HOME / dear prudence: Advice on manners and morals.

Kith of DeathI love her, but she doesn't know I killed her father.

Get "Dear Prudence" delivered to your inbox each week; click here to sign up. Please send your questions for publication to . (Questions may be edited.)

Dear Prudence,
I have fallen in love with a woman I knew from childhood and ran into again after not seeing her for 20 years. As kids we hardly noticed each other, but when we met again after all these years we felt an immediate attraction. The problem is that when I was 12 years old I did something terrible that caused an accident that killed her father. No one ever found out it was me and I've never told anyone after all these years. I feel horrible about what happened, but it was a long time ago and I've gotten on with my life. But now what? Should I tell this woman that I caused her father's death many years ago? I'm afraid it would ruin our relationship and we love each other a great deal. The accident occurred when I was in a cornfield at night—we were throwing corn at cars when they drove by. We couldn't see the cars because we were hidden in the field. An ear of corn I threw went through the open car window and struck her father in the head, causing him to lose control of the car and crash into a tree. I ran from the scene and was never implicated.

—Guilty and Confused

Dear Guilty,
History and literature are full of great loves doomed because of circumstance and fate. I'm afraid that being responsible for the death of your girlfriend's father—and having kept this terrible fact a secret—adds you to the list. You are contemplating keeping quiet in order to keep the girl. That is cruel and untenable. Do you hold her hand and nod sympathetically every time she says, "After my father died …"? You cannot build a healthy relationship on such deceit. You mentioned there was at least one other person with you in the field. Imagine how your girlfriend would feel if whoever was with you that night finds out about your romance and sends her a letter about what you did. There's no undoing the heartbreak caused by your childhood prank, but you have the power to at least answer the question for this woman (and her family) about what happened to her father that night. Telling her is the right and moral thing, and you have to accept that doing so in all likelihood will cause her to end your relationship. Before you tell, you also need to be prepared for the legal consequences of confessing. I talked to several law professors and they all said you should consult an attorney to find out your possible criminal and civil liability (and just to add to your dilemma, each said if you came to them as a client, they would advise you to keep your mouth shut). If you do decide that you can keep the secret and still live with yourself, then you must break off the romance. Her father died because of what you did accidentally; don't destroy your own decency because of what you're doing deliberately.

—Prudie

Dear Prudence,
My husband and I were recently invited to a good friend's wedding out of town. We won't be able to attend but we would like to send a gift. It turns out the bride and groom have specified that donations be made to their favorite charity in lieu of gifts. I love this idea; however, the charity they chose recently published views on the U.S. involvement in the Middle East that my husband and I were rather insulted by. On the other hand, the core mission of the organization itself is admirable. My husband does not want to donate to this organization because of their remarks and wants to choose another. I say that it would be an insult to the bride and groom because it's (not so?) subtly judging their views on philanthropy and politics at a time that's totally inappropriate to do so. I'd rather just suck it up and go with the favored organization to make our friend happy. Who do you think is right?

—Donation Dilemma

Dear Donation,
If only they'd just registered for a gravy boat—at least it doesn't come with its own Middle East policy. No one should feel obligated to contribute to a charity that makes them uncomfortable—and no one is obligated to provide a wedding gift, either. I agree with you that selecting another charity signals a criticism of their choice (but it is the couple who has injected politics into their nuptials). So, forget about making a donation. Instead, since you were unable to attend the wedding, why not tell them you want to celebrate with them by taking them out to dinner when they get back from their honeymoon—and make sure you discuss subjects other than wedding gifts and the Middle East.

—Prudie

Dear Prudie,
I am an 18-year-old woman who has been shaving her head for about two years now, purely out of choice. It is comfortable, simple, and flattering on me. Of course, I receive many outlandish comments that put me in awkward situations due to my appearance and I accept it as inevitable. My particular question is how to respond to post-cancer patients who try to speak to me in a motivational or inspirational way. I appreciate that they try support others, but I am bald, not sickly, and they can't assume that because a woman is without hair that it's because of chemotherapy. This has happened to me a few times, and each time the patient wants to tell me their story, show how their hair is growing back, or bare their pink-ribbon tattoo, often after I've told them that I'm cancer-free. I don't want to appear insensitive, but why should I be bothered with hearing a stranger's story when I can't even empathize?

