Slate's Bizbox
mixing desk: Songs you've got to hear.

Mozart Mozart Mozart!Three pianists tackle the same sonata.

By Marc Geelhoed
Posted Monday, July 10, 2006, at 12:54 AM ET
Vienna Recital by Yundi Li

Faced with the seemingly simple task of purchasing a Mozart recording, an interested buyer can reasonably ask, "What's the difference between all these musicians?" After all, Mozart can be pretty straightforward: His tempos don't leave a great deal of room for interpretation (quick is quick), the phrases are clearly marked, and it's easy to tell the melody from the accompaniment. The listener may assume that all those pianists sound alike when playing Mozart's piano sonatas.

Of course this isn't true, though. All those Mozart recordings exist because Mozart has won a place in the Classical Music Hall of Fame (also known as "the canon") and because pianists have found methods of playing his music in their own ways. Pianist A might speed up where Pianist B slows down; Pianist C might clip a note that Pianist D thinks ought to ring out into the hall (or into a recording-studio microphone). Another perk of landing in that pantheon is that a record label will occasionally issue many recordings of your work at about the same time. The esteemed label Deutsche Grammophon, home to Herbert von Karajan and his recordings with the Berlin Philharmonic and Leonard Bernstein's final albums, recently did just that. It put out three recordings of Mozart's Piano Sonata in C major, K. 330, in close succession.

Memory by Lang Lang

Lang Lang, the 23-year-old sensation, released the sonata on his Memory disc, a release that ostensibly highlighted the way he's rethought these works. The fact that he's 23 and barely had time to develop a mature interpretation isn't really the point; instead, he's aiming to prove that he's not just a flash-in-the-pan prodigy who bangs out Rachmaninoff, but one who can play that serious music, too. Mikhail Pletnev and Yundi Li followed soon after. The impetuous Russian Pletnev included the sonata in his collection of his "favorite" Mozart sonatas, while Li, like Lang Lang, a young Chinese signee to DG, included the sonata on his recital disc recorded in Vienna's famed Musikverein, home to the Vienna Philharmonic.

So, what do they do differently? Lang Lang largely takes a more spacious view of the sonata and plays with slower tempos than Pletnev and Li in each of the three movements. Pletnev lets his fancy dictate his phrasing and largely avoids playing in a fixed tempo for any stretch of time. Li is the speed-demon and clicks through the sonata's faster movements as if he's spinning the tracking wheel on his BlackBerry.

Mozart Piano Sonatas by Mikhail PletnevTake the way they each begin the piece, for starters. Lang Lang Play Mediaplays this sprightly music innocuously and sounds like he doesn't want to offend. The scales and arpeggios are proper and polite. Pletnev's much more Play Mediastrident, and puts small accents on almost every beat. Li is off to the Play Mediaraces. He's got the technique to play it that fast, so that's what he does. Compared to Lang Lang's Apollonian detachment, Li is playing the smarty-pants.

The mostly sunny sonata turns bleaker in the middle of the second movement. Mozart heads into dark F minor territory, anchoring the moment with insistently repeated F's in the left hand that ring out like the low tolling of a bell. Pletnev uses those notes to push the music Play Mediaforward. But the notes are almost inaudible on Li's Play Mediarecording and Lang Play Mediaconnects them to each other to create an almost noirish atmosphere.

The final movement, a happy, major-key allegretto, ends with a little joke. Mozart gives a bit of a tease near the end, as if he'll repeat some earlier material, but instead signs off with three sharp chords. Who has a sense of humor with this? Lang Lang Play Mediadoesn't; Li and Pletnev pull out a little bit of firepower, though, particularly Play MediaPletnev. Li lets that enigmatic chord dissolve before pulling a Play Mediasurprise punch with those three final chords.

This little parlor game of comparing recordings is a bit of fun among classical-music aficionados who will argue the merits of Alfred Brendel's Beethoven versus Richard Goode's for hours. But finding out how to notice what's different and how to say so is much more pleasurable, ultimately, than punching someone out in the name of Bach. Which recording of the three mentioned above is the best? Which one did you prefer? That's the one.

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Marc Geelhoed is the classical music writer for Time Out Chicago and blogs at Deceptively Simple.
Audio excerpts from Yundi Li–Vienna Recital © 2005 Deutsche Grammophon; Lang Lang–Memory © 2005 Deutsche Grammophon, and Mikhail Pletnev–Mozart Piano Sonatas © 2005 Deutsche Grammophon. All rights reserved.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Remarks from the Fray:

I'm sure I'm wrong about this, but as far as the phrases being "clearly marked", I'm not convinced Mozart would've bothered to include phrasing in his manuscripts, that phrasings in his sonatas are interpretations added over the course of the last 200 hundred years when the piano pieces' began to be published widely, some interpretations, on the page, that look so busy as to have almost too much to say. [...]

The thing about Mozart that makes him so devilish to play is that, unlike, say, Beethoven and Brahms, and even, to a lesser extent, Bach, Mozart's piano music is so… transparent, and as such, exposes every single weakness in a pianist's playing, not the least of which is technique.

--switters

(To reply, click here.)

Pletnev apparently has decided to play the whole sonata staccato. Sometimes you hear pianists play Bach that way, to emulate the plinky-plunky sound of a harpsichord, but it seems a little bizarre to subject Mozart to that treatment.

Lang's first-movement excerpt was too bland for my taste, especially the left hand, while his second movement was too melodramatic. This isn't a funeral march.

So that leaves Li, who I think strikes a good balance in all three movements. I don't find his first movement tempo a bit too fast; Glenn Gould does it about twice as fast.

But none of these recordings would come with me to the desert island. I'm sure there's a definitive recording out there somewhere -- anybody got any suggestions?

--slobone

(To reply, click here.)

From these excerpts, all three musicians sound uncomfortable. I don't think they particularly like the music. In each case, they're trying for an effect in a rather deliberate way. "Hmmm, I think I'll play these notes really really short so my version will sound like a new approach, distinct from others." This is all about ego.

The performer needs to let Mozart emerge from the performance, and none of these three seems sufficiently self-effacing to do that. Their interpretations are too self-serving, and they tell us nothing about Mozart except that it's possible to play Mozart really, really badly.

--Gemini_

(To reply, click here.)

Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Imagine if...
Hiatt | What if McCain had waged his campaign based on respect?
Editorial: Meddlesome PalinKing: The Danger of Palin Power