gaming
columns
- Spore's Intelligent Designer
Will Wright's new hit game is all about evolution. Or is it?
Luke O'Brien
posted Sept. 11, 2008 - Keeping It Unreal
Metal Gear Solid 4 reveals the genius of the world's greatest, weirdest video game designer.
Chris Baker
posted June 24, 2008 - Unjustifiable Carnage, Uneasy Alliances, and Lots of Self-Doubt
What Grand Theft Auto IV gets right about gangland and illegal economies.
Sudhir Venkatesh
posted May 9, 2008 - It's Not Just About Killing Hookers Anymore
The surprising narrative richness of Grand Theft Auto IV.
Chris Baker
posted April 29, 2008 - Smashing Failure
Super Smash Bros. Brawl: a great game—and another fiasco for the Nintendo Wii's pitiful online gaming service.
Jack Patrick Rodgers
posted March 27, 2008 - Search for more gaming articles
- Subscribe to the gaming RSS feed
- View our complete gaming archive
Hide and Go SneakIn the best new games, stealth—not violence—is key.
By Clive ThompsonPosted Friday, July 9, 2004, at 9:29 AM ET

Sometimes I get bored with killing people. When you play a lot of shoot-'em-up games, as I do, you spend hours joyfully mowing down your opponents with sprays of gunfire. But 10 years after Doom, the rampant weapon-play can start to seem tedious. Kill your enemies, reload, kill some more, reload—man, what a drag. You become a pacifist for the weirdest possible reason: not because the virtual violence seems so awful but because it's so bloody repetitive.
Perhaps that's why "stealth" games have become so popular in recent years. These action titles force players to rely on guile and smarts rather than constant killing, and they've created something remarkable: a new style of play—and possibly even a different moral vision.
Recently I've been addicted to Thief: Deadly Shadows, and it's a classic of the genre: The goal is to accomplish missions by sneaking around and avoiding conflict. You don't want to get into fights. In fact, you don't really even want to be noticed, because you're a weak character, easily killed. You can knock people out if you need to, or even kill them. But the latter is only a last resort, because other enemies will notice the blood and noise, call in reinforcements, and overwhelm you. Instead, the best strategy is to lurk in dark corners, where you become essentially invisible. If you're good, your enemies will walk half a foot from you and not see you there.
Philosophers from Machiavelli to Hegel have pointed out that the weak must always pay nervous attention to the behavior of the powerful. That psychology is precisely what makes stealth gaming so gripping: You're always fretfully observing your opponents. To get past a guard, you might spend five minutes just standing there, stock-still, spying on him to figure out his movements, the better to creep by. The upshot is that you feel like a minor character in a play, eavesdropping on conversations as you attempt to unravel Thief's intrigues. (The enemy characters scheme and backbite with positively Elizabethan glee.) It's like a video game designed by Carol Gilligan: You have to pay attention to relationships and monitor everyone's feelings.
I sometimes wonder if stealth games aren't the industry's sheepish response to public unease about blood-soaked shoot-'em-ups. You can practically imagine the designers of shooters getting attacked again and again and again by "family values" pundits until even they started to wonder if there wasn't some alternative. Stealth became an elegant feint out of this endless debate and better yet, an impetus to develop intriguing new game-play: Stealth titles are now some of the most popular games of all. Of course, the idea of sneaking around isn't entirely new—it dates back to Frogger, the ur-stealth title, where you desperately hopped around to avoid traffic.
But stealth has only come of age in the era of 3-D gaming, and I think that's because moving slowly through a game offers an unexpected benefit: Your aesthetic experience becomes much better. Most lightning-fast "twitch" shooter games are so fast-paced you barely have time to notice how wonderfully detailed the 3-D world is. But in Thief, the game-play demands that you slow down and observe your surroundings with the careful attention of Sherlock Holmes. Because you're trying to stay in the shadows, you're forced to study minute design elements. A torch that produces multiple flickering shadows as it shines through a set of medieval pillars is no longer eye candy; those shadows can keep you hidden, and alive. As I hung out on the fringes and quietly waited for an enemy to pass by, I'd actually crane my neck around to check out peaked castle doorways or the cramped, squalid peasant houses I was looting. Stealth turns gamers into tourists.
Still, stealth isn't always a kinder, gentler form of play. Many of these games do, in the end, require you to resort to at least some violence. In the Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell series—another set of highly touted stealth titles, the latest of which is Pandora Tomorrow—there's plenty of gunfire and dead bodies. Indeed, you could argue that while there's less violence in stealth games overall, the violence that does exist is infinitely creepier. Instead of fighting someone fairly and face-to-face, you're always sneaking up from behind and sucker-punching them, like Gollum. In Manhunt, another superb recent stealth game, you actually pop a plastic bag over your opponents' heads and listen to them slowly, achingly gurgle to death. Conflict, it seems, is inevitably messy. You can keep your head down, but your hands will never be entirely clean.
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: Opera Lyrics Blamed For Recent Spate Of Regicides
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: M. Webster's New "Dictionary" Shall Burden Us With A Tyranny Of Words
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:16:40 -0400 - Historical Archives: Benedict Arnold Is A Modern Day's Anthony Babington
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:33:20 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Marcus | Forget Biden. I'd like to see McCain face off against Palin.
Toles: Another McCain SurpriseStumped: Where's Palin's Baby?
- Cohen: How an Economic Crisis Is Like a War
- Froomkin: How's Bush? Put a Fork in Him.
- Milbank: A House Divided Along Twisted Lines
- Robinson: Ugly Politics at Justice | Q&A
- Today's Headlines
- For Kids, No Escape From Porn Imagery
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:50:54 GMT - Are Minorities to Blame for the Subprime Mess?
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:58:57 GMT - The Candidates' Own Questionable Housing Deals
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:40:05 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Home Court Disadvantage
Tue, 7 October 2008 3:02:44 GMT - I Felt Something
Tue, 7 October 2008 2:43:10 GMT - The MILFy Way
Tue, 7 October 2008 1:43:56 GMT - » More from The Root

gaming













