HOME / assessment: Taking stock of people and ideas in the news.

The MatrixIt's Harry Potter with guns.

Illustration by Charlie PowellWhy is The Matrix? The "what" has already been answered: It's an R-rated Star Wars, a sci-fi movie with philosophical pretensions that did shockingly gangbuster business at the box office. The Matrix raked in more than $170 million in the United States, became the first DVD to sell more than 1 million copies, and set the stage for the two most-anticipated sequels of 2003 (at least until The Return of the King comes out). But while The Matrix's commercial success is impressive, it's not mind-boggling. In 1999, four movies—Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, The Sixth Sense, Toy Story 2, and Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me—did better business than The Matrix, and Disney's Tarzan finished only a fistful of dollars behind. What makes The Matrix stand out from that pack is the way it combines mass appeal with a smaller, more intense cult following. No recent movie (other than films with a built-in fan base, like the Star Wars or Lord of the Rings movies) inspires the same kind of slavish, fan-boy devotion. Type the name of a contemporary movie with a similar box-office gross, like Ocean's Eleven, into Google, and you're confronted with a list of official sites and e-commerce pages hawking the movie. Type "the matrix," and you get those sites but also a flood of fan pages—Matrix as Messiah Movie, Knowthematrix.com, the requisite LEGO site, and the sine qua non of movie-geek cult status: the fan-created role-playing game.

What explains the phenomenon? We know it's not the dialogue. Part of the explanation is simple: The mixing of the genres of science fiction and kung fu meant that the Wachowski brothers combined two great cult tastes that go great together. (On one of the featurettes on the Matrix DVD, Andy Wachowski sums up the movie by saying, "It's about robots vs. kung fu.") The movie's startling premise, atmospheric John Woo-style action, and "bullet time" effects go a long way toward explaining the movie's appeal, too. As does the fact that the movie is laden with references and allusions that reward repeated viewings, making fans who recognize them feel as if they and the filmmakers are part of an exclusive, in-the-know club. A by-no-means-complete list includes everything from Baudrillard to Christianity to Descartes to Buddhism to spaghetti westerns to Lewis Carroll to William Gibson's Neuromancer to Jackie Chan's Drunken Master.

But none of these explanations is sufficient. The real source of the fascination with The Matrix is that, despite all appearances, the movie is not a dystopia. Rather, it's a utopia, a geek paradise. The Matrix is a sci-fi John Hughes movie, in which a misfit learns that he's actually cool. (Think Harry Potter with guns.) At the software company where Keanu Reeves works, his boss might as well be the principal castigating Judd Nelson in The Breakfast Club when he says: "You have a problem with authority, Mr. Anderson. You believe that you are special. That somehow the rules do not apply to you. Obviously, you are mistaken." Of course, we learn that the oppressive Figure of Authority is the one who is mistaken. But instead of going to the prom, Keanu gets to pack heat, learn kung fu, wear a black trench coat and sunglasses, and, to top it off, he gets a hot, ass-kicking girlfriend who sports fetish wear. What kind of dystopia is this? No one wants to be Winston Smith in 1984, but everyone wants to be Neo (or Trinity, or Morpheus) in The Matrix.

As Alan Dean Foster puts it in Exploring the Matrix, an anthology of essays by science-fiction writers, Neo is "Everynerd": "His perceived world is a sham, a mistake, a carefully crafted fake, and you know, deep down, that yours is, too." But the movie has a special appeal to that subset of misfit, the computer geek. When we first see Neo, he's living alone in his cramped apartment, staying up all night on his computer. He's a programmer by day and a computer hacker by night. When he is rescued from his miserable existence, he discovers that he and his friends can learn anything—kung fu, how to fly a helicopter—just by downloading it. By the end of the movie, Neo learns that his mastery of the digital Matrix makes him master of all mankind. It's an EverQuest player's dream come true.

There's just one problem: It looks like Neo and his band of revolutionaries want to destroy the technological utopia in which they live. In an essay on the official Matrix Web site, proto-cyborg Kevin Warwick complains about the movie's man-versus-machine approach to technology. "Neo is kidnapped by Luddites, dinosaurs from the past when humans ruled the earth," Warwick writes. "We really need to clamp down on the party-pooper Neos of this world and get into the future as soon as we can—a future in which we can be a part of a Matrix system, which is morally far superior to our Neolithic morals of today." Is Warwick right? After all, if Morpheus, Trinity, and Neo succeed in their quest to liberate humanity from the machines, we'll all be left to eat slop in the dreadful real world of post-apocalyptic earth, rather than becoming fashionista superheroes in the fake world. What kind of liberation is that?

