fighting words
columns
- Are We Getting Two for One?
Is Michelle Obama responsible for the Jeremiah Wright fiasco?
Christopher Hitchens
posted May 5, 2008 - One Angry Man
Should we worry about John McCain's temper?
Christopher Hitchens
posted April 28, 2008 - Mandela Envy
Is Robert Mugabe's lawless misrule founded in jealousy?
Christopher Hitchens
posted April 21, 2008 - Cardinals' Law
Two questions for the pope.
Christopher Hitchens
posted April 14, 2008 - Obama Is No King
Today, the national civil rights pulpit is largely occupied by second-rate shakedown artists.
Christopher Hitchens
posted April 7, 2008 - Search for more fighting words articles
- Subscribe to the fighting words RSS feed
- View our complete fighting words archive
A Loser's HistoryGeorge Tenet's sniveling, self-justifying new book is a disgrace.
By Christopher HitchensPosted Monday, April 30, 2007, at 11:37 AM ET

It's difficult to see why George Tenet would be so incautious as to write his own self-justifying apologia, let alone give it the portentous title At the Center of the Storm. There is already a perfectly good pro-Tenet book written by a man who knows how to employ the overworked term storm. Bob Woodward's 2002 effort, Bush at War, was, in many of its aspects, almost dictated by George Tenet. How do we know this? Well, Tenet is described on the opening page as "a hefty, outgoing son of Greek immigrants," which means that he talked to Woodward on background. Further compliments are showered upon him. We discover that his main protector on Capitol Hill, Sen. David Boren, who represented Oklahoma until 1994, had implored President-elect Bush to retain this Clinton-era head of the CIA and if he had any doubts, to "ask your father":
When the younger Bush did, the former President George H.W. Bush said: "From what I hear, he's a good fellow," one of the highest accolades in the Bush family lexicon. Tenet … later led the effort to rename CIA headquarters for Bush, himself a former DCI.
No need to draw a very complex picture here: Tenet knows how the kiss-up and kiss-down game is played. And, for a rather mediocre man, he did well enough out of the arrangement while it lasted. Woodward was even willing to describe him as one who "had developed an understanding of the importance of human intelligence, HUMINT in spycraft." But let's not get ahead of ourselves. I only mean to say that it was a very favorably disposed chronicler who wrote this, in describing Tenet's reaction on the terrible morning of Sept. 11, 2001:
"This has bin Laden all over it," Tenet told Boren. "I've got to go." He also had another reaction, one that raised the real possibility that the CIA and the FBI had not done all that could have been done to prevent the terrorist attack. "I wonder," Tenet said, "if it has anything to do with this guy taking pilot training."
Notice the direct quotes that make it clear who is the author of this brilliant insight. And then pause for a second. The author is almost the only man who could have known of Zacarias Moussaoui and his co-conspirators—the very man who positively knew they were among us, in flight schools, and then decided to leave them alone. In his latest effusion, he writes: "I do know one thing in my gut. Al-Qaeda is here and waiting." Well, we all know that much by now. But Tenet is one of the few who knew it then, and not just in his "gut" but in his small brain, and who left us all under open skies. His ridiculous agency, supposedly committed to "HUMINT" under his leadership, could not even do what John Walker Lindh had done—namely, infiltrate the Taliban and the Bin Laden circle. It's for this reason that the CIA now has to rely on torturing the few suspects it can catch, a policy, incidentally, that Tenet's book warmly defends.
So, the only really interesting question is why the president did not fire this vain and useless person on the very first day of the war. Instead, he awarded him a Presidential Medal of Freedom! Tenet is now so self-pitying that he expects us to believe that he was "not at all sure that [he] really wanted to accept" this honor. But it seems that he allowed or persuaded himself to do so, given that the citation didn't mention Iraq. You could imagine that Tenet had never sat directly behind Colin Powell at the United Nations, beaming like an overfed cat, as the secretary of state went through his rather ill-starred presentation. And who cares whether his "slam dunk" vulgarity was misquoted or not? We have better evidence than that. Here is what Tenet told the relevant Senate committee in February 2002:
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Michel Gondry Entertained For Days By New Cardboard Box
Sat, 10 May 2008 01:00:52 -0400 - [audio] India's Top Physicists Develop Plan To Get The Hell Out Of India
Sat, 10 May 2008 01:00:39 -0400 - [audio] Cheney Adds Rare '64 Kuwait To Oil Cellar
Fri, 09 May 2008 01:00:54 -0400 - » More from the Onion
- Today's Opinions
- New Allies In Asia?
Sun, 11 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - The Price of Delay
Sun, 11 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - Keeping New Mothers Alive
Sun, 11 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - » More from washingtonpost.com
- Today's Headlines
- McCain's Convention Chair Worked for Burma's Military Junta
Sat, 10 May 2008 15:27:13 GMT - Baby Names: Does Popularity Affect Choice?
Sat, 10 May 2008 00:14:43 GMT - It’s Fiction—For Real
Fri, 09 May 2008 23:14:05 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Grounded: Conversations on The Root
Wed, 7 May 2008 18:55:35 GMT - Viva Vogue Italia!
Thu, 8 May 2008 18:17:41 GMT - Jazz: On the Cusp of a New Golden Age
Thu, 8 May 2008 15:36:33 GMT - » More from The Root

fighting words









