chatterbox
columns
- Get Me Rewrite
Dan Balz falls off the momentucrat wagon.
Timothy Noah
posted May 13, 2008 - Defending Hillary
Psst. Her cheap pander on OPEC is good policy.
Timothy Noah
posted May 7, 2008 - Clinton-Wallace Mix 'n' Match
Match the quotation with the angry white male!
Timothy Noah
posted May 5, 2008 - Hillary Clinton, Fairy Princess
Can we please stop pretending she has a plausible chance to win the nomination?
Timothy Noah
posted May 2, 2008 - Peggy Noonan's Litmus Test
Does Obama love Sutter's Mill? America demands an answer.
Timothy Noah
posted April 28, 2008 - Search for more chatterbox articles
- Subscribe to the chatterbox RSS feed
- View our complete chatterbox archive
Objective Correlative WatchA new occasional series in which the inanimate world comments on human folly.
By Timothy NoahPosted Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2005, at 11:33 AM ET
.
The only way of expressing emotion in the form of art is by finding an "objective correlative"; in other words, a set of objects, a situation, a chain of events which shall be the formula of that particular emotion; such that when the external facts, which must terminate in sensory experience, are given, the emotion is immediately evoked.
—T.S. Eliot, "Hamlet and His Problems"
In a not-quite-off-the-record chat last week with Time Warner big shots, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said the court decided to rule on the disputed 2000 election because it didn't want to "give the Florida Supreme Court another couple of weeks in which the United States could look ridiculous." As Al Kamen of the Washington Post pointed out, "appearance-of-ridiculousness" is not a constitutional standard heretofore recognized by legal scholars. According to Lloyd Grove of the New York Daily News (who in writing about Scalia's remarks put Time Warner's senior management into a status-anxious tizzy), Scalia also expressed disagreement with the court's "actual malice" standard for libel (he'd prefer the tripwire be mere "negligence") and called Roe v. Wade an "absurd" opinion.
Mere days later, a large piece of marble fell off the molding of the Supreme Court's 70-year-old facade. According to Reuters, the marble chunk had been positioned above the inscription "Equal Justice Under the Law" and an allegorical figure representing Order.
[Update, 11:30 p.m.: It appears that Reuters had it wrong. If you compare this photograph with this guide to the Supreme Court's exterior statuary, the relevant allegorical figure is Authority, not Order. The larger point still holds.]
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- [audio] Biologists Apologize For Release Of Giant Winged Serpents
Thu, 15 May 2008 01:00:44 -0400 - Piggly Wiggly Scouting Report Indicates J.J. Hardy Enjoys Rib-Eye Steaks
Thu, 15 May 2008 01:00:40 -0400 - Stackley Cup Playoffs Underway
Thu, 15 May 2008 01:00:25 -0400 - » More from the Onion
- Today's Opinions
- Hypocrisy on Hamas
Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - King's Radical Belief
Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - The Danger of Fighting On
Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - » More from washingtonpost.com
- Today's Headlines
- Iraq's Chalabi Loses Post Over Ties to Iran
Thu, 15 May 2008 22:40:19 GMT - Travel: Backpackers Forgo European Vacations
Thu, 15 May 2008 21:02:24 GMT - As His 200th Birthday Looms, the Lincoln Industry Cranks
Thu, 15 May 2008 19:05:35 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- A Stone-Faced Lie on the Mall
Wed, 14 May 2008 18:25:08 GMT - We Hood! We Votin'--and Throwin' It Up!
Wed, 14 May 2008 15:47:07 GMT - Selling Out for a Losing Cause
Wed, 14 May 2008 15:54:12 GMT - » More from The Root

chatterbox









