Slate's Bizbox
the dismal science: The search for better economic policy.

Couch EntitlementSurprise—men do just as much work as women do.

By Joel Waldfogel
Posted Monday, April 16, 2007, at 12:54 PM ET
Illustration by Mark Alan Stamaty. Click image to expand.

Everyone from economists and sociologists to Oprah knows that women work more than men. Their longer combined hours, at the home and at the office, stop men from taking afternoon naps on the couch and cause fights that end with men spending nights on the couch. And yet according to new study, those longer hours are a myth, because it's just not true that women carry a heavier load.

Three economists, Michael Burda of Humboldt University in Berlin, Daniel Hamermesh of the University of Texas, and Philippe Weil of the Free University of Brussels have analyzed data from surveys in 25 countries that ask people how they spend their time. Some of the countries are rich, like the United States and Germany, some are poor, like Benin and Madagascar, and some are in the middle, like Hungary, Mexico, and Slovenia. The people surveyed were asked to fill in diaries indicating how they spend each segment of their day.

The 24 hours we all have each day can be divided into four broad activities: "market work" that is, work for pay, typically outside the house; "homework," including housework and child care; "tertiary time," including sleep, eating, and other biological necessities that people can do only for themselves; and the time left over, which is leisure. Leisure is not essential to survival, but we like it.

Throughout the world, men spend more time on market work, while women spend more time on homework. In the United States and other rich countries, men average 5.2 hours of market work a day and 2.7 hours of homework each day, while women average 3.4 hours of market work and 4.5 hours of homework per day. Adding these up, men work an average of 7.9 hours per day, while women work an average of—drum roll, please—7.9 hours per day. This is the first major finding of the new study. Whatever you may have heard on The View, when these economists accounted for market work and homework, men and women spent about the same amount of time each day working. The averages sound low because they include weekends and are based on a sample of adults that included stay-at-home parents as well as working ones, and other adults.

In Sweden, Norway, and the Netherlands, men actually work more than women, although the differences are small. In Belgium, Denmark, Finland, and the United Kingdom, women work slightly more, though less than 5 percent. Among rich countries, the largest differences emerge in Italy, where women work eight hours while men work only 6.5, and in France, where women work 7.2 hours and men 6.6.

A couple of caveats to all this newfound equality. First, many knowledgeable people believe that women work more. In a survey by the authors of this study, 54 percent of economists and 62 percent of economics students thought that women work more than men, as did more than 70 percent of sociologists. And while the gender equal-work phenomenon has been noted before, "it has been swamped by claims in widely circulated sociological studies … that women's total work significantly exceeds men's," as the authors put it. Although men in many rich countries do not work less than women, they do enjoy about 20 to 30 minutes more leisure per day (over an hour more in Italy) because they spend less time on sleep and other biological necessities. Men spend almost all of this additional leisure time watching television.

VIEW AS SINGLE PAGE
Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Illustration by Mark Alan Stamaty.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Remarks from the Fray:

The numbers would probably change radically depending on how you answer this: When you spend time with your kids, is it leisure or is it work? Does it matter if you're shopping, or what you're shopping for? As children grow older, they need less help and want less interaction, so does leisure increase?

In arriving at this number, someone defined child rearing, either the researchers or the diarists. As my wife tells me, "it's not babysitting when they're your kids". I imagine this kind of survey as impossible. Time spent grocery shopping or on other errands and tasks is home work when I'm alone, and leisure when my kids "help", while my wife has the opposite view.

--Sassafrass

(To reply, click here.)

I notice one very important thing that all of the grandstanding in the article glosses over: an average for a population isn't the same as what individuals experience, because the average is made up of a really wide variation in individuals.

There are a lot of couples out there that have the woman working hard both at work and at home, while the husband lazes around. There are also plenty of couples where the wife is a pampered diva in a similar vein. There's also every shade of gray in-between -- if there's slightly more of gender A individuals doing nothing, the As that do make an effort might work enough extra hours to balance them out. As the saying goes, "'normal' is just the average of a bunch of abnormalities."

All of that together (and I've certainly heard of all of it!) could easily make it look like A and B still work equal amounts, when on an individual level, there's still a lot of disparity. In order to get meaningful results, they'd have to narrow/sort the study to only compare similar couples. For all I know, perhaps they did, with the media only focusing on the "average" data because it's simpler and essentially more controversial.

--kittycalbard

(To reply, click here.)

(4/21)

Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Assessing Sarah Palin
| Newt Gingrich, Grover Norquist, John Podesta and others weigh in.
Colbert King: She's No HillaryEditorial: Is She Ready for This?
PLUS » PostPartisan: Quick Takes from Opinions