HOME / the middlebrow: Dissecting the mainstream.

Jane FondaWhat does she want from us?

Illustration by Charlie Powell

Those who think Jane Fonda's sole raison d'être is to annoy conservative opinion writers should note this passage from her new memoir, My Life So Far. The year is 1970. Fonda has just engaged in her very first acts of civil disobedience, on behalf of aggrieved Native American tribes. The protests, she writes, "morphed me from a noun to a verb. A verb is active and less ego-oriented. Being a verb means being defined by action, not by title." So there. Jane Fonda aspired to something greater than liberal do-gooding; she wanted to become a part of speech. Fonda (v.): to plead for harmony and social justice until humanity can't take it anymore.

My Life So Far announces the emergence of a new Fonda—what she calls her "Phoenix," poised to lift off from Atlanta at any moment. This follows on the heels of at least four previous permutations of Fonda: the Barbarella sex goddess, the lefty noodge, the aerobics instructor, and, more recently, the tireless Braves fan. What is the new Fonda like? Savvier than "Hanoi Jane" but slightly frailer than the aerobics queen—she faces hip-replacement surgery at the conclusion of her book tour. Previous Fondas wanted our hearts, our minds, our abdominals. What does this new Fonda want from us?

Plainly, not our forgiveness. In the preface of her book, Fonda announces her intention to "set the record straight" about her 1972 adventure in North Vietnam, which remains potent ammunition for the right. (See, for example, the forged photograph of Fonda and John Kerry that turned up during last year's presidential campaign.) But Fonda has little new to say about Vietnam and offers few words of contrition—and these only for posing in front of an anti-aircraft gun, which she says she wandered in front of by mistake. "I carry this heavy in my heart," she writes, an apology that will satisfy no one, least of all the neocon grunts who emerged this week to denounce her on The O'Reilly Factor. The one revelation she offers? That she determined to have a second child after spotting a female North Vietnamese soldier who was manning a gun installation while pregnant.

Nor does Fonda, as she limps into her eighth decade, have much desire to entertain. My Life So Far swells to 579 turgid pages. If it has been suspected that Hollywood memoirs emerge as a byproduct of therapy, Fonda removes all doubt by importing a team of shrinks to elucidate key moments in her life: "Dr. Blumenthal told me that Mother's behavior suggests that she may have been suffering from post-partum depression. …" Only rarely does Fonda unleash the charm-bombs that made her the most winsome actress of the 1970s. She playfully growls at rival diva Faye Dunaway and drops a few absurd Hollywood anecdotes: "[T]here was a loud noise, some plaster fell from the ceiling, and an owl fell onto Gore Vidal's plate."

What Fonda wants, it seems, is a messy public divorce from the men in her life. She says her ever-mutating public image was stage-managed by the men in her life, who sought to mold her in their own image. Most fearsome was her late father, Henry, who treated her and her brother Peter like a pair of particularly unloved pets. Henry Fonda was a cold, churlish man; he is said to have cried only once, upon learning of the death of Franklin Roosevelt. His aloofness drove Fonda's mother, Frances, into a sanitarium, where she committed suicide by cutting her throat. (Fonda, then in grade school, learned the news by reading a film magazine.) Henry drifts in and out of Fonda's life, occasionally reappearing to upbraid her for her nascent activism. This leaves Jane grievously perplexed: How could the man who played Abraham Lincoln, Tom Joad, and Clarence Darrow turn a cold eye to social justice?

Fonda's three husbands prove even more loathsome. She flits from director Roger Vadim to lefty rabblerouser Tom Hayden to Ted Turner, perhaps the only man on the planet whose liberal do-gooding is more schizophrenic than her own. Their union is like the merger of two giant charities. Turner calls Fonda the day after her divorce from Hayden hits the newspapers to ask her out on a date. She demurs. He calls back three months later, and she accepts. She appears in a black miniskirt, halter top, and spike heels, and Turner becomes so frantic that he has to excuse himself six times during dinner to use the toilet. On their second date, at Turner's Montana ranch, the billionaire pleads, "Come on, why don't we make love? Huh?" When Fonda relents, Turner squeals, "Hot dog!" Fonda says little about the prostrate aerobics that follow, though she coyly alludes to the spurting fountains of Versailles. After nine years of marriage, Turner dumps Fonda for what he charmingly refers to as his "backup."

