war stories
columns
- Is Petraeus "Beyond Naive"?
He thinks we should negotiate with our enemies—just like Obama.
Fred Kaplan
posted Oct. 10, 2008 - Obama Won the Foreign-Policy Questions
McCain was vague and contradicted himself during the debate.
Fred Kaplan
posted Oct. 7, 2008 - She Still Knows Nothing
Palin proved that she can speak in complete sentences, but not that she understands anything about foreign policy.
Fred Kaplan
posted Oct. 2, 2008 - Obama Wins on Foreign Policy
He stood up to McCain, and he had a more realistic vision of the world.
Fred Kaplan
posted Sept. 27, 2008 - Afghanistan Isn't Like Iraq
Why a "surge" won't work there.
Fred Kaplan
posted Sept. 19, 2008 - Search for more war stories articles
- Subscribe to the war stories RSS feed
- View our complete war stories archive
House Democrats Back DownThe military budget is as bloated as ever.
By Fred KaplanPosted Thursday, May 10, 2007, at 6:16 PM ET
The closest thing to such a project is President Bush's cherished missile-defense project—a scaled-down version of Richard Nixon's ABM and Ronald Reagan's Star Wars. And, as might be expected, the House panelists did make at least a dent in missile defense—though not a large one, cutting Bush's $9.5 billion request by $764 million, or 8 percent. Still, it is a cut—which is more than any committee inflicted on the program when the Republicans controlled Capitol Hill.
The savings from this cut were transferred to more imminent and practical needs—more body armor and mine-resistant vehicles for soldiers in Iraq, a 3.5 percent pay hike for military personnel (a bit higher than the 3 percent hike that Bush had proposed), and a cancellation of extra user fees for military health care.
Besides missile defense, the House panel dealt a blow to only one other weapons program—the Army's unwieldy, high-tech Future Combat Systems, which it cut by nearly one-quarter, from $3.7 billion to $2.8 billion. The official rationale in the committee's budget report: "The Army has identified bigger, more critical priorities that must be addressed before devoting such large resources to futuristic technologies."
This is mumbo-jumbo code word for the real reason: The Army is the chief beneficiary of the committee's budget increases, so the extra money has to be taken out of the Army's hide. The only big new weapon on the Army's R&D shelf is the Future Combat Systems; therefore, it—and not any Air Force or Navy system—has to take the fall. (Missile defense is run by an independent Pentagon agency, so it can be cut without upsetting the delicate budgetary balance among the services.)
And so, the House committee left unscathed the requests for a new aircraft carrier ($3.1 billion), a new nuclear submarine ($2.7 billion), two new destroyer ships ($3.4 billion), 12 new F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft ($2.4 billion), and numerous other weapons programs that could just as validly have been cut on the grounds that "more critical priorities ... must be addressed."
The budget season is far from over. The House armed services committee only authorizes spending for the Defense Department. The House appropriations committee obligates the actual money. Amendments to both bills can be offered on the House floor. The Senate goes through the same process. Then any disagreements between the two chambers' versions are resolved in a House-Senate conference committee.
Most of the focus this season—and properly so—will be on Iraq, especially on whether funding for the war should be tied to conditions for withdrawing U.S. troops. However, away from the limelight, legislators will deliberate over spending much, much more money for weapons, projects, and dreams that have little or nothing to do with Iraq, Afghanistan, the war on terror, or national security, as the term is generally understood. And as the defense bill moves from one committee and chamber to another, as the lobbyists step into gear, and as the wrangling and trade-offs intensify, this larger budget is likely to grow larger still.
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Man Dives Haphazardly Into Conversation Like Wounded Osprey
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:00:43 -0400 - Law Allows Abandoning Teens
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:30:01 -0400 - Paranoid Kicker Thinks Team Purposely Scored Touchdown So He Couldn't Mess Up Field Goal
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:00:39 -0400 - » More from the Onion
The Final DebateRobinson | McCain Stock Plunges
Meyerson: Angry White ManIgnatius: Presidential PresenceKing: Obama Came Up Short
- Dionne: What Joe the Plumber Can't Fix
- Editorial: The Candidates' Closing Arguments
- Froomkin: Who Isn't Running Against Bush?
- Milbank: The Washington Sketch Drinking Game
- Today's Headlines
- Is Former Terrorist Ayres Rooting for McCain?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:27:42 GMT - Economy: Are We in a Recession or Depression?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:33:58 GMT - Study: Why Food Is Addictive for Some Women
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:46:14 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Deep, Dark Chocolate
Thu, 16 October 2008 16:09:33 GMT - Deep, Dark Chocolate
Thu, 16 October 2008 16:09:33 GMT - The Root's Fall Book List
Tue, 30 September 2008 21:05:56 GMT - » More from The Root

war stories