Fortunately, Neo's closing lines in the movie offer a way out of this dilemma. He addresses the machines that have enslaved humanity, and he offers them an olive branch: "I'm going to show these people what you don't want them to see. I'm going to show them a world without you, a world without rules and controls, without borders or boundaries, a world where anything is possible. Where we go from there is a choice I leave to you."

The implication is clear: Neo wants machines and men to coexist in peace. He doesn't want to destroy the Matrix. He just wants people to understand it so they can play with it and enjoy it as much as he does. He's an evangelist for the product.

Neo's not a Luddite. He's an early adopter. Just like his fans.

If you liked this Assessment column, check out Backstabbers, Crazed Geniuses, and Animals We Hate, a collection of our all-time funniest, meanest, sweetest, and weirdest profiles.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Chris Suellentrop reviews games for Slate.
Illustration by Charlie Powell.
COMMENTS

Remarks from the Fray:

Chris Suellentrop has missed the point of geekdom's fascination with The Matrix. It's not about knowing something's rotten at the core of this elaborate techno-construct. It's about all those old values from the '60s—the power of the Individual Who Believes In Himself, the commune as viable social model, technology as nurturing B. F. Skinner Box, achievement without effort (remember drugs?) and a dash of messianic narcissism—updated for the 21st Century. In short, it's a jerk-off dream world, a masturbatory fantasy—so how is it a mystery that geeks would like it? We're talking about geeks, Chris—people who really imagine that they would like to be voyagers on Star Trek, living forever in featureless cubicles, never getting any sun, and surrounded by an ocean of technological toys wherever they go. Oh, and power. You can't really have a teen-age (male) fantasy without power, can you? And whom did the producers choose for their techno-Messiah? Basically, a robot. Keanu Reeves is an actor who makes Brent Spiner's Commander Data feel like Deepak Chopra. Hell, he makes Robby the Robot look warm. Some wag of a critic proclaimed that Reeves was "tragically born too late for silent films." Maybe this is the right approach for an audience that is itself devoid of personality. But that shouldn't be a surprise to anyone, least of all a critic for an online magazine with a sizeable geek contingent comprising its audience.

--rob_said_that

(To reply, click here)



I immediately noticed a religious reference in the movie (since the first movie came out), and also the olive branch is a symbol in christianity that stands for Peace.
Neo is a Savior of sorts, the One as they call it, the only difference is that the Matrix is the reverse of our reality: The Matrix is heaven while their reality is hell, our reality is hell while Heaven is like the Matrix. But at the end, Neo teaches that trough discipline we can control the direction where we are going (yoga, christianity, buddhism, it's all about discipline too) and he shows the olive branch that signifies that we can live peacefully even with the worst of our enemies, the worst of our fears, it's up to us. It gives responsibility to the individual, we are what we want to be, it's all up to us.

--Enigmus

(To reply, click here)



Suellentrop missed it. First he makes numerous assumptions about how the film is perceived. Like any work of art it will be perceived differently by everyone. His whole premise is pessimistic about the subject matter. Words like geek or "Everynerd" and phrases like "that subset of misfit, the computer geek" are condescending and insulting to people who liked The Matrix and to people who would see the sequel. Though I'm a programmer, I never considered myself a geek or a nerd. That might be because of my other interests and careers like flying military transports, car mechanics, and biking to name a few. Of course, those who are predisposed towards liking computers and programming will have an interest in the movie. That doesn't make them geeks or nerds. I seriously doubt that, as Suellentrop says, "...the movie is not a dystopia. Rather, it's a utopia, a geek paradise." He continues his obtuse rant with a quote by Kevin Warwick… I think it goes without saying that no one wants to see humanity reduced to imprisoned pawns with no purpose to their lives other than to provide an electronic super species of computers a source of energy from the electricity their bodies generate. No that's not it. Speaking of Warwick, you could make the very same arguments about AI [aimovie.warnerbros.com]. All these futuristic "dystopias" are warning us of what could go wrong in the future if we aren't careful. Suellentrop says the Neo character "doesn't want to destroy the Matrix... He's an evangelist for the product." Duh. Wouldn't we all like to see a better world improved by computers and technology? But, that's far from giving the go ahead to replace the human species with computers as the highest form of intelligence…

TheMeek

(To reply, click here)


(5/2)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
DOONESBURY FLASHBACK
TODAY'S VIDEO
Nice boots!39/TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on breast cancer.80/TC.jpg
You don't say.86/TD.jpg