Diagramming SentencesThe Supreme Court's war on sentencing guidelines.

(Continued from page 1)

PRINTDISCUSSE-MAILRSSRECOMMEND...SINGLE PAGE

FacebookMySpace Mixx Digg Reddit del.icio.us Furl Ma.gnolia SphereStumbleUponCLOSE

Cunningham is only the court's first word on the subject this term. In two cases to be argued next month, the court will fill in more detail about how much discretion federal judges actually now have. Doug Berman, law professor and sentencing blogger extraordinaire, thinks that both cases look like vehicles for additional change and leniency. In one, the defendant is a military veteran whose perjury crime looks more like a misunderstanding than a deliberate lie. In the second, an appeals court supplied the facts it relied on to reverse the sentencing break given by a trial judge. Get ready for more destruction.

PRINTE-MAILRECOMMEND...RSS

FacebookMySpace Mixx Digg Reddit del.icio.us Furl Ma.gnolia SphereStumbleUponCLOSE

Emily Bazelon is a Slate senior editor and an editor of DoubleX.

Illustration by Mark Alan Stamaty.

SPONSORED CONTENT

• The YouTube Bully and the Sex-Messaging Cop
  Courts stick up for the constitutional rights of online troublemakers.
  Emily Bazelon | Dec. 16, 2009
• Torture Roulette
  The Obama administration has picked the worst possible case for its first torture trial.
  Dahlia Lithwick | Dec. 14, 2009
• Articles of Faith
  Why Americans can't talk about religion and the Supreme Court.
  Dahlia Lithwick | Dec. 10, 2009
• Search for more Jurisprudence articles
• Subscribe to the Jurisprudence RSS feed
• View our complete Jurisprudence archive