medical examiner
columns
- Womb Raider
Do future health problems begin during gestation?
Darshak Sanghavi
posted Oct. 10, 2008 - Still in the Lyme Light
Politicians and Hollywood enter the debate over "chronic Lyme disease."
Kent Sepkowitz
posted Sept. 30, 2008 - The Allure of the One-Stop Shop
The real reasons why people go to the E.R. when they shouldn't.
Zachary F. Meisel
posted Sept. 12, 2008 - Quicker Liquor
Should we lower the legal drinking age?
Darshak Sanghavi
posted Aug. 26, 2008 - Organ Failure
Doing battle with the National Kidney Foundation.
Sally Satel
posted Aug. 15, 2008 - Search for more medical examiner articles
- Subscribe to the medical examiner RSS feed
- View our complete medical examiner archive
Sunny DazeIs tanning addictive? Does sunscreen really help prevent skin cancer? And other burning summer questions.
By Amanda SchafferPosted Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2007, at 2:51 PM ET
Amanda Schaffer was online on Aug. 16 to chat with readers about this article. Read the transcript.

This summer, science is grappling anew with the burning, beguiling power of the sun. Three investigations worth watching (from under a big leafy tree) focus on whether exposure to ultraviolet light is potentially addictive; why using sunscreen does not seem to be associated with a lower risk of melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer; and whether sun protection can come in pill form. All of which may influence what kind of sunscreen you buy, what else you do to protect yourself—and, arguably, why it feels so good to soak up those dangerous rays in the first place. A rundown:
1) Is ultraviolet light addictive?
A fundamental question in sun science is why we go on basking like lizards despite the obvious risks. Researchers have long suspected a connection between UV exposure and natural "feel good" molecules called beta-endorphins, which are also released during exercise. But for years, the evidence was ambiguous, as some scientists looking for it failed to find an endorphin surge in peoples' blood following exposure to ultraviolet light.
Last year, however, the field warmed up, so to speak. Steven Feldman, a dermatologist at Wake Forest University, gave eight frequent tanners a drug called naltrexone, which blocks the body's opioid receptors. These are sites in the body and brain where endorphins, as well as drugs like morphine and codeine, may attach. Feldman found that on naltrexone, half of the frequent tanners showed signs of withdrawal, like nausea and jitteriness, whereas none of the infrequent tanners did. He argues that with their opioid receptors blocked, the tanners "were deprived of their UV fix," because they'd developed a chemical dependency on the light.
David Fisher of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston thinks there may be an evolutionary rationale for the sun's draw. Maybe the endorphin release offered an adaptive advantage by reducing the pain associated with sunburn, or encouraged people living at high latitudes to spend time in the sun and thus avoid vitamin D deficiency. This spring, Fisher and his colleagues happened on a molecular connection between UV light, tanning, and endorphin release. In a paper published in March in Cell, they reported that UV damage directly causes the production of beta-endorphin in the skin.
No one knows exactly how this endorphin release might trigger chemical dependency—the molecules may or may not reach the bloodstream. But the door is now wide open to molecular sleuthing. Meanwhile, some indoor-tanning fans are also touting the endorphin findings, since it seems to prove chemically that tanning feels terrific (even as it kills you).
2) Does sunscreen protect against melanoma?
Epidemiological evidence suggests that sunscreen helps prevent squamous cell carcinoma, one of the less lethal forms of skin cancer. But the findings don't hold true for melanoma (subscription required), the really scary kind of the disease, which appears to be rising at a fast rate. In a couple of studies, sunscreen was actually correlated with higher melanoma risk.
Remarks from the Fray:
When it comes to cause and effect... has any one thought about doing tests on the sunscreens to see if they are imparting cancer causing agents on the skin? Perhaps the reason skin cancer is going up is because the use of sunscreens is going up...dah... it is worth looking into.
Also, what about all those tribesmen that wear very little and are in the sun much of the time? There is also apparently a link between people that burn and cancer risk vs. just exposure alone.
--Randy1111
(To reply, click here.)
(8/16)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: Satan, Dark Harbinger Of Wickedness, Afflickts Townsfolk With String Of Ploughing Mishaps
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: A Most Drunken John Adams Makes The Promise To "Put" Man Upon The Moon
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
PostPartisan: The DebateRobinson | Punch, Counterpunch
Gerson: Two McCain SuccessesKing: Straight Out of a SitcomMeyerson: Old John
- Dionne: Who Is John McCain, Really?
- Ignatius: In Praise of Complete Sentences
- Parker: Wake Me When the Debate Starts
- Editorial: Their Pre-Meltdown Mind-Set
- Today's Headlines
- What America's Smartest Women Say About Sarah Palin
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:46:41 GMT - Personal Finance: Conservative Investing
Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:53:19 GMT - Linda Ellerbee: The Kids Are All Right
Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:33:13 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Breaking News: It's Racism
Thu, 9 October 2008 0:59:42 GMT - Kind of Blue at 50
Fri, 3 October 2008 17:36:27 GMT - To Be Nina
Thu, 2 October 2008 3:50:27 GMT - » More from The Root

medical examiner