—Hairless by Choice

Dear Hairless,
People should not approach strangers with remarks about their appearance (and a bald woman could have a condition such as alopecia areata). But as you are lucky enough to have hair, maybe you should reconsider how comfortable your look really is since it results in endless comments and sympathy from people undergoing chemotherapy. If you want to keep shaving, then the kindest thing to do is to spare a moment for people who are concerned that someone so young is going through what they are. Listen politely, wish them well, and reassure them that you're fine.

—Prudie

Dear Prudence,
I am a young man of 28 and I have a close lady friend, let's call her Jane, who is 23. We have been friends for a few years now and we talk about a wide range of topics. Jane is beautiful, funny, and very wise for such a young woman. I was attracted to her from the first time we met, but she made it clear from the start that the only relationship she wanted from me was that of a good and close friend, so that's what I've been (that seems to be the only relationship that women want from me, but that is a whole different topic). A few days ago, Jane called me and said, "I've been getting a weird vibe from you." She then said she wanted to cut back on the frequency and duration of when we hang out. I have talked to friends about this and we have all come to the same conclusion: Jane's feelings for me have changed and she is confused about how to move forward. All my friends say to just ride it out and give her the space, that it's all part of the game. What do I do? This issue has me very frustrated and feeling lost.

—Tired of Games

Dear Tired,
Your friends are half right (and half-baked). Jane's feelings have changed, except she's not contemplating how to become your girlfriend, but how to stop being your friend. You are wild for this woman and have been hanging around hoping she will finally reciprocate your feelings—that is the vibe she's picking up. Since she knows she never will, she's finally telling you to go away. That hurts, but stop driving yourself crazy by investing so much in a woman who's not interested. Perhaps part of your problem with women in general is that you fall for ones who don't want you, then campaign to get them to change their minds. Skip them, and concentrate on the women who don't tell you right from the start that all they'll ever want to be is friends.

—Prudie

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Photograph of Prudie by David Plotz.
COMMENTS

Remarks from the Fray:

As a cancer patient, I have been "cancer free" for 1 year now, which means that the cancer was removed entirely and there have been no signs of recurrence. Yay! I say this to explain that if a bald woman told me she was "cancer free" I would take it to meant that her chemo had gone really really well and would continue to chat about treatment.
So I hate Prudie's advice to have 'Hairless by Choice' regrow her hair. When Healthy women voluntarily shave their heads, their beauty can help remove some of the stigma associated with cancer treatment. It's hard enough to go through chemo without feeling like you look atrocious. If there were more beautiful bald women out there, chemo patients could at least feel like maybe they're a little beautiful too. And every little ounce of confidence counts when you're going through chemo.

So, Hairless by choice, stay bald and own it. But when people approach you and share their cancer stories, say "I've never had cancer" instead of "I'm cancer free". Then throw in some comment about knowing you're no Alek Wek, but that you choose to shave your head because you think its a beautiful look. You'll leave the conversation making the world a little more accepting, making cancer patients a little more confident, and avoiding an awkward chat about cancer treatment.

--fi_b

(To reply, click here.)

I fail to see the difference in principle between this letter and last week's letter from a reader so offended by the mere appearance of an American flag hat that they wanted to fire the contractor.

In either case freedom of speech is getting supressed by de facto censorship. Even worse is that the two situations put side by side create a Catch-22. You can't do business if you criticize America, but you can't do business if you support America either.

--lowdog

(To reply, click here.)

We reserve marriage for adults and then act like a bride and groom are special creatures who can't be treated like adults.

Prudie's suggestion is essentially to lie to the bride and groom. Ignore their request, then do what you like, and pretend there's nothing to discuss.

An adult response to the situation would be:

Donate to the charity of your choice and explain to the bride and groom why you didn't donate to the one they suggested.

--Richmond

(To reply, click here.)

[Dear Guilty and Confused:]

Stop worrying. The issue is probably moot now since you've just about hanged yourself. "Oh, but, my letter was signed anonymously!"

Let's see—between 20 and 25 years ago, a man is killed while driving alone down a country road, with a pre-teen daughter at home, by a someone employing a weaponized corn cob-- who got away with it. Oh sure, that happens all the time—no way to identify the incident, is there? Well, in a nation obsessed with "true crime" stories, "cold cases" and "America's Most Wanted", you just gave enough details for this woman, any of her family, any local busybody or retired law man to figure out whom you are talking about and who you must be. Brilliant. Really. MTC is curious to see whether you end up in an MSNBC documentary or "America's Dumbest Criminals" first.

--doodahman

(To reply, click here.)

(9/9)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
The Bhopal disaster.88/091203_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on the White House gatecrashers.66/091203_TC.jpg
Loud and clear.26/091203_TD.jpg