bad advice
columns
- Cramer vs. Cramer
Will his crazy confession destroy his career?
Henry Blodget
posted March 22, 2007 - The Complete Bad Advice Column
Rotten stock tips and hazardous investment counsel.
Henry Blodget
posted March 22, 2007 - The Market's Crashing! What Should You Do Now?
Um, nothing.
Henry Blodget
posted March 6, 2007 - History Is Bunk
Fund A grew 15 percent a year. Fund B grew 3 percent. Don't be a sucker and buy Fund A.
Henry Blodget
posted Feb. 21, 2007 - Madder Money
Me vs. Jim Cramer, Round 2.
Henry Blodget
posted Feb. 12, 2007 - Search for more bad advice articles
- Subscribe to the bad advice RSS feed
- View our complete bad advice archive
Cramer vs. CramerWill his crazy confession destroy his career?
By Henry BlodgetUpdated Thursday, March 22, 2007, at 10:55 PM ET
Browse the entire Bad Advice series here.

Jim Cramer and I had a bit of a tiff a few weeks ago, so some readers might view this column as just another round in that fight. Others might see it as the pot calling the kettle black, or schadenfreude. Think what you will—but as the author of a column about bad investment advice, I feel compelled to comment on what just might qualify as the worst financial counsel ever offered.
As the New York Post, the New York Times, and Reuters recently reported, Cramer gave an interview on TheStreet.com's Wall Street Confidential in late December (watch it here) that can be read as recommending that hedge funds boost returns by orchestrating stock prices and spreading false information. He said that "this is the way the market really works" and that those who don't do these things "shouldn't be in the game." He also talked about his own practices—orchestrating stock prices—to boost returns at the hedge fund he ran in the 1990s.
Even those familiar with Cramer's "just be outrageous" style will find this clip startling. It raises questions not only about Cramer's activities as a hedge-fund manager, but about his judgment. It also, I think, threatens Cramer's career.
Let's begin by reviewing the definition of illegal market manipulation and what, exactly, Cramer said.
According to the SEC's Web site, market "manipulation" is:
intentional conduct designed to deceive investors by controlling or artificially affecting the market for a security. Manipulation can involve a number of techniques ... [such as] spreading false or misleading information about a company … or rigging quotes, prices or trades to create a false or deceptive picture of the demand for a security. Those found guilty of manipulation are subject to criminal and civil penalties.
On the show, Cramer begins by ignoring a seemingly unrelated question and describing how he used to move the market futures. (Click here for a verbatim transcript of Cramer's comments. The excerpts below include interpolations, indicated by brackets, that try to make sense of Cramer's shorthand.)
A lot of times when I was short at my hedge fund—meaning I needed [the market to go] down—I would create a level of activity before [the market opened] that could drive the [pre-market] futures [down]. … Similarly, if I were long, and I wanted to make things a little bit rosy, I would go in and [buy] a bunch of stocks and make sure that they were higher …
It's a fun game, and it's a lucrative game. You can move [the market] up and then fade it—that often creates a very negative feel. … That's a strategy very worth doing. … I would encourage anyone in the hedge fund game to do it. Because it's legal. And it is a very quick way to make money. And very satisfying.
Cramer says that this sort of maneuver is legal, which is a debatable proposition. And Cramer's next comment appears to suggest that he at least thinks the behavior is something to hide:
By the way, no one else in the world would ever admit that. But I don't care. And I'm not going to say it on TV.
(What Cramer meant by that last remark, presumably, was that he wasn't going to say it on CNBC, which airs his hit show, Mad Money. That he said this while sitting in front of a TV camera is bizarre.) Cramer then goes on to describe what struggling hedge funds should do to improve their performance:
[Y]ou've really got to control the market. You can't let it lift. When you get a [bellwether stock that is soaring like] Research in Motion, it's really important to use a lot of your firepower to knock that down. … So, let's say I were short. What I would do is hit a lot of guys with RIMM [sell a lot of Research in Motion stock to a lot of investors].
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: New York Threatened By O'er-Crowding As Population Climbs To Twelve Thousands
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: Citizens Are Now Free to Practise Any Form Of Protestantism They Want
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:16:40 -0400 - Historical Archives: Local Black-Smith is Disappointed By Son's Wishes To Be-Come a Wheel-Wright
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:33:20 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Marcus | Forget Biden. I'd like to see McCain face off against Palin.
Toles: Another McCain SurpriseStumped: Where's Palin's Baby?
- Cohen: How an Economic Crisis Is Like a War
- Froomkin: How's Bush? Put a Fork in Him.
- Milbank: A House Divided Along Twisted Lines
- Robinson: Ugly Politics at Justice | Q&A
- Today's Headlines
- Moral Questions for the Presidential Candidates
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:44:27 GMT - How to Protect Yourself Financially--At Any Age
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:46:57 GMT - Cover Story: Sarah Palin's 'Folk' Problem
Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:37:19 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Down for the Count
Mon, 6 October 2008 3:05:47 GMT - Wall Street in Black and White
Fri, 3 October 2008 20:36:07 GMT - Death of Black Radio
Mon, 6 October 2008 2:28:00 GMT - » More from The Root

bad advice













