jurisprudence
columns
- Telling Doctors What To Think
South Dakota's unbelievable new abortion law.
Emily Bazelon
posted July 2, 2008 - Le Trainwreck
The Christie Brinkley divorce is a lesson in how not to cure a broken heart.
Dahlia Lithwick
posted July 2, 2008 - Five Myths About the New Wiretapping Law
Why it's a lot worse than you think.
Patrick Radden Keefe
posted June 25, 2008 - 20 Questions for David Addington
A proposed script for the vice president's chief of staff.
Dan Froomkin
posted June 24, 2008 - Taste-Testing Nutraloaf
The prison food that just might be unconstitutionally bad.
Arin Greenwood
posted June 24, 2008 - Search for more jurisprudence articles
- Subscribe to the jurisprudence RSS feed
- View our complete jurisprudence archive
Blank SlateA Slate reader poll.
By Dahlia LithwickPosted Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2005, at 1:08 PM ET

Harriet Miers told Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., this week that "nobody knows my views on Roe v. Wade." She thus joins a distinguished line of Supreme Court nominees who have ostensibly never discussed this seminal abortion case.
For instance, Clarence Thomas testified at his confirmation hearing that, even though Roe was handed down while he was at law school, he had no recollection of ever discussing the case; he was too busy being married and having a baby and working his way through school to talk about it. When pressed by Sen. Pat Leahy on this point, he insisted he had never "debated" the case and never publicly discussed his position on it.
Turns out, Thomas isn't a huge fan of Roe.
So, we at Slate wonder: How common is it for lawyers and law students and law professors to never, ever throughout the course of their entire careers discuss the merits of Roe v. Wade? Take a minute and answer this simple polling question: How many of you can honestly swear that nobody has ever heard your views on Roe? Nonlawyers are free to answer as well. As are people who have deliberately avoided discussing this or any other case in anticipation of being tapped for the Supreme Court in the future.
Also, if Harriet Miers has in fact discussed Roe with you personally, we would love to hear from you as well. So would the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Kindly send in your answers to .
By mailing us, you give Slate permission to use your name, unless you specify otherwise.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Deciding Vote On Wetlands Preservation Bill Rests With The Littlest Senator
Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:00:00 -0400 - Vatican Tightens Nocturnal Emissions Standards
Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:00:00 -0400 - Heroic PETA Commandos Kill 49, Save Rabbit
Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Capturing The FlagMarc Leepson | From Lincoln's campaign posters to barbeque aprons, the Stars and Stripes sells.
- Today's Headlines
- Q&A: Iranian Diplomat on Tehran’s Role in Iraq
Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:57:21 GMT - A popular July 4th anthem isn't actually American
Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:06:40 GMT - Clift: Clark’s 3 Mistakes on McCain’s War Service
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:31:18 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Bored on the Fourth of July
Thu, 3 July 2008 15:45:55 GMT - Ballin' Without a Budget
Thu, 3 July 2008 15:30:35 GMT - Page Burners
Thu, 3 July 2008 18:30:29 GMT - » More from The Root

jurisprudence