She says you can trace each decade's Fonda to a particular husband. Vadim, a pal of Albert Camus and Henry Miller who preferred his leading ladies to perform in zero-gravity, molded her into a vapid sex goddess. Hayden turned her to further liberal martyrdom and, later, when his charities needed infusions of cash, aerobics. Turner, the most domineering of the three, abhorred Fonda's acting and freelance activism. He wanted a trophy wife and season-ticket partner—hence Fonda's decade-long exile in Atlanta.

The rule-of-man theory ties My Life So Far together in a neat, therapeutic kind of way, but you ultimately feel that Fonda is playing a bit coy. Roger Vadim is dead and largely forgotten; Hayden and Turner's liberal empires have withered. And yet one 60 Minutes segment with Fonda stirs up more Vietnam demagoguery than anything since the unfortunate appearance of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. Perhaps Fonda is so mired in new-age body talk—"my daughter's home had become a womb in which I was pregnant with myself"—that she cannot see that she's outdistanced her former keepers. If "fonda" has indeed become a verb, perhaps what it means is to sell oneself short.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Bryan Curtis, a contributing writer, writes the "Middlebrow" column.
Illustration by Charlie Powell.
COMMENTS

Remarks from the Fray:

The only thing that "liberated" Jan Fonda to write her biographic revelation is the influence of her celebrity. Her journey is not really universal for women so much as typical for many an aging liberal progressive these days. Because, for all her shaping at the hands of the men in her life, her feminist transformation, her capitalist urges, and – most recently – her spiritual awakening, Fonda has remained, at her core, as the same post-World War II New Deal idealist she started as, coming out of girlhood.

Fonda has always struck me as a bit of a paradox. Like some people who grow up introverted and censoring their emotions, her adult life has been dominated by an almost inherent need to be an exhibitionist. Yet she never entirely lost her vulnerability to the opinions, and particularly the critical opinions, of others. Likewise, much of her career has been an attempt to follow, literally and figuratively, in the footsteps of the father whose approval she desperately desired while simultaneously needing to rebel against and even hurt him for his essential coolness toward her…

I have no real qualms with Fonda. I have always thought of her as a proficient and sometimes very good actress. Her politics, along with her aerobics empire, have largely uninterested me. This includes her famous stint in Hanoi. I will agree with her that posing on that gun was an incredibly stupid choice. But perhaps with age I have come to realize and regret too many stupid choices of my own to judge another human life on the basis of any single incident. She pays sufficiently for her sins already in the form of the numerous folks on this planet who continue to judge and damn her without respite based on it.

The only thing she does that sometimes annoys me is to give interviews or write books in which she tries to use her own life as some sort of self-help instruction manual for the masses…

--The_Bell

(To reply, click here)


Mr. Curtis would be well-served to dig deeply into Jane Fonda's activities during the Vietnam war before casually linking her detractors to demagogues or Swift Boat partisans.

I am a center-left Democrat who feels that Fonda has earned her place in the dust bin of history.

Going far beyond acts of civil disobedience and conscience, she traveled to the battle field and posed with those who were leveling their sights on our soldiers. Fonda made statements over North Vietnamese radio that were played over and over again in an attempt to demoralize our POWs, who were being viciously tortured. By any definition, this qualifies as giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

Her lack of contrition is not surprising. What does surprise me is the fact that the edges of her treasonous acts have dulled for some with the passage of time.

--Cicero

(To reply, click here)

(4/7)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
I want to hold your hand.89/091208_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on global warming.18/091208_TC.jpg
They shoot engineers, don't they?90/091208_TD.jpg