
Libby Jury Doubts Its Doubt
On March 2, the 11 remaining jurors in the perjury trial of White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby had a question. They sent Judge Reggie Walton a note (see below) asking him to clarify the meaning of "reasonable doubt." At least one juror wondered whether the prosecution must present evidence proving "it is not humanly possible for someone not to recall an event" before the jurors could find Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Judge Walton sent back a note asking the jurors to clarify what they meant by "humanly possible."
The jurors may not know it, but a definition of "reasonable doubt" can be found on Pages 26-28 of the 127-page booklet of jury instructions that they received when deliberations began. (To read the three-page definition, click to Pages 2, 3, and 4.) The jury instructions are a little circular, though, as elucidations of this less-than-straightforward concept tend to be. They begin: "Reasonable doubt, as the name implies, is a doubt based on reason ... "
Thanks to www.TalkLeft.com for posting the jury's note, and to blogger Tom Maguire for posting the jury instructions.
Got a Hot Document? Send it to . Please indicate whether you wish to remain anonymous.
![]() |













Is Hasan a Terrorist? And Other Great Stories From Slate This Week.
How Sarah Palin Is Dividing the Republican Party
Can We Apply the Lessons of Y2K to Swine Flu?
They Made a Movie About the Wrong Aviatrix
Jamie Foxx's New Single Is Extremely Lewd
The Week's Best Editorial Cartoons