The "Out to Lunch" DefenseKarl Rove's story doesn't make sense.

Download John Dickerson's latest political podcast here, or sign up for Slate's free daily podcast on iTunes.

Karl Rove testified Wednesday for the fifth time before a federal grand jury about the alleged White House leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity to the press. In December, John Dickerson explored why Rove's previous testimony was chock full of holes: "Rove first testified before the grand jury in February 2004. In that first visit, he said nothing about talking to Time's Matt Cooper. He also didn't mention Cooper in an earlier interview with the FBI. Then, eight months later, in October 2004, Rove returned to the grand jury to alter his earlier account and volunteered that he had talked to Cooper."

PRINTE-MAILRECOMMEND...RSS

FacebookMySpace Mixx Digg Reddit del.icio.us Furl Ma.gnolia SphereStumbleUponCLOSE

SPONSORED CONTENT

• The Maccabees and the Hellenists
  Hanukkah as Jewish civil war.
  James Ponet | Dec. 14, 2009
• The Invisible Hand of God
  Adam Smith thought competition among religions was a good thing. Does Hanukkah prove him wrong?
  Ray Fisman | Dec. 13, 2009
• Mitzvah Mobiles
  Celebrating Hanukkah with menorah parades.
  Michael Lukas | Dec. 11, 2009
• Search for more Recycled articles
• Subscribe to the Recycled RSS feed
• View our complete Recycled archive