For gamers weaned on the original Nintendo Entertainment System, Contra occupied a special spot in the cartridge lineup. The impoliticly named shoot-'em-up of the late 1980s featured two Stallonenegger protagonists armed with "spread" guns and tasked with kicking tail in the Central American jungle. With hours of fast-paced action and cooperative play, Contra was an NES sensation. But there was a hitch: The game was so difficult to complete that most players had to cheat.
Punch a now-iconic series of commands into your controller (up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A), and the Contra gods would boost your lives from three to 30, more than enough to blast a path to the final boss. Dubbed the Konami Code, after Contra's Japanese publisher, the secret sequence was one of gaming's first great "cheats" and helped inspire a tradition of semisanctioned cheating that is still flourishing today. In the new Transformers game, a similar sequence (up, down, left, right, up, up, down) gets you unlimited ammo. And the Konami Code itself still works in recent titles like Quake 4.
But as games have grown in complexity, so has cheating. Massive online games such as EverQuest and Final Fantasy involve thousands of strangers playing simultaneously, striving to obtain virtual assets that have real-world value (by some estimates several billion dollars' worth). Cheating in these games can be at once harder to identify and more troubling.
While the Konami Code had the whiff of the illicit about it, the code was programmed into the game cartridge. The only people you were cheating were the pixilated bad guys and, perhaps, yourself—out of the experience of beating the game without all those extra lives. Compare Contra with World of Warcraft, the 9-million member online game, where a hue and cry has ensued over the practice of gold farming, in which players, many of them Chinese, earn virtual gold through drudging labor (by killing the same monster over and over again, for example). The farmers then sell their gold to lazy players, many of them American, who use it to acquire coveted weapons and armor they don't have the time or dedication to earn the hard way.
Most gold farmers haven't hacked the game. They're only doing what any player could do, given the time and inclination. But their efforts foul up the game's economy, and Blizzard Entertainment, the company behind World of Warcraft, has banned tens of thousands of them.
So, where does gameplay end and cheating begin? Given that virtual property now has real-world value, it's no longer just an idle question for gaming geeks. These days, there's enough nerdy talk about social contracts, democracy, and deontology in games to wear out a Lyceum. Much of it centers on the ethos of the gamer, who by nature—and indeed by nurture—is a subversive creature. He hunts for shortcuts and trapdoors. He looks for ways to bend the rules. It has been this way for as long as mischievous designers have written software for rebellious kids. Which is to say: forever. Or nearly so.
In 1978, Warren Robinett, a recalcitrant Atari 2600 game designer, squirreled the first widely known "Easter egg" into the first action-adventure game (appropriately titled "Adventure"). Fed up with the lack of credit given to programmers, Robinett turned a single gray pixel in the middle of a gray wall into a portal to a secret room, where his name appeared in bright colors.
Robinett's naughty pixel started a trend. Other designers, toiling anonymously in the video game trenches, began seeding games with secrets, a way to put a personal touch on their work. Before long, Easter eggs had transformed into full-blown cheat codes that unlocked bonus characters, special levels, and superpowers. The first cheaters in games were the people who made them.
Luke O'Brien is a freelance writer in Washington, D.C.
Illustration by Robert Neubecker.
Remarks from the Fray:
Part of the blame (if we are into assigning such) must lie with the game designers. Many of these games rely on the players performing boring, repetetive tasks for some reward. Is there any question that players are going to attempt to find ways to circumvent these uninteresting elements of the game?
--Egaeus
(To reply, click here.)
It does not seem to be mentioned anywhere that cheat codes are necessary for game designers to test the games. The people who write these games are far from the greatest players, and it's helpful to have some extra protection to get through to all the parts of the game.
--rsswier
(To reply, click here.)
Obviously online communities like World of Warcraft, Ultima, etc. are technically games. They're fun, full of magical creatures, and largely involve going on adventures to kill hidious monsters and collect treasure. But, as the article states, when you attach real-world monetary value to that sweet new battleaxe, your pile of Gold, or your ability to summon ice storms, things get sticky.
Logically, when you are in a competetive situation in which the outcome will determine whether or not your wallet has the potential to grow fatter or not - you're gambling. Now I fully understand that many, if not most players of these games don't give a hoot about how much they could pawn their enchanted Orc helmets for, but then again, those folks probably wouldn't be as concerned about cheaters (it would amount to just another part of the game). But there are obviously plenty of folks out there who do make bank after selling leveled-up characters, or worse, stealing other people's loot.
If you are at all concerned about dollars, its technically gambling, not gaming. I have no problem with gambling. But usually, there are very strict rules in place and an army of security to keep people in line and the cheaters out. That isn't what happens in online gaming, primarily because the creators figured that most players would play for fun, and not mix the real and fake economies. Thus, my advice; play for fun, not for profit, and consider cheaters just another in-game enemy to tangle with.
--jwschmidt
(To reply, click here.)
Perhaps the biggest flaw in the design of games like Everquest and WoW is that you have to install the game on your computer, which is also responsible for keeping track of some of your stats, which get uploaded after every interval. This is understandable considering how much computing power is required to run these types of games so naturally you may want to spread out the cost more evenly to the players. Well, the downside of outsourcing your processing to the gamers-- who have a stake at the outcome, is pretty obvious.
If you make it my responsibility to keep track of my location, my hit points, my mana, along with several other nerdy stats and do that a million times over, eventually some of these gamers will be hackers who will find where these int values are located. That probably explains how one can leap all the way across the board in less than a second or never die.
To make a sports analogy, that's like hosting a golf tournament where everybody has to keep their own score with no or little double checking from other players or the officials. Gee, I wonder what could go wrong.
