press box
columns
- This "Town Hall" Debate Is Neither
It's more a dance recital than an honest head-to-head between the candidates.
Jack Shafer
posted Oct. 6, 2008 - Don't Blame Gwen Ifill If the Veep Debate Sucks
What a stupid format.
Jack Shafer
posted Oct. 1, 2008 - When Wall Street Bet on Elections
"Roosevelt New York Odds Drop to 7 to 5" and other headlines from a century ago.
Jack Shafer
posted Sept. 26, 2008 - McCain Bites the Press
Just because the press loves Obama doesn't mean it hates McCain.
Jack Shafer
posted Sept. 23, 2008 - Bill O'Reilly's "Shut Up" Revisionism
According to the talk show host, he rarely uses the phrase.
Jack Shafer
posted Sept. 19, 2008 - Search for more press box articles
- Subscribe to the press box RSS feed
- View our complete press box archive
Can Murdoch Pass the Stink Test?Assessing the mogul against the standards of the Dow Jones code of conduct.
By Jack ShaferPosted Tuesday, May 29, 2007, at 6:07 PM ET
If insulating Murdoch from the Wall Street Journal is such a great idea, why hasn't he instituted similarly autonomous editorial boards to shield the operations of the New York Post and Fox News Channel from his whims? But that's not the Murdoch way. A Page One story in the Feb. 14, 1994, Wall Street Journal portrays Murdoch as a details-crazed micromanager, reviewing before publication the next day's editorial in his New York Post.
A wordy section of the Dow Jones code of conduct prohibits company employees from accepting money or gifts, either directly or indirectly, from anybody seeking a mention in the pages of a Dow Jones publication. A different code operated at Murdoch's Post until earlier this month when the paper acknowledged that its "Page Six" editor, Richard Johnson, had accepted a $1,000 gift from a restaurateur. Presumably the money was for "play" in the pages of Murdoch's newspaper. The New York Times counts 15 favorable "Page Six" mentions of the restaurateur or his establishment in the two years since the gift-giving.
Once confronted, how did Murdoch's Post clear the ethical air? Don't be dense. Its editor, Col Allen, called the receipt of the gift a "grave mistake," meted out an unspecified reprimand to Johnson, and explicitly banned such future windfalls for employees. But don't blame Johnson and Allen for their ethical laxity. Boss Murdoch sets low standards for the whole company. They merely follow.
Does Murdoch pass the Dow Jones stink test? He's not even qualified to take it.
******
What Murdoch transgressions have I ignored? Send e-mail to . E-mail may be quoted by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise. Permanent disclosure: Slate is owned by the Washington Post Co.)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: New York Threatened By O'er-Crowding As Population Climbs To Twelve Thousands
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: Citizens Are Now Free to Practise Any Form Of Protestantism They Want
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:16:40 -0400 - Historical Archives: Local Black-Smith is Disappointed By Son's Wishes To Be-Come a Wheel-Wright
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:33:20 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Marcus | Forget Biden. I'd like to see McCain face off against Palin.
Toles: Another McCain SurpriseStumped: Where's Palin's Baby?
- Cohen: How an Economic Crisis Is Like a War
- Froomkin: How's Bush? Put a Fork in Him.
- Milbank: A House Divided Along Twisted Lines
- Robinson: Ugly Politics at Justice | Q&A
- Today's Headlines
- Moral Questions for the Presidential Candidates
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:44:27 GMT - How to Protect Yourself Financially--At Any Age
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:46:57 GMT - Cover Story: Sarah Palin's 'Folk' Problem
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:37:19 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Down for the Count
Mon, 6 October 2008 3:05:47 GMT - Wall Street in Black and White
Fri, 3 October 2008 20:36:07 GMT - Death of Black Radio
Mon, 6 October 2008 2:28:00 GMT - » More from The Root

press box













