and drug use, extramarital affairs, teen pregnancies, abortion (!), crimes of various sorts and homosexuality are just as common in the bible belt as anywhere else.

Whatever these family values might be, they're not helping the people who are promoting them so vigorously for the rest of us. We're doing no worse, and they're doing no better, when it comes to raising kids, keeping our marriages together, being good citizens, etc. Which makes one wonder why they're so very, very insistent about legislating these "family values" into the nation's civil code. Could it be they're just trying to use the power of government to force everyone else to believe what they believe?

--Arlington

(To reply, click here.)

(9/1)

Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Over the Line
Harold Ford Jr. | I know what it's like to be smeared by your opponent.
: The Positive in Negative Ads
PLUS » Milbank: The President's Lullaby