HOME / foreigners: Opinions about events beyond our borders.

Moroccan RouletteWhat happens if you hold an election and nobody comes?

(Continued from page 1)

Ultimately, despite its progress, Moroccan democracy remains a shadow game: Democratic institutions have little substantive authority, and citizens' preferences, as expressed at the ballot box, rarely have much impact on government policy. The citizen alienation that results threatens to undermine the credibility of the nascent democratic process.

There are forces in Morocco ready and eager to take advantage of the voters' increasing disaffection. In addition to the Islamist party that is running for parliament, another Islamist group, the banned Justice and Charity Association, labels the elections useless and demands an end to the monarchy. Even worse, homegrown Islamist terrorism has increased, notwithstanding the efforts of Morocco's efficient domestic security services, flush with U.S. funding and training. The 2004 Madrid train bombings, almost certainly carried out by Moroccans, are perhaps the most notorious example, but in 2007 alone three Moroccan suicide bombers have detonated themselves in the country's tourist-filled cities, including one on Aug. 13.

The Moroccan business elite, currently enjoying a surge of investment in tourism and real estate and benefiting from free-trade pacts with the European Union and the United States, are clearly worried that extremists will benefit from the public's disaffection. A group of Casablanca's most distinguished entrepreneurs founded a new nonprofit, 2007 Daba, dedicated to persuading Moroccans to vote. Their slick voter guides, posters, and TV ads are everywhere. For their part, government officials worry about attacks on polling stations, but worry too that a police presence visible enough to deter suicide bombers will likely intimidate voters. So, they must choose between high security and high voter turnout.

Fundamentally, though, the biggest decisions rest with the king. To engage voters he will have to strengthen parliament and the mainstream political parties, giving them a real capacity to act on voters' concerns and reducing his own power in the process. If he chooses not to fortify parliament, he faces the risk that voters may abandon their faith in the democratic process and turn to more dangerous and destabilizing alternatives. If the Islamist PJD does as well in the elections as some expect, King Mohammed will also have to choose between asking his most threatening opposition to form a government—an unprecedented move for a major Arab country—and delegitimizing democracy by excluding them from power.

The king's difficult choices suggest there are limits to Washington's preferred strategy for democratic progress in the Arab world: a top-down, gradual process guided by a reliably friendly but reform-minded autocrat. Erecting the forms of democracy without much substance, a balance now well-developed in Morocco, may not ultimately win the loyalty of Arab citizens. And if democratic forms lose legitimacy, then tightly managed liberalization, far from ensuring stability in a dangerous environment, may end up pushing Arab societies away from peaceful politics altogether and further into the arms of extremists. That's a kind of voting with one's feet that we should work to avoid.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Tamara Cofman Wittes is a senior fellow in the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution. Her book Freedom's Unsteady March: America's Role in Building Arab Democracy will be published in 2008.
Photograph of King Mohammed by Adelhak Senna/AFP/Getty Images.
COMMENTS

Remarks from the Fray:

Erich Fromm comments in The Forgotten Language: An Introduction to the Understanding of Dreams, Fairy Tales and Myths, the psychological and sociological reasons the Jews of Exodus were not allowed to enter the Promise Land was they would be unable to adapt to the new freedoms; they were slaves, not only because they were under the rule of others, but because they also had learned to think of themselves as slaves. The Exodus generation had no way to expunge from themselves what they were existentially. This held true for the Moses and his generation and it holds true for many citizens of emerging democracies.

Many of the people who made for peaceful and semi-peaceful revolutions in East Europe (a.k.a. Soviet satellites) have allowed or called for less than democratic leadership for which they strove. Russia hoisted Boris Yeltsin onto their shoulders and demanded freedom for all, but without any leaders who truly understood freedom and democracy, the people and the nation stumbled. Now they have a rather strong (dictatorial?) leader in President Puttin, and while they have lost much freedom, they seem more contented than when they were freer. Muslim countries will have to go through the same apoplexy; the current generation that has known nothing but strong and unyielding authoritarianism will have to die away before a new generation will be able to bring freedom and democracy to fruition.

Morocco is one of these countries. The current administration is correct in supporting King Mohammed VI gradual transition to democracy. No party, not the people, the government, nor the monarchy are ready to make a clean break from the past, but with guidance, they can move closer to the ideals of freedom and true democracy. In time, with great efforts and expenses, monetary and moral, the seeds of justice, freedom, capitalism and democracy can be spread throughout the Muslim and Arab territories. We cannot, as seen in Iraq, simply free a people and expect them to find their way without a strong (but temporary) hand to guide them. If we fight for freedom, we must be prepared to nurture that freedom. Once we win the war, logic and experience demand that we are prepared to maintain the peace. Before we press fresh wine, we must clear the vineyard of old grapes. The process is not an easy one, but once it is brought to fruition, all are better for the effort.

--IMKessel

(To reply, click here.)

(8/27)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
Very superstitious.90/091113_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on unemployment.50/091113_TC.jpg
Streep 2.0-8.0. 1/122939/2183724/DoonesburyPlaceholder.jpg