Slate's Bizbox
politics: Who's winning, who's losing, and why.

Dispatches From the Scooter Libby Trial

politics
entries
12345
from: John Dickerson

The Mystery Note

Updated Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007, at 5:02 PM ET
Scooter Libby arrives at court. Click image to expand.

There was a moment of near drama in the Scooter Libby trial Wednesday. At 9:45 a.m. the lawyers, court sketch artists, and journalists (including Chris Matthews, who has a side role in this drama) packed the courtroom waiting to hear about a note from the jury six days into deliberations. But after we took our seats, Judge Walton said he wasn't going to read the note because he wasn't sure he understood what the jury was asking. "I am going to send a note back to the jury saying, can you please clarify your answer," he said. Everyone slouched back and waited for the rewrite.

After a half-hour, Judge Walton returned with a new note. Now we'd get to see what they wanted to know. "After further discussion we now are clear on what we need to do," the note said. "No further clarification. We apologize."

Never mind.

Once the first note was released to the press, it was easy to see why the judge was confused. The jurors were asking about the third count of the five-count indictment, the one concerning false statements Libby made to the FBI about his conversation with Matt Cooper. Libby said he only told Cooper he'd heard from other reporters that Joe Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, worked at the CIA and that he didn't know if this was true. Cooper contradicted this, testifying that Libby confirmed Plame's status without qualification. The jury asked, "Is the charge that the statement was made or about the content of the statement itself?"

What exactly were they asking? Were they talking about Libby's statement to the FBI or his statement to Cooper? This was the first news to come out of the court since a juror was dismissed Monday, so in the press room there was a brief frenzy. We were like squirrels fighting over a nut. Was this a ceramic garden-ornament nut and therefore of no nutritional value? Yes, but darn if it didn't look like a real one. The jury seemed to want to know whether Libby was accused of lying to the FBI or lying to Cooper. The former is a lie for which he has been indicted; the latter, lying to a reporter, is, sadly, not a criminal offense. The jury apparently worked this out on its own between notes.

politics
entries
12345
from: John Dickerson

The Mystery Note

Updated Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007, at 5:02 PM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
John Dickerson is Slate's chief political correspondent and author of On Her Trail. He can be reached at . Seth Stevenson is a frequent contributor to Slate.
Photographs of: Robert Novak by Alex Wong/Getty Images; Scooter Libby arriving at the courthouse and John Hannah by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images; Scooter Libby on Slate's home page by Mark Wilson/Getty Images.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Let the Oil Deals Flow
Raad Alkadiri | Congress should not interfere in the oil industry's contract negotiations with the Iraqi government.