
KKK vs. KFCThe difference between blacks and animals.
Posted Thursday, Aug. 18, 2005, at 12:43 AM ET
Do animals deserve the same respect as black people?
That's the question posed in an online exhibit by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The exhibit pairs a slave auction with a cattle auction, two hanging black men with a hanging steer, herded Native Americans with herded cattle, a burning black man with a burning chicken, a shackled black ankle with a chained elephant hoof, and a pygmy in a zoo with a monkey in a dress.
The introduction includes a quote from Alice Walker that says animals "were not made for humans any more than black people were made for whites." A quote from Peter Singer says the suffering of enslaved animals "can only be compared with that which resulted from the centuries of tyranny by white humans over black humans."
"What is the common link between all atrocities in our society's past?" asks the opening paragraph. "The African slave trade, the massacre and displacement of Native Americans, the oppression of women, and forced child labor, were the products of a dangerous belief that those with power have the right to abuse those without it." The text concludes that "our generation still operates in the same way. The only difference is that yesterday's victims—used and abused because they were 'different' and powerless—are now of other species."
You can imagine why the exhibit has upset some people. They think it's racist. They're wrong. Racism draws invalid distinctions. PETA does the opposite: It omits valid distinctions. It equates animals, blacks, and whites, because it misunderstands the nature and history of equality. Abuses of blacks, Native Americans, and women were products of a belief in subordinating the inferior, not the powerless. We learned to respect others not for their disabilities but for their abilities. That's why we'll come around eventually—and only partially—to animal rights.
I say this as an animal rights sympathizer. If you ask yourself which practices of our age might come to be seen in hindsight as wrongs we didn't yet comprehend, the increasingly unnecessary killing of higher animals for food is high on the list. But PETA's appeals to pity and piety don't help. Its exhibit accuses our "human-dominated society" of "tyranny," "exploitation," "cruelty," and an "oppressive mentality." It charges that we "take advantage of our power over [animals] for the sake of pleasure and profit." It bleats that they're "powerless," "weaker," and "unable to defend themselves." It asks us to be "compassionate," "caring," and "defend … oppressed groups."
This isn't how white people came to accept racial equality. Racial Attitudes in America, a comprehensive study published by Harvard University Press, offers plenty of evidence that ability was a more salient consideration than guilt or weakness. "Data collected by the National Opinion Research Center … indicate that more than half of the white population surveyed in 1942 assumed that blacks were less intelligent than whites," the study reports. Gradually, this assumption was discredited. Socioeconomic factors in IQ scores were exposed. Unions admitted blacks. President Truman integrated the military. Whites began to see blacks as peers.
By 1977, when NORC began asking people to assess various explanations of persistent social inequality, the percentage of whites who asserted black inferiority had plummeted. Over the next 19 years, the authors note,
Two of the explanations exhibit highly significant trends in opposite directions. In-born ability as an explanation was not heavily chosen (26 percent) even in 1977 when the set of questions was first asked, and by 1996 it was agreed to by only 10 percent of the white population. Taken alone, this decrease might well suggest that explanations in terms of "discrimination" have found increasing support within the white population. On the contrary, discrimination is also mentioned decreasingly, and significantly so, over time.
In other words, whites didn't accept blame for blacks' problems. What they accepted was that blacks had equal ability.
Something like that will gradually happen between humans and animals. Not the equality part—sorry, PETA—but the ability part. Every week we learn something new about animal brainpower. Crows fashion leaves and metal into tools. Ravens understand spying. Pigeons deceive each other. Rats run mazes in their dreams. Prairie dogs make different sounds to denote different animals. Dolphins teach their young to use sponges as protection. Elephants can mimic trucks. Chimps can pick locks. Parrots can work with numbers. Dogs can learn words from context. Caterpillars can build webs to catch snails. Octopuses can use some arms to disguise themselves while using other arms to sneak away.
As technology makes it easier to do without animals for food and labor—a trend illustrated by cars in the present, and laboratory-grown meat in the future—our increasing awareness of animal intelligence will prod us to give up the worst offenses, starting with butchery of higher mammals. We won't do this because we pity them for being locked up. We'll do it because we respect them for picking locks. And we'll still use chimps to test our drugs, because the faculties worth respecting in them are that much more powerful in us. "We Are All Animals," PETA pleads in the title of its exhibit. Yes, we are. But some animals are more equal than others.
Hitchens: The "War on Terrorism" Didn't Cause the Fort Hood Shootings
Enter Slate's Write-Like-Sarah Palin Contest
Whoa! The House Health Care Bill Is Actually Less Expensive Than the Senate's.
Like Israel but Colder: The Jewish Autonomous Region of Russia
Why Everyone Should Read When Everything Changed
Spitzer: How Tim Geithner Was Fleeced by Wall Street












Remarks from the Fray:
When man first started domesticating animals, one of the traits selected for was stupidity. The smarter an animal was, the harder it was to catch to begin with, the harder it was to keep in captivity, and the less likely it was to "tame down." This means that, eventually, a certain amount of intelligence was bred out of our animals. Domestic dogs are not as smart as their wild counterparts, gray wolves. Domesticated cats are not as smart as wild cats. Anyone who has been around cattle knows how stupid they are. Domestic turkeys are just about as dumb as rocks, while wild turkeys are wily and clever. If you're counting on people to recognize the intelligence of cows and chickens before they quit eating them, well, enjoy that burger!
On the other hand, the limbic system of mammals, birds, and reptiles is essentially the same as that of humans. The limbic system is one of the oldest, least evolved parts of the brain, and is responsible for emotion. So you can make a case that cows, turkeys, and even turtles are capable of feeling emotions. Anyone who has ever owned a dog or cat can testify that these animals feel love, fear, shame, and envy--some even have a sense of humor. If your tactic on animal rights is to make them seem human-like, perhaps that is the way to go.
--Archaeopteryx2
(To reply, click here)
It's amazing to watch PETA at work. Is there any group out there that causes cognitive dissonance among people the way this group does? Can you think of anybody who uses the media with the same skill? People, I've found, are often angered when morality is taken to its logical conclusion. When you're right, and it's pissing people off, you know you're onto something.
PETA is probably the most successful progressive group out there – others could learn from them. By establishing themselves as the "looniest" fringe of the animal rights movement, they pull the center leftwards as well. You don't have to be a liberal these days to consider dog fighting to be cruel, for example, or to hold in contempt those who still wear fur coats. And you probably know somebody who is a vegetarian on ethical grounds – and on some level you probably respect that.
A few decades ago, you would have been considered on the fringe if you held these beliefs. I still remember as a child people justifying cruelty to dogs because "they are just dogs". Try that excuse in 2005.
Like it or not, PETA will eventually be proven right. In the future, civilized people will not eat animals and will look at those of us who did in the past with the same combination of pity and scorn that we currently apply to those who owned slaves in the past.
--Danimal
(To reply, click here)
(8/18)