HOME / dispatches: Notes from different corners of the world.

Bulls Without HornsAfrican Union troops in Darfur—too few with too little.

Women gather firewood while A.U. troops watch over them. Click image to expand.ZALENGEI, Sudan—The firewood patrol bumped along in the oppressive heat of a western Darfur morning: about 100 women, walking quickly and in silence, accompanied by four vehicles manned by peacekeepers from Rwanda and Nigeria. The women were leaving the Khamsa Dagaig camp for internally displaced people on a twice-weekly hunt for sticks and twigs, protected by soldiers from the African Union from the armed marauders and Janjaweed militias who roam the perimeter of Darfur camps.

I had received clearance from African Union headquarters to be posted with the peacekeeping troops in Darfur. (As a former country director for Sudan for Save the Children and as a board member of Mercy Corps, I had a long history in Sudan and Africa.) A few miles outside the camp, we began to pass the first of many groups of nomads, all armed, herding camels and cattle. A group rode by, too close. "Janjaweed," said one of the A.U. officers. His soldiers fanned out, alert and watchful. The nomads eyed the soldiers and moved on. The women kept walking without looking up.

Thanks to the African Union, the tense moment passed without incident. But without such protection, limited to fewer than half the Darfur camps, the women are vulnerable to attack.

On this day, the women walked 10 miles west to a stand of dried bushes and dead trees. In the 110-degree heat, they chopped up neat piles of sticks, tied them together, and loaded the bundles onto their heads. A lucky few had donkeys. The round trip took seven hours.

The countryside around Khamsa Dagaig—and much of Darfur—is a desolate expanse of hard-packed clay and sand, dotted with thorny scrub brush and gnarled trees. We passed two burned-out villages, destroyed by the Janjaweed militias armed and funded by the Sudanese government. The round bases of several mud huts were still standing; everything else was blackened ash. Brush and debris covered the mouth of a well; the attackers had stuffed it with corpses to poison the water source.

The A.U. patrol—two open jeeps each carrying 12 armed soldiers and two Land Cruisers carrying officers and civilian police—hadn't taken a civilian visitor along before. Col. Kamili Karegye, the Rwandan A.U. sector commander, told me there had never been an attack in his sector during a firewood patrol. But although his troops conduct patrols for five camps, seven local camps are left unprotected for lack of A.U. personnel. At Kalma camp, which houses 120,000 IDPs, at least 1,000 women go out on each firewood patrol, walking farther and farther as the desolate landscape is picked bare.

The African Union plays an important protective role for these camps. But as we were on this patrol, serious fighting broke out only 20 miles away at Jebel Marra, forcing the evacuation of international relief agencies and leaving 100,000 IDPs without aid. In that case, the African Union was nowhere to be seen.

As Col. Kamili explained, the A.U. troops don't have the means to intervene in conflict. He had headed for Jebel Marra the previous week but had been turned back at a rebel roadblock. The A.U. mandate didn't permit his convoy to force its way through. And the lightly armed A.U. troops are no match for the rebels or government troops and militias.

Increasingly, A.U. officers feel that they are becoming targets who cannot protect themselves, let alone protect innocent civilians. Speaking of the African Union's limited equipment and mandate, one officer said, "We are bulls without horns."

Col. Kamili's patrol is organized; well-equipped; and coordinates activities with internally displaced people, relief agencies, and Sudanese police, but not all operations are as effective. Another A.U. base in Darfur, next to a camp for 14,000 IDPs, was starkly underequipped and rendered nearly ineffectual as a result.

Many of the displaced try to leave this camp by day to farm their lands or find firewood. Three days before I arrived, two girls looking for firewood had been attacked by men on camelback. Both were raped and beaten. They ran back, barefoot, to the camp in such terror that one girl arrived with the skin completely torn off her feet.

As locals have congregated in densely populated camps, armed nomadic groups have descended from northern Darfur. They now control the countryside and are increasingly emboldened, rendering the displaced virtual prisoners. The A.U. force is increasingly powerless in the face of the violence, most of it targeted at ethnic populations and much of it sponsored by the Sudanese government.

The A.U. base in southern Darfur, a large encampment set in the desert and surrounded by rolls of barbed wire, features neat rows of white tents for the soldiers and air-conditioned offices. But this base of 136 troops has only one computer, one printer, and one Thuraya satellite phone, with a "prepaid credit" of 50 minutes per month. The phones are useless after a week or so.

The base has five vehicles, but only three are operational, so commanders can send out just one patrol of 24 troops each day. The vehicles are equipped with short-wave radio systems, but there is no base station for either system. If the commanding officer wants to communicate with a patrol, he goes out to the parking lot to use the radio in one of the broken vehicles.

There is one interpreter, an Arab man from Khartoum. He does not speak the local language, and the local population views him with suspicion. It is no wonder that the commanding officer says he has received no complaints from camp residents.

Despite the problems, much was impressive and encouraging. Most officers spoke with pride of the African Union taking on its first major peacekeeping mission. They were moved by the suffering they saw all around them, and there was little cynicism about their work. But many were daunted by the scale and ferocity of the conflict and their limited ability to stop the violence. The peacekeepers' impact varies widely, depending on the caliber of the local commanding officer. The African Union force is grossly underresourced for this crisis, with insufficient manpower, weapons, communications, and logistical support. There are fewer than 5,000 military protection troops, along with 2,100 unarmed civilian police and military advisers, in a war that spans a land the size of Texas.

