tangled web
columns
- The Givers
Using the Web to promote tsunami relief.
David Wallace-Wells
posted Jan. 6, 2005 - Still Raging Against the Machines
Debunking another election conspiracy theory.
Josh Levin
posted Nov. 9, 2004 - Rage Against the Machines
The Web wonders if electronic voting machines stole the election.
Josh Levin
posted Nov. 3, 2004 - The Box on Bush's Back
Rumors, denials, and wild speculation—a comprehensive guide.
Louisa Herron Thomas
posted Oct. 20, 2004 - Rather Suspicious
Searching for answers in the Killian memo controversy.
Josh Levin
posted Sept. 10, 2004 - Search for more tangled web articles
- Subscribe to the tangled web RSS feed
- View our complete tangled web archive
Still Raging Against the MachinesDebunking another election conspiracy theory.
By Josh LevinPosted Tuesday, Nov. 9, 2004, at 5:08 PM ET
In response to my piece on election conspiracy theories, many readers have asked about supposed irregularities in Florida counties that use optical-scan voting machines. In Baker County, where 69 percent of registered voters identify as Democrats, 77 percent of voters went for Bush. Dixie County: 78 percent registered Democrats, 69 percent for Bush. Franklin County: 77 percent registered Dems, 59 percent for Bush. Holmes County: 73 percent registered Dems, 77 percent for Bush. (USTogether.org has more charts and graphs of this data here and here.)
These are just the most egregious examples. If we trust the exit polls, about 90 percent of voters nationwide vote based on party affiliation. That means that, according to USTogether's calculations, if Floridians voted according to party affiliation in the state's 52 optical-scan counties, the GOP would lose about 600,000 votes—perhaps not enough to swing the election, but a huge number nonetheless. The theory goes that since all eyes were on the counties with new touch-screen machines, it would be far easier to futz with the numbers in the less-scrutinized optical-scan counties. Optical-scan machines are used to count paper ballots, and the results are then fed into a computer. If someone could hack into the computer, they could surreptitiously change the vote count.
The big problem with this theory is that this year's results match those from 2000. (And with the exception of Dixie, which used punch cards in 2000, all of these counties used optical-scan machines four years ago.) In 2000, Baker County had 83 percent registered Democrats, and 69 percent of the county's voters went for Bush. Dixie County had 86 percent registered Democrats, and 58 percent went for Bush. Franklin County: 81 percent registered Dems, 53 percent for Bush. Holmes County: 83 percent registered Dems, 68 percent for Bush. (For complete 2000 results in Florida by county, look here. For 2000 results as compared to voter registrations, look here.)
While each of these counties had a lower percentage of Bush voters in 2000 than in 2004, the 2000 election was much closer than this one. Each of these counties also appears to be moving toward the GOP. In all four, there is a lower percentage of registered Democrats and a higher percentage of registered Republicans in 2004 than in 2000.
Of course, you could argue that this similarity to the 2000 results just points to an even bigger conspiracy. But that's a bit, well, crazy. Take a look at the geography: All four counties are either in Florida's panhandle—known by some as the Redneck Riviera—or the northern part of the state. Like their neighbors in Georgia and Alabama, northern Florida voters tend to be very conservative. Baker, Dixie, Franklin, and Holmes counties are represented in the House by two Republicans and a Blue Dog Democrat who lists his No. 1 issue as "Second Amendment rights." Democratic registrations here are more an artifact of history than evidence of massive fraud.
Update, Nov. 10, 2004: For a thorough debunking of the Florida op-scan conspiracy based on an examination of 28 counties in the 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential elections, check out Yevgeny Vilensky's analysis here. Also, it seems there's not much to another alleged scandal that readers have been asking about—Keith Olbermann's report that there were 93,000 more ballots cast than registered voters in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. You can find an explanation for the supposed disparity here.
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- New NFL Rule Will Force Players To Have One Of Three Appropriate Haircuts
Thu, 08 May 2008 01:00:37 -0400 - Number Of Acceptable Things Candidates Can Say Now Down To Four
Thu, 08 May 2008 01:00:34 -0400 - Peanut Allergies May Be Cured
Thu, 08 May 2008 01:00:29 -0400 - » More from the Onion
- Today's Opinions
- Sticking Points for Obama
Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - Too Late to the Duck Hunt
Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - The Card Clinton Is Playing
Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - » More from washingtonpost.com
- Today's Headlines
- Q&A: Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
Fri, 09 May 2008 00:25:08 GMT - Burma Cyclone: Exile Describes Victims' Anger
Thu, 08 May 2008 23:34:04 GMT - The Pentagon, the CIA, and Secret Iran Meetings
Thu, 08 May 2008 22:20:55 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Viva Vogue Italia!
Thu, 8 May 2008 18:17:41 GMT - Jazz: On the Cusp of a New Golden Age
Thu, 8 May 2008 15:36:33 GMT - Oakland A's Envy
Thu, 8 May 2008 17:23:29 GMT - » More from The Root

tangled web









