The Larry Craig Bust

Remarks from the Fray:

Now I'll readily admit, cruising in a mens room for willing partners to partake in some illicit nasty-nasty isn't my idea of a good Saturday night activity - even if I am spending a layover in Minnesota.

But I won't fault Senator Craig for trying, hey if that's how you get your jollies, who am I to try and stop you (unless of course I happen to be responsible for cleaning said restroom)?

I might even go so far as to actually believe that he was only picking up a piece of paper. Hey some of us have long legs, and we have to put our feet somewhere, why not spread 'em?

But I refuse to give this man any sympathy. He pleaded guilty. Sure, I know, he claims to have done it in an effort to "keep things quiet," but this man is a Senator for crying out loud! If there's anything that the masses love more than a salacious sex story, it's a salacious sex story involving closeted gay Republicans. It was bound to break one way or another, and pleading guilty is not the right way to "keep it under wraps." It's probably the worst thing he could have done.

Once he made that guilty plea, he lost every right he had to play the victim. Had he fought the arrest, he would have had any number of excuses ready in his back pocket, several of which would have found a willing audience. Overzealous cops, a rampant press campaign out to smear his good name. He could have made it bipartisan by wondering very loudly what the use is in having laws that forbid people from making overtures to consensual sex (What's next, one might ask, asking a girl at a bar if she wants to go home with you?). Even the "who the fuck knew that tapping another guy's foot while sitting on the crapper is considered lewd and disruptive" defense would have stuck, for some anyways.

Now the rabid hoards get to salivate over the schadenfreude of a family values man caught allegedly soliciting sex from another man, AND the increasingly bizarre spectacle of watching this man try and explain not only why he was in that bathroom, but why he plead guilty in the first place.

He might have an abnormally large poo-stance, he might have dropped a secret government invisible piece of paper, but in proclaiming publicly and on the official record that he committed lewd and disruptive acts, he now has to explain away why he exhibited such a gross miscalculation of judgment - both in the bathroom stall and in the police station.

--analogboy490

(To reply, click here.)

(8/29)

• Cohen: How an Economic Crisis Is Like a War
• Froomkin: How's Bush? Put a Fork in Him.
• Milbank: A House Divided Along Twisted Lines
• Robinson: Ugly Politics at Justice | Q&A