Slate's Bizbox
faith-based: Religion, spirituality, and sacrilege.

Just Say NoahEvan Almighty's appalling effort to pander to religious moviegoers.

By David Plotz
Posted Friday, June 22, 2007, at 5:13 PM ET
Evan Almighty. Click image to expand.

By far the funniest moment in Evan Almighty occurs when God (Morgan Freeman, in full-on magical Negro mode) appears to the wife of Evan Baxter, a congressman turned reluctant ark builder. God tells Joan—yes, "Joan of Ark," get it?—that people "miss the point" of the Noah's ark story because they "think it's about God's anger … I think it's a love story about believing in each other." That's because, God continues, the animals show up in pairs, together, and Noah's family sails off in the boat, together.

Did anyone involved with Evan Almighty actually read the Noah story? You know, the part when God drowns the entire world, when "all in whose nostrils was the merest breath of life, all that was on dry land, died. All existence on earth was blotted out, man, cattle, creeping things, and birds of the sky; they were blotted from the earth." Now, I'm no great religious scholar, but it doesn't take Pope Benedict to see that the Noah story is not a charming little tale about familial love, but a terrifying lesson about our dependence on God: a warning that we are alone in the world and always at the mercy of a wrathful and demanding Lord.

Evan Almighty, a drab retelling of the Noah story as a comic ecofable, is Hollywood's latest and—with a $200 million budget—most expensive pander at the Christian market. Ever since the success of The Passion of the Christ in 2004, studios have been hurling money at Christian directors in hopes they can recapture that Jesus mojo. Evan director Tom Shadyac, a Catholic whose previous God film Bruce Almighty grossed $500 million, recently told Newsday, "There's no bigger Jesus freak in this room than me, 'cause when I was as young as I can remember, having cognition and thought, I was looking at this Jesus guy and going, 'Whoever this is, this is somebody that's blowing my mind.' "

Universal has hired a religious marketing firm to sell Evan Almighty to churches and religious leaders, hoping to capture the same hundreds of millions in Christ dollars raked in by The Passion, The Chronicles of Narnia, and Bruce Almighty. If they succeed, it will be tragic, not because Evan Almighty is unfunny (although it certainly is), but because it will validate Hollywood's embarrassingly stupid approach to religion and faith. If I were a believing man, movies like Evan would make me long for the days when Hollywood just ignored God.

Spoiler alert: If you don't want to know what happens in Evan Almighty, skip this paragraph. I won't rehash much of the plot here—check out Dana Stevens' review of Evan Almighty for a more detailed evaluation—but the gist is that God, angry about how we're despoiling his earth, picks empty-suit Evan (a surprisingly blah Steve Carell) to build an ark. Evan resists, but God's miracles finally beat him into submission. When Evan shaves, his beard immediately grows back; animals follow him—in pairs—everywhere; God materializes in the back seat of Evan's new Hummer. Evan builds the ark, saving all his neighbors when a dam built by a corrupt congressman breaks. The ark floats down to the Capitol building in a mighty flood, somehow not drowning anyone, or even requiring anyone to dog-paddle out of the way. Evan learns that his wife, his three sons, and trees matter more than his McMansion.

You might argue that making a comedy about Noah's ark—one of the Bible's grimmest stories—is a bit like making a sex farce about the Rwandan genocide. But the problem is not the comic aspiration. VeggieTales is proof that Bible comedy based on unpleasant stories is possible. No, what's disturbing about Evan Almighty is its flaccid approach to faith. All that is compelling, moving, and profound about the Noah story has been systematically excised. In the Bible, God chooses Noah to survive because Noah is a righteous man. But Evan is faithless and stupid, and comes to believe in God only because God hammers him over the head with about 137 miracles. Any moron will believe when an omnipotent divine being appears in the back seat of his car and starts sending him pairs of lions and giraffes. The lesson of the Bible is that faith is hard, and unrewarding, and painful. Faith is belief when there are no giraffes.

Shadyac told one early screening of religious leaders that he wants to use the film "to spread the idea of the good news." But Evan Almighty also strips away anything Christian (or Jewish) about the story and replaces it with a message of universal hokum. God's entire instruction to his flock? Practice "acts of random kindness." (Look at the initial letters of that phrase.) That's not religion or even morality. It's a coffee mug slogan. The proof of Evan's redemption is that he starts to like dogs.

I never thought I'd hear myself say this, but Evan Almighty makes me miss The Passion. It was a sadistic, horrifying movie, about a bloody and terrifying book. But Mel Gibson captured the sense of the story, the ideas of suffering and sacrifice that undergird Christianity. Evan Almighty is evidence that Hollywood wants the trappings of faith in movies, but without the substance.