As for "gold mining", thats probably the game makers fault too for making the game so boring that you don't do anything productive. Shame on the makers for not putting some quota on how many exp you can derive from a single source or how long you can be logged on per day.
Comparing cheating in online games verses super contra in this article was also lame because in contra, those "cheat codes" were put in the game on PURPOSE by the makers. This article also fails to point out that PC games tend to be more cheatable than consoles, where you would have to physically break into hardware. At least outsourcing the processing to consoles isn't as risky as doing so with a PC.
--senbassador
(To reply, click here.)
The main reason the average WoW player hates gold farmers really has nothing to do with their presence. Most fellow players I've talked to are either pretty much apathetic about it, or feel sorry for them. What we DO hate is the fact that they constantly spam our chat interfaces with advertisements for their gold selling services... sometimes so badly that it becomes difficult to play. Blizzard has been taking steps to make it harder for them to advertise, though, and it's becoming less of an issue. Thanks to a patch a few months ago, in two button clicks the spammer is both reported for spamming, and ignored by my interface.
They don't seem to really do much to the economy, because the majority of high-end items can only be acquired by visiting high-end dungeons personally, or personally playing in the various PVP arenas and battlegrounds (they are "soulbound", which means your character can't trade them). If anything, the flooding of gold on the market which might cause inflation, tends to be balanced by the flooding of raw crafting materials on the market (a main source of gold farmer gold) which causes a drop in the value of goods anyway.
--fel
(To reply, click here.)
(8/16)
What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUpon
Happy Birthday, Smokey Bear
Are Gas Grills More Eco-Friendly Than Charcoal Ones?
He-Man: Briefs of Rage and Other Toy-Inspired Movies We're Dying To See
Kaus: Seven Possible Theories Explaining Palin's Resignation
The U.S. Embassy in Djibouti Cordially Invites You to a Fourth of July Cookout
The Week's Best Editorial Cartoons
Remarks from the Fray:
Part of the blame (if we are into assigning such) must lie with the game designers. Many of these games rely on the players performing boring, repetetive tasks for some reward. Is there any question that players are going to attempt to find ways to circumvent these uninteresting elements of the game?
--Egaeus
(To reply, click here.)
It does not seem to be mentioned anywhere that cheat codes are necessary for game designers to test the games. The people who write these games are far from the greatest players, and it's helpful to have some extra protection to get through to all the parts of the game.
--rsswier
(To reply, click here.)
Obviously online communities like World of Warcraft, Ultima, etc. are technically games. They're fun, full of magical creatures, and largely involve going on adventures to kill hidious monsters and collect treasure. But, as the article states, when you attach real-world monetary value to that sweet new battleaxe, your pile of Gold, or your ability to summon ice storms, things get sticky.
Logically, when you are in a competetive situation in which the outcome will determine whether or not your wallet has the potential to grow fatter or not - you're gambling. Now I fully understand that many, if not most players of these games don't give a hoot about how much they could pawn their enchanted Orc helmets for, but then again, those folks probably wouldn't be as concerned about cheaters (it would amount to just another part of the game). But there are obviously plenty of folks out there who do make bank after selling leveled-up characters, or worse, stealing other people's loot.
If you are at all concerned about dollars, its technically gambling, not gaming. I have no problem with gambling. But usually, there are very strict rules in place and an army of security to keep people in line and the cheaters out. That isn't what happens in online gaming, primarily because the creators figured that most players would play for fun, and not mix the real and fake economies. Thus, my advice; play for fun, not for profit, and consider cheaters just another in-game enemy to tangle with.
--jwschmidt
(To reply, click here.)
Perhaps the biggest flaw in the design of games like Everquest and WoW is that you have to install the game on your computer, which is also responsible for keeping track of some of your stats, which get uploaded after every interval. This is understandable considering how much computing power is required to run these types of games so naturally you may want to spread out the cost more evenly to the players. Well, the downside of outsourcing your processing to the gamers-- who have a stake at the outcome, is pretty obvious.
If you make it my responsibility to keep track of my location, my hit points, my mana, along with several other nerdy stats and do that a million times over, eventually some of these gamers will be hackers who will find where these int values are located. That probably explains how one can leap all the way across the board in less than a second or never die.
To make a sports analogy, that's like hosting a golf tournament where everybody has to keep their own score with no or little double checking from other players or the officials. Gee, I wonder what could go wrong.
As for "gold mining", thats probably the game makers fault too for making the game so boring that you don't do anything productive. Shame on the makers for not putting some quota on how many exp you can derive from a single source or how long you can be logged on per day.
Comparing cheating in online games verses super contra in this article was also lame because in contra, those "cheat codes" were put in the game on PURPOSE by the makers. This article also fails to point out that PC games tend to be more cheatable than consoles, where you would have to physically break into hardware. At least outsourcing the processing to consoles isn't as risky as doing so with a PC.
--senbassador
(To reply, click here.)
The main reason the average WoW player hates gold farmers really has nothing to do with their presence. Most fellow players I've talked to are either pretty much apathetic about it, or feel sorry for them. What we DO hate is the fact that they constantly spam our chat interfaces with advertisements for their gold selling services... sometimes so badly that it becomes difficult to play. Blizzard has been taking steps to make it harder for them to advertise, though, and it's becoming less of an issue. Thanks to a patch a few months ago, in two button clicks the spammer is both reported for spamming, and ignored by my interface.
They don't seem to really do much to the economy, because the majority of high-end items can only be acquired by visiting high-end dungeons personally, or personally playing in the various PVP arenas and battlegrounds (they are "soulbound", which means your character can't trade them). If anything, the flooding of gold on the market which might cause inflation, tends to be balanced by the flooding of raw crafting materials on the market (a main source of gold farmer gold) which causes a drop in the value of goods anyway.
--fel
(To reply, click here.)
(8/16)