hot document: Primary sources exposed and explained.

How Sorry Is Andrew Young?

hot document
entries
1
from: Timothy Noah

Posted Thursday, Aug. 24, 2006, at 2:07 AM ET

Andrew Young's outrageous slur against Jews, Arabs, and Koreans lost him his job as Wal-Mart's goodwill emissary, but in the days since the remarks by the former U.N. ambassador, Atlanta mayor, and aide to Martin Luther King Jr., surfaced in the Los Angeles Sentinel, a black-owned weekly serving that city's African-American population, various commentators have rushed to defend, explain, or otherwise minimize what Young said. Among these apologists is Young himself, who since issuing an official mea culpa (reprinted, highlighted, and annotated below) has been signalling that this is all a meangingless game of racial politics at which he, a longtime civil rights leader, is, notwithstanding his momentary bêtise, a consummate player.

This cynical view is lent some credence by the depressingly predictable failure of the various groups representing Jews, Arabs, and Koreans to band together for a joint protest condemning Young's offense against all three. (An attack against one ethnic group is not, sadly, seen as an attack against all.) Instead, the Korean American Association of Greater Atlanta requested and was granted a meeting with Young, at which Young apologized for offending Korean-Americans. The Atlanta chapter of the American Jewish Committee hopes to meet with Young as early as next week, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, so Young can apologize to it for offending Jews. And Haitham M. Haddad, identified by the Journal-Constitution as "a member of the Arab-American community," is working on setting up a meeting at which Young can apologize for offending Arabs. No word on whether the Rev. Joseph E. Lowery, who succeeded King and Ralph Abernathy as president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, will get a meeting too. Lowery publicly took offense at what his former colleague Young said. But as an African-American, Lowery was speaking not against bigotry toward the black community, but rather against bigotry toward three groups to which he does not belong. His charmingly old-fashioned protest, grounded not in injury but in principle, can safely be ignored.

Here is the passage from Young's interview with Yussuf Simmonds, managing editor of the Los Angeles Sentinel, that caused offense:

When asked about Wal-Mart moving into areas and displacing the "mom-and-pop" stores, Young had this response. "Well, I think they should; they ran the 'mom-and-pop' stores out of my neighborhood. But you see those are the people who have been overcharging us—selling us stale bread and bad meat and wilted vegetables. And they sold out and retired to Florida. I think they've ripped off our communities enough. First it was Jews, then it was Koreans and now it's Arabs. Very few Black folks own these stores."

Various African-American writers, including the estimable Clarence Page and Erin Aubrey Kaplan, have suggested that what Young was trying to say, in his admittedly ham-handed way, was that blacks historically have not owned the mom-and-pop stores in black neighborhoods, and that this is a source of legitimate frustration in the black community. A perfectly valid point, but not, you'll notice, the one that Young made in the interview. Young didn't say that more blacks ought to own mom-and-pop grocery stores in black neighborhoods; he said that the people who have owned and operated these stores have "been overcharging" blacks for "stale bread and bad meat and wilted vegetables" and then "sold out and retired to Florida." They have "ripped off our communities." They have done this, Young implied strongly, because they are not themselves black.

Not one iota of evidence suggests that the economic and racial exploitation Young attributes to Jews, Arabs, and Koreans has any basis in fact. Where are these Koreans who are getting rich off the stores they open up at 8 a.m. and close at 11 p.m.? Nobody's spotting them in Palm Beach, cackling over the fortunes they amassed with appalling speed. Like the Jews and Arabs who preceeded them, they are attempting to gain a tenuous footing in the middle class. They are hoping to send their children to college. If this is exploitation, one need question the competence of the exploiters, because they have paltry gains, ill-gotten or otherwise, to show for their treachery. One can well understand how inner-city customers, who usually have even less, would come to resent the outsiders' profit margins, no matter how negligible. But Young didn't describe this resentment. He expressed it, and he made untrue accusations against specific ethnic groups to encourage it, all in the service of giving the corporation he worked for an easier time locating its megastores in low-income black neighborhoods.

In the Sentinel interview, Young said that Wal-Mart "should" displace mom-and-pop stores. No doubt he's correct that Wal-Mart can provide some of the same goods to inner-city consumers at lower prices. But that's only because Wal-Mart doesn't aspire to provide its employees a minimally decent standard of living. (Economies of scale, of course, also lend an advantage.) Whether the result is a net benefit to low-income blacks I leave to others to decide. But Wal-Mart's stinginess is no reason to judge harshly inner-city shop owners of any race who seek some sliver of economic security.

Got a Hot Document? Send it to, or alert me at, . Please indicate whether you wish to remain anonymous.

Young says "inappropriate" but he doesn't say "untrue." Asked in an Aug. 22 interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper whether he thought his remarks were "bigoted, racist, and anti-Semitic," Young said, "I don't, but I do think that those statements, as reported, were bigoted and anti-everything and everybody." This construct put the principal blame on the media (including, presumably, the Los Angeles Sentinel) for taking his words out of context. Later in the interview, Young was more contrite, saying "I shouldn't have lost my cool" and referring to his words as "this kind of almost hate speech." That piqued Cooper's interest ("do you really view it as hate speech?"), which in turn sent Young scurrying back to blaming the press. "That's the way it was interpreted by the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times," he said, "that I was a demagogue on the rise and that they'd better shut me up quick. I pleaded with them. You know, I told them I welcomed the Hispanic community into Atlanta as mayor. [Er, who said anything about Young being prejudiced against Latinos?] I've been to Korea five times, trying to work with the Koreans. My relationship with Jews and Arabs has gone all the way back to early childhood, frankly. And for me to be labelled as somebody trying to stir up racial discord offended me, but I had to say I contributed to it. And that's what I was sorry for."
Forgiveness for...what? The Wal-Mart statement indicates, appropriately, that the offense he caused is legitimate. A subsequent Aug. 22 op-ed that Young wrote for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution was fuzzier on this point. There he termed his remarks merely "misguided" and concluded, "I must never forget, nor should any of us, that sensitivity to the needs and concerns of others is paramount. Society is much more fragile than we imagine." People are so touchy these days! You never know WHO you're going to piss off!
Wal-Mart obviously recoils at the bigotry of Young's caricature of Jews, Arabs, and Koreans. Even if you drained Young's comments of their ethnic references, however, his "good riddance to small business" argument is not one with which Wal-Mart wants publicly to be associated. Or so one would think. But Young has been making this argument on Wal-Mart's behalf for months, his superiors either unaware or unconcerned. In a March 2 NPR interview defending his work for Wal-Mart, Young said, "The small businesses that everybody wants to protect are the same small businesses that have been overcharging black people and poor people all over the country. Who's saying 'Let's protect these smallshop owners and our communities'? They're not black people that run these shops." If the interviewer, Ed Gordon, had had a little more on the ball, he would have asked, "Er, Mr. Ambassador, who DOES run those shops that overcharge black people and poor people?"
These are mostly folks who already were conservative business or pro-business types, as opposed to the grass-roots community activists for "working families" that Wal-Mart would have you believe. At the national level they include the singer Pat Boone, Jennifer Carroll, a Republican state legislator in Florida, and Ron Galloway, who produced a documentary called "Why Wal-Mart Works And Why That Drives Some People C-R-A-Z-Y."
hot document
entries
1
from: Timothy Noah

Posted Thursday, Aug. 24, 2006, at 2:07 AM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Timothy Noah is a senior writer at Slate.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
PLUS » Ruth Marcus: Berlin vs. Baghdad Q&A