explainer
columns
- How Do You Diagnose Autism?
Michael Savage thinks doctors are getting it wrong.
Juliet Lapidos
posted July 22, 2008 - Pre-emptive Presidential Pardons
Can you be pardoned for a crime before you're ever charged?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 21, 2008 - What's a Bank Run?
And how do you get on the FDIC's secret problem list?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 18, 2008 - So Help You, Dog
How does a canine cop become a "sworn officer?"
Brian Palmer
posted July 18, 2008 - Blind Reading
Why would booksellers buy a title without knowing anything about it?
Noreen Malone
posted July 17, 2008 - Search for more explainer articles
- Subscribe to the explainer RSS feed
- View our complete explainer archive
SATs for SoldiersHow hard is the aptitude test for U.S. military recruits?
By Melonyce McAfeePosted Tuesday, April 10, 2007, at 6:27 PM ET
Download the MP3 audio version of this story here, or sign up for The Explainer's free daily podcast on iTunes.
Last week, the Army National Guard lowered its standards for new recruits in 34 states. These states will now be able to enlist those who scored in at least the 16th percentile on an aptitude test. How hard is that test?
It depends on which branch of the military you want to join. The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery includes sections on general science, automotive information, mechanical comprehension, electronics information, and assembling objects. But these scores are only used to determine which jobs a recruit might be good at once he or she enters the military. The ASVAB also includes two math sections and two reading sections, together known as the Armed Forces Qualification Test. If a recruit can't pass the math and reading sections, he or she won't be eligible to enlist.
To join the Army, a recruit must normally score in at least the 31st percentile. The minimum score is 32 for the Marines, 36 for the Air Force, and 35 for the Navy. A recruit's eligibility is also determined by educational background, and scoring exceptions are made. (With forces spread thin, the number of exceptions has risen dramatically in recent years.) But according to federal law, no one who scores below a 10 can enlist in any branch of service.
The military first implemented the AFQT after Congress mandated a standardized recruitment exam in 1948. (The Defense Department added to the basic math and verbal sections to create the ASVAB in the late 1960s.) Prior to that, other branches used their own tests. Until World War II, the Army alone had two versions: Literate, English-speakers took the Alpha test, which measured vocabulary, math, and general knowledge; other recruits got the Beta test, which consisted of diagrams and pictorial tasks ("What's missing from these pictures?") and even running a maze.
The Department of Defense began implementing the ASVAB in high schools throughout the country in 1968; the test officially became the standard recruitment exam for all military branches in the mid-1970s.
The ASVAB has evolved over the years to keep up with technological innovations. For example, you wouldn't see a question asking how to use a vacuum tube on the test today, whereas such a question may have been standard 30 years ago. Nowadays, two-thirds of ASVAB enlistment tests are administered via computer.
Got a question about today's news? Ask the Explainer.
Explainer thanks Don Hill of the United States Military Entry Processing Command, and reader Brian Mosley for asking the question.
Remarks from the Fray:
Back when we were still trying to bring freedom and democracy to Vietnam, people got waivers for all kinds of things -- low test scores, criminal offenses, bad eyes, physical limitations, etc. The recruiters had to meet their goals. Most of these waivers didn't last past recruit training because the deficiency that had to be waived manifested itself in a way that prevented the recruit from finishing boot camp. Except for intelligence, of course.
--Arlington2
(To reply, click here.)
(4/12)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:00:27 -0400- Queen Elizabeth II Announces She's Pregnant Again
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:00:00 -0400 - Ebert and Roeper Leaving 'Ebert and Roeper'
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:00:21 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Iraq on the Horizon| Telnaes:Bush, McCain and Maliki
Boot:Behind Maliki's Games
Meyerson:Obama the Wise
Editorial:Obama the Eccentric
- Richard Holbrooke: Bosnia's Face of Evil
- Robert J. Samuelson: A Depression? Hardly
- Dana Milbank: Still Sorry About Walter Reed
- Michael Gerson: Cindy McCain's Courage
- Today's Headlines
- Can Mugabe Survive Zimbabwe’s New Political Order?
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:31:17 GMT - How the Pine Beetle is Destroying Colorado Forests
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:20:17 GMT - Obama in the Middle East: No Easy Questions
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:15:44 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- When Thugs Cry
Wed, 16 July 2008 18:25:58 GMT - Black in America, Now What?
Tue, 22 July 2008 14:45:43 GMT - Gen Y and the Colorblind Lie
Tue, 8 July 2008 18:14:03 GMT - » More from The Root

explainer









