explainer
columns
- The 500,000 Artifacts of George Washington
How did archaeologists find half a million objects at one site?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 3, 2008 - Secret Muslims
Are Muslims allowed to hide their faith?
Juliet Lapidos
posted July 2, 2008 - The Spam Superhighway
What's "Port 25," and what does it have to do with Internet junk mail?
Chris Wilson
posted July 1, 2008 - Hostage Rescue for Tots
What was a 3-year-old doing at a paramilitary simulation exercise?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted June 30, 2008 - Rent-a-Hive
How much does it cost to borrow a colony of honeybees?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted June 27, 2008 - Search for more explainer articles
- Subscribe to the explainer RSS feed
- View our complete explainer archive
Do Commandos Go Commando?Soldiers and their skivvies.
By Daniel EngberUpdated Monday, Jan. 10, 2005, at 6:36 PM ET
According to a recent report in Newsweek, the Pentagon may send special forces teams to the Middle East to train, advise, and support handpicked Iraqi soldiers in counterinsurgency techniques. If the United States pursues this plan, our commandos will presumably advise the Iraqis about the finer points of stealth warfare—including what to wear. Which raises one question: Do our commandos really go commando?
Many commandos do forgo underpants when they suit up in the field, but the practice is by no means limited to the special forces. With limited rucksack space and infrequent opportunities to wash up or change clothes, American troops sometimes decide that clean underwear is more trouble than it's worth. In addition, going without can increase ventilation and reduce moisture in a soldier's battle dress uniform, which in turn can minimize his chances of getting a rash or crotch rot, a fungal infection of the groin. (Whether or not they wear underpants, many soldiers use Gold Bond Medicated Powder to prevent these ailments.)
There's no ban on underwear from Central Command, of course, but a number of advisories on military safety do offer tips that could be construed to support the practice. Web sites for the armed forces' safety programs warn that tight-fitting uniforms reduce cooling air flow around the body, and the Manual of Naval Preventive Medicine suggests that heat injury can be avoided by wearing the "least allowable amount of clothing." In addition, pilots and armored vehicle personnel are told during training never to wear underpants made from synthetic fibers. The U.S. Army Safety Center explains that the flame-retardant Nomex suits these combatants use can still transmit enough heat to melt any briefs that aren't 100 percent cotton.
Some soldiers speculate that men in the armed forces are more likely than women to go without skivvies. In the Army, for example, the battle dress uniform contains an awkward crotch seam that can be particularly uncomfortable for women. Brassieres are a different story: For women with smaller breasts, it can be much more comfortable not to wear one in hot weather. But while a man who wears no underwear isn't immediately noticeable, a woman without a bra can draw unwanted attention in the field.
When did the term "going commando" enter the civilian lexicon? The phrase dates back to at least the middle of the 20th century, when Americans used it to mean "toughening up." (That meaning persists to this day in some contexts.) The phrase's more common connotation dates back to at least 1974, when it appeared in a source on college slang. The phrase "crotch rot" emerged during the same period: It first appeared in 1967. It's possible that "going commando" first poked its way into the public consciousness during the Vietnam War, when American special forces were spending extended periods in hot, wet jungle environments. The phrase got its big break in 1996, when Joey and Rachel went commando on an episode of Friends.
Next question?
Explainer thanks David Chasteen of Operation Truth, Capts. Ray and Mindy Kimball of the U.S. Army, Grant Barrett of the Historical Dictionary of American Slang, and Jesse Sheidlower of the Oxford English Dictionary.
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Nameless Hurricane That Much More Terrifying
Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:00:00 -0400 - Bush Acknowledges Existence Of Carbon Dioxide
Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:00:00 -0400 - Stuffed-Animal Biodiversity Rising
Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
That Was FastKrauthammer | Obama's change of heart on Iraq is stunningly cynical.
Dionne: He's Sincere About FaithGerson: And Savvy About It, Too
- Eugene Robinson: African American Patriotism
- Edward J. Larson: The Founding Mudslingers
- Stumped: America, Don't Be Afraid of Mexico
- Today's Headlines
- Clift: Clark’s 3 Mistakes on McCain’s War Service
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:31:18 GMT - Commentary: Fashion Mavens Still Like Light Skin
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:59:21 GMT - Group Lobbies for Reform of Funeral Industry
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:36:47 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Bored on the Fourth of July
Thu, 3 July 2008 15:45:55 GMT - Ballin' Without a Budget
Thu, 3 July 2008 15:30:35 GMT - Page Burners
Thu, 3 July 2008 18:30:29 GMT - » More from The Root

explainer









