HOME / books: Reading between the lines.

Günter Grass, ReconsideredWhat does Peeling the Onion reveal?

Peeling the Onion by Günter Grass.When Günter Grass was 12, the SS stormed the Polish Post Office in Danzig, his birthplace. Grass' uncle, a postman who took part in its defense, was executed by the Germans. Grass no longer was allowed to play with his cousins, nothing was said at home about the excommunicated relatives or their fate, and a frightened child learned to look the other way, not to ask why. He would be 31 and a celebrated author before he had the courage to make a visit to the postman's mother, who would greet him with a nonjudgmental "Ginterchen! My, how you've grown!"

Regardless of the mea culpas Grass injects throughout Peeling the Onion, his new memoir, a furor erupted in Germany when Grass revealed in it that he had concealed for half a century that he had served in the Waffen-SS at 17. Until that time, Grass had symbolized the postwar moral rehabilitation of Germany. In 1970 he had stood with his friend Chancellor Willy Brandt when Brandt, in a historic gesture, had knelt down at the site of the Warsaw Ghetto. Danzig had made Grass, who had won a Nobel Prize, an honorary citizen. In 1985, on the 40th anniversary of V-E day, he had insisted that the Waffen-SS soldiers buried at Bitburg cemetery didn't deserve to be honored by Reagan and Chancellor Kohl. In retrospect, this insistence looked more like a cover-up than an excess of moral vigor.

Peeling the Onion, despite the gifted writing, is maddening. It suffers from omissions; the very cagey Grass seems to want it both ways. On the one hand, when convenient, Grass presents his autobiographical narrator as a know-nothing adolescent who refused to see what is happening in the outside world. On the other, young Günter, the well-read A-student in history and gifted would-be artist and writer, is portrayed as a shrewd survivor with agile street smarts. (He attributes his rapid moves up after his time as a prisoner of the American Army, including his emergence as the star of the postwar literary Group '47, to happenstance.) Like many a presumed rebellious bohemian, he thinks left and eventually marries right: His future wife Anna Schwarz, a student of modern dance, is the daughter of an upper-class Swiss father, who buys the couple a modest house near the Gare du Nord in Paris. Grass starts to write The Tin Drum.

In this memoir, written half a century later, Grass continues to view his early novel's protagonist, Oskar, the dwarf tin drummer, as if he were alive, and the author of the book. "He gave me leave to put everything which lay claim to truth between question marks. … So I must confess I find it difficult to sound out my past for demonstrable facts. … As a publicly acknowledged protagonist he insists on his birthright. … Oskar must always be first. Oskar knows all and tells all, Oskar laughs at my porous memory." But Oskar is a mere fictional conceit who runs off to the circus, whose piercing shrieks are meant to be anguished protests against the war, while, as we now know, the real Günter Grass cheerfully joined the elite Jörg von Frundsberg Division of the Waffen-SS.

In Crabwalk, the short novel that preceded his memoir, Grass had a double aim: to engage in a generational struggle with young Germans who found his sort of fractured symbolism, breathy sex, and depiction of a West Germany corrupted by American materialism outdated, and to prepare the way to reveal his wartime service. But he repeatedly sidesteps the burden of individual responsibility, invoking in its place abstractions about the German psyche and German history. This is troubling for at least two reasons. First, both his creation "Oskar" and his insistence on German collective guilt are evasions—if everyone is guilty, then no single person is. Yet Grass' lie about his service in the Waffen-SS was an individual, not a collective, act. Second, Grass has claimed that until now the suffering Germans experienced during the war (at the novel's epicenter is the Russian sinking in 1945 of the Wilhelm Gustloff, a German cruise ship in which 9,000 civilians were drowned) was "impossible to discuss openly." This is a partial truth. Heinrich Böll's fiction is permeated with soldier and civilian suffering.* In 1948 the big hit in Europe was Roberto Rossellini's devastating film Germany Year Zero about a destroyed population and country. Alain Resnais' Hiroshima Mon Amour released in 1959, several years before The Tin Drum was published, is sympathetic to the young German soldier trapped in a war. The questionable massive bombing of Dresden has been an open topic since the end of the war.

Grass' unnecessary lie about his own service impeded, most of all, these many years, his own use of precious firsthand material. Grass' account in Peeling the Onion of the bewildered young soldier stumbling about to dodge the advancing "ivans," death and carnage around him, so evocative of All Quiet on the Western Front, is superb. (Grass cherished Remarque's novel. His family, not realizing it was on the Nazi index of forbidden books, had kept their copy. In the 1960s Grass made a pilgrimage to the aging Erich Maria Remarque in his villa on Lago Maggiore.) It had to have been especially hard for an ambitious young writer to suppress what could have been his war novel, who early on dreamed of great heroic battles, of writing the "big book"—as has every writer who has lived through war, and some, like Crane, who have not, from Tolstoy to Joseph Roth to Heinrich Böll to Claude Simon, Hemingway, and Norman Mailer.* I found particularly affecting—I myself spent time in France and Germany after the war—the simply told scene when the young soldier (Grass) carrying home beet syrup and a kilo of butter is reunited with his family. Danzig has been destroyed; they are living a minimal existence in another town. This is the Germany forever in my mind's eye: a place where many people are starving, the cities were rubble and there was constant cold and people milled about in railroad stations trying to find their lost relatives.