Every A.U. officer I spoke with in Darfur expressed support for a "re-hatting" of the mission, switching from the green helmets of the African Union to the blue helmets of the United Nations. The A.U. troops would remain the core of the peacekeeping effort, under the direction of—and with support, training, and additional resources from—the United Nations.

The A.U. force has deployed aggressively, placing small units at remote locations and standing firm under attack, even while taking casualties. It's important that a combined U.N. force retain these elements and encourage A.U. units to remain in place, rather than withdrawing to larger bases in towns and leaving remote populations more vulnerable.

Col. Raji, the A.U. commanding officer in Nyala, the capital of southern Darfur, addressed the re-hatting issue with a Nigerian fable: "A villager walking down the road saw a dangerous snake but could not kill it. Another man from a nearby village walking by was able to seize the snake and kill it. It doesn't matter who kills the snake. What matters is that it is dead."

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Linda Mason is the chairman and founder of Bright Horizons Family Solutions and a board member of Human Rights Watch. You can e-mail her at .
COMMENTS

Remarks from the Fray:

It is clear even to the casual observer that [the AU forces] are inadequate to protect the perimeter of Darfur camps from armed marauders and Janjaweed militias who are backed by the Government in Khartoum.

The genocide committed by these warlord assisted by Khartoum must not go unpunished by a civilised international community. [...]

The U. N. should therefore make it clear to Khartoum that the international community of civilized nations would not stand by and allow Khartoum to rape, maim, kill and destroy freedom loving people of Darfur. The long arm of justice will get them and punish them for every single atrocity committed in Darfur. If the U. N. needs to take military action against Khartoum, the sooner the better to save lives, property, culture and aspirations of the people of Darfur. When the waring parties were in Abuja recently, it was clear that Khartoum was the aggressor, determined to slowly wipe out the people of Darfur. Therfore the civilised community of civilized people should discard the threat from Khartoum.

Bring Khartoum to justice or take justice to them.

--Yomi_Okanlawon

(To reply,
click here.)

The US, Europe, Asia, Russia, nor the UN will come to the aid of Africa. It is a proven fact, disgraceful as it is. The Africans are brave to know it, to recognize it and to act upon it -- completely on their own.

The plight of Africans can only be met with the assistance of private parties. Governments will never be there to stand beside the nations that need them. We must find those who will. We have seen individual efforts from Oprah, Bill Gates, Gen. Roméo Dallaire , the Canadian commanding officer of the UN in Rowanda in 1994, as well as several others whose moral compass is true. But to date these individuals can not stem the tide of violence of their own. More is needed, more people, more resources, more money, more commitment, more arms, more equipment.

Doesn't this sound like something that the American blacks can lend their weight to? Their compass points to freedom, their roots are tied into wealth here, they have direct influence and cause for vested concern about the outcomes there. This is not a racial callout -- there are many here who would join, but it most certainly is a cause that is befitting black leadership. Wouldn't this cause enrich the pride and ground the ambition of those black youth who are unclear about their purpose here in the inner cities? Couldn't a militia be formed, a civil corps of peace keepers trained to fight against chaos and corruption in lieu of the gang wars on the streets of US metropolitan slums? Could this community be rallied for the cause of their homeland? [...]

No other population could do such a powerful good in the world. No other need has ever been so great than those who have suffered for decades on the African continent. The risks of collusion and further corruption are far and away offset by the possibility for good, that one can only hope such a private interest will develop here: The African-American Peace Corps.

Koffi Annan has proven ineffective at bringing the interest of Africa to the world's nations. There is no one else but us. What can we do but call up the best America can offer from among its African American leaders -- who have proven many times their capability in world class events of every genre.

--AfricanWisdom

(To reply,
click here.)

This article presented an interesting close-up view of AU troops succeeding in one small task, where they have been given the tools to succeed. It makes one realize how much success that they and any future UN forces could have if they had more tools and support. Khartoum is following the familiar, tragic pattern of lethal denial, and takes full advantage of the official deference it receives as a sovereign government, no matter how criminally undeserving it is of such respect. Kofi Annan, diplomat that he is obliged to be, must speak of "talks" and "all parties" and "negotiations", but the international community -- including Mr. Annan -- knows that safety for the people of Darfur is absolutely nonnegotiable

--raeann

(To reply,
click here.)

The "Colonel" in the piece wishes to become a UN commander. Why not? His salary and that of his men will increase three fold. Lightly armed compared to the terrorists? That is not a function of the conflict but of the "armies" of Rwanda and similar nations in Africa. Their military does not exist as a power projection force but as an internal more heavily armed police force. They have neither the higher weapons (mortars, anti-tank, artillery, air defense,etc,) or the logistics structure to support them. They pray for a UN mission as tey will all become relatively rich. The officers will syphon off some of the soldiers money, who won't mind much as they still will get a lot more than normal.

The solution is to have real militaries involved in Darfur . A brigade of US Marines or other western forces with an UN mandate, would stop the rebels in their tracks. The problem is that establishes the legitimacy of one side of the struggle. The UN will not do that so how could a foreign government? Millions died in Rwanda while Clinton did nothing. The USA had the ability, it just lacked the will to influence an African situation where there are in reality no good guys.

--stock

(To reply,
click here.)

(6/26)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
Very superstitious.90/091113_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on unemployment.50/091113_TC.jpg
Follow the leaper.1/122939/2183724/DoonesburyPlaceholder.jpg