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
David Plotz is Slate's deputy editor. He is the author of The Genius Factory: The Curious History of the Nobel Prize Sperm Bank. You can e-mail him at .
Still from Evan Almighty by Rhythm & Hues © 2007 Universal Studios. All rights reserved. Image of Noah on Slate's home page courtesy Wikipedia.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Remarks from the Fray Editor:

Somewhat astonishingly, Evan Almighty launches a flotilla of good religious conversations in the Faith-Based Fray. Even one of Jehovah's Witnesses stops by for a chat. Don't miss the discussions below the top posts.—G.A.

Remarks from the Fray:

David's argument requires accepting that any unorthodox take on a bible story is inherently disrespectful or insulting to the faithful. But there's no real evidence that the movie is attempting to either promote Christian orthodoxy (there's clearly way too much goofing around to take that argument seriously) or ridicule or trivialize it.

Yes, the movie does imply that God is leveraging the original Noah approach to rouse someone from out of their stupor, but I don't see anything inherently trivializing or demeaning about that.

In missing the point completely (this isn't the Noah story, this is a Noah story) David spends most of the review jerking his knee compulsively on how Evan Almighty apparently isn't a cold reading of the biblical account (duh!), but in the end fails to make a coherent point about why that's a problem, to either Christians or the audience at large.

Bottom line, there's nothing inherently "insulting" or demeaning about a God who takes a dumbass, treats him like the dumbass he is, forces him to get a clue by giving him a higher purpose, and sits back to watch the ensuing fun. Does God really have to go around smiting and drowning the world at all times? Nope... apparently he can come down and mess with one very wayward soul and give him some perspective, too.

The fact that this movie will succeed proves only one thing: that people of a religious bent clearly have more depth and are having more fun than the small cheerless gaggle of atheist-lite newbies who just cracked their new copy of God Is Not Great.

--crunchyfrog

(To reply, click here.)

To hear the Gospel according to David Plotz is like taking a dusty corner of the Sisteen Chapel around to the masses declaring, "See, how can anything beautiful come from this!!!"

Look Dave, I get that you have a very dim view of God's love and mercy - perhaps you've had a very harsh experience with authority in your own life, so it's easy to project that onto God....but don't choose to conveniently overlook all the sin of those inhabiting the earth God chose to destroy: rampant murder, incest, rape, thievery, continuously without ceasing to increase. Any loving parent would put an end to it all and start over.

I appreciate your perspective on keeping Christ in Christian movie making very much. I only hope you see beyond the blood and gore to realize love can be real enough to go all the way for you and me.

--nw316

(To reply, click here.)

In the book of Genesis, God expressly states that he will not cause another flood. Ever. At all. His word to Noah and Noah's family. The proof? The rainbow. God's covenant. Now, as I understand my Scripture, when Jesus became the New Law to replace/fulfill the Old, he did not revoke that covenant. So what the heck is God doing permitting another flood (even a local one like the dam bursting)? Not to limit an omnipotent being, but if you're going to take any myth/story/legend, have the decency to read it first.

I cringe to think of Hollywood attempting a modern telling of the book of Job. God and the Devil quaffing beers together while paddle-warring over a schmuck?

--ferumbas

(To reply, click here.)

To me it sounds like Plotz misreads the normative posture of the film. An "eco-fable" is not going to be "pro-Christian"--an essential plank of green progressive ideology is rejecting and refuting the Old Testament injunction for humans to "be fruitful and multiply" and to exercise unique and unlimited dominion over all flora and fauna, and the very Earth herself. Carell's Noah as heedless, foolish, and unaware--unlike the animals--is thus a perfect Everyman for eco-jeremiads. Morgan Freeman's role--and career, for the most part--exemplifies latter-day progressives bona fides in TV and film production, casting blacks wherever possible in otherwise-generic Positions of Authority, Wisdom, and Influence.

Plotz demonstrates bias against traditional Judeo-Christian religion in his utterly gratuitous use of "pandering", though. A short list of recent Christian-friendly films in the face of almost unremitting hostility over the last few decades does not bring us back to the days of "The Ten Commandments" and "The Bells of St. Mary's", even if there was something wrong with those days to begin with.

--Inkberrow

(To reply, click here.)

(6/23)

Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
A Grand Tour
David Broder | While the stars align for Obama, McCain is looking like the odd-man-out on foreign policy.
Annette Heuser: A Honeymoon
PLUS » Achenblog: The New Capitalism Socialism