My sense is that Grass isn't so haunted by what he actually did—which wasn't that heinous, and as a soldier he never fired a shot in his limited time in the Waffen-SS—soldiers do shoot in battle—but by the lethal anti-Semitism he grew up with. In quick strokes he admits that he and his family were Nazis, but the mature Grass does not in his look backward reflect on the nature of anti-Semitism, a subject Gregor von Rezzori wrote of so brilliantly and ruefully in Memoirs of an Anti-Semite.* Grass, proud that he was always anti-bourgeois, never explains that under the Nazis, being against the bourgeoisie meant that you were a good Nazi. In other words, it didn't mean being a 1960s counterculturist; it meant being against what was perceived as the Jewish control of the cultural and financial establishment. To a young outsider dreaming of becoming an artist or writer, of achieving what must have seemed to have been an impossible successful career goal, Jews were in the way, and the Nazis the glamorous ticket to success.

If the Holocaust is absent in The Tin Drum and only stiffly alluded to in the memoir, Grass has nonetheless lectured his fellow Germans, if to a fault, on the horrors of Auschwitz. And the sections of his memoir on his wartime service are brilliant. But perhaps a writer, particularly one with his outsized ambitions and talents, should not have so heeded the siren song of wanting to be all things to all people—great writer, the moral and political conscience of a country, and globe-trotting intellectual. The danger with so many mixed ambitions is that the center, like the evasive center of an onion, does not always hold.

Correction, July 2, 2007: This piece originally misspelled the names Heinrich Böll and Gregor von Rezzori. (Return to the first corrected sentence.)

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Barbara Probst Solomon, author of six books including Arriving Where We Started, is the U.S. cultural correspondent of El Pais and currently the distinguished visiting professor of Menendez y Pelayo University at Santander, Spain.
COMMENTS

Remarks from the Fray:

This was one of the more measured and considerate pieces on this subject I've read--a little late to the debate, but perhaps that's as it should be, having let the dust settle a bit around Herr Grass's surprising revelation.

What seems to be lacking here is any sort of conclusion on the subject. Are we to despise Grass now? Does his late-life revelation render him guilty of unforgivable hypocrisy?

I don't know. I can certainly understand how a young man--even one as piercingly intelligent and self-aware as Gunter Grass--could make rash and regrettable decisions--hiding his history with the SS; joining up with the Nazis in the first place--and yet still evolve into an adult of firm moral convictions, even if he lacked the courage to own up to all of his indiscretions, whether out of guilt or, as this piece implies, to enhance and then protect his literary reputation. It certainly seems arguable that Grass has been disturbingly cagey and manipulative from the start. It also seems possible that he was burdened with a guilty conscience that drove him to become an outspoken self-flagellator on behalf of the German people without giving him the fortitude to fully confess his own, personal culpability.

And, of course, like all novelists whose great works tackle the big moral and historical themes, Grass is not immune to criticism of his own private morality, nor of the complicated relationship between literary ambition and moral conviction. Grass wrote 'The Danzig Trilogy' to expose and critique the moral failures of the German people, true, but he also wrote for fame and personal glory; all writers do, even if they refuse to admit or acknowledge it.

Ultimately, I think we have to admit that perhaps the greatest weakness of a fiction writer is an imperfect memory. People who specialize in imagining things are naturally going to imagine a past that absolves them of the sins they don't wish to be held to account for. A 30 year-old writer dreaming of worldwide fame and glory is going to have an easier time omitting certain sins from his biography than a 75 year-old facing death and coming to terms with his reputation and his self-made myth.

Finally, episodes like this should remind us that--even when an author, like Grass, chooses to take on the role of public intellectual based on her/his literary achievements--the moment the book is presented to the audience, it is set loose from the author, like a child from a parent. It stands alone. 'The Tin Drum' and the Danzig Trilogy as a whole aren't any less brilliant because their creator was an imperfect man--even if he chose to uphold himself as a moral exemplar. Furthermore, while Grass himself may have been somewhat hypocritical, his words and thoughts as a public intellectual still ring true. As the parents often say to the children, 'do as I say, not as I do.'

--Harrogate

(To reply, click here.)

I still remember the end of WW2 as a young teenager in the US. Since I was not a German kid, I was not likely to be in the military, but I do remember the "atmosphere": we had no Gestapo, nor concentration camps, nor midnight arrests, but I can tell you, if you started talking about how our side might have been killing hundreds of thousands of "innocent" civilians, or any other atrocities, you'd be in trouble.

As the years went by, and the US has drifted into more and more Nazi type activities (torture, killing civilians, "denial" , etc) I am puzzled as to why we are not more sympathetic to the spot most of the Germans were in. My conclusion is that blaming any particular groups for modern war is a waste of time; the situation creates the "morality". If you can get Americans to believe that torture is OK, then it can happen to anyone. What we should be concentrating on is making killing people illegal, with all that implies.

--disigny

(To reply, click here.)

(7/6)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
The end of Prohibition.58/091204_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on Tiger Woods.37/091204_TC.jpg
Eaking-spay in ode-cay.52/091204_TD.jpg