|
(738 words; posted Wednesday, Nov. 27; to be composted Friday, Dec. 9)
Write for SLATE
We make the following announcement with some trepidation: We are looking for a few writers to help produce some of SLATE's features. In particular, we'd like to find regular writers, on a part-time basis, for "The Gist," "Summary Judgment," and "Assessment." The reason for posting this opportunity to SLATE readers is that our own readers--we hope--are familiar with what we're up to. So, if you need an explanation of these features, you're not the person we're looking for. But all of them (along with "The Week/The Spin," "In Other Magazines," "Varnish Remover," etc.) are what we call "meta" features--efforts to summarize events and/or describe how the culture is digesting them. We hope they add up to an adequate, if not comprehensive, "take" on what's going on in the world and what's being said about it. Enough to get you through a dinner party, perhaps, or a Senate race in a smaller state. The qualities needed, apart from writing skill, are an omnivorous appetite for politics, policy, and/or the arts, and a talent for intelligent condensation. We have a feeling some frustrated lawyers may be what we're looking for. But--whoever. If you're interested, send a brief summary of who you are and which feature interests you to slate@msn.com. Put "Write for SLATE?" in the subject line. And don't pester us. (Following these instructions exactly is the first test.) Our fear is that we will burden ourselves with a mountain of applications, and raise and dash a lot of hopes. But let's give it a try. Years ago, the New Republic discovered Charles Krauthammer--then a practicing psychiatrist, now a distinguished and fearsome conservative columnist--this way. Whether that demonstrates the success or peril of the method depends, we guess, on your point of view.

|
|