explainer
columns
- The Chinese Earthquake Roundup
Can grieving parents have another child? And other questions about the tragedy.
Jacob Leibenluft
posted May 15, 2008 - Can a Dead Woman Vote?
Will the late Florence Steen's absentee ballot count in South Dakota's primary?
Chris Wilson
posted May 14, 2008 - Natural-Disaster Death Tolls
Who's counting?
Juliet Lapidos
posted May 13, 2008 - Were the Dove Ads Retouched?
How to spot Photoshop chicanery.
Jacob Leibenluft
posted May 12, 2008 - How To Make a Skull Bong
A guide for the ultimate deadhead.
Arthur Delaney
posted May 9, 2008 - Search for more explainer articles
- Subscribe to the explainer RSS feed
- View our complete explainer archive
What Does a "Thumbs Up" Mean in Iraq?
By Brendan I. KoernerPosted Friday, March 28, 2003, at 3:51 PM ET
Iraqis are giving passing Americans the "thumbs up" sign, which the troops interpret as a symbol of support. But many veteran travelers insist that the gesture is a crass Middle Eastern insult. How should coalition forces take those skyward thumbs?
Depends on how media savvy those Iraqi bystanders may be. It's true that "thumbs up" traditionally translates as the foulest of Iraqi insults—the most straightforward interpretation is "Up yours, pal!" The sign has a similarly pejorative meaning in parts of West Africa, Russia, Australia, Iran, Greece, and Sardinia, according to Roger E. Axtell's book Gestures: The Do's and Taboos of Body Language Around the World. So, it's possible that the ostensibly cheering Iraqis are, in fact, silently voicing their displeasure.
But it's also possible that they understand the Western meaning of upturned thumbs, an explanation that the Army's Defense Language Institute subscribes to. According to a recent DLI manual on international gestures, after the first Gulf War "Middle Easterners of the Arabian Peninsula adopted this hand movement, along with the OK sign, as a symbol of cooperation toward freedom." Iraqi civilians may have noted this shifting meaning, perhaps via TV reports.
How the thumbs up became an upbeat gesture in the first place is something of a mystery. Legend has it that the signal dates back to Roman gladiatorial contests. A beaten combatant could supposedly be saved from a death blow if the emperor gave the thumbs up; a thumbs down was tantamount to an execution order. Though a favorite of Hollywood "swords and sandals" epics, this explanation has been completely debunked in recent years. In 1997, University of Kansas classics professor Anthony Philip Corbeill concluded that the thumbs up actually meant "Kill him," basing his assertion on a study of hundreds of ancient artworks. Instead, he wrote, a closed fist with a wraparound thumb was the indication for a gladiator's life to be spared.
No one's quite sure about where the positive American connotation comes from, though a good guess ascribes it to an English symbol of agreement. Desmond Morris' Gestures: Their Origins and Distribution traces the practice back to a medieval custom used to seal business transactions. The two involved parties would lick their thumbs, hold them erect, then smush them together. Over time, the mere sight of an upraised thumb came to symbolize harmony and kind feelings.
The gesture's popularization in America is generally attributed to the practices of World War II pilots, who used the thumbs up to communicate with ground crews prior to take-off. American GIs are reputed to have picked up on the thumb and spread it throughout Europe as they marched toward Berlin.
Next question?
Explainer thanks James Felt for asking the question.
Remark from the Fray:
Though the explanation of "Thumbs Up/Thumbs down" was, for the most part, correct I noticed a minor mistake. The reference to the gesture and Roman gladiator games was slightly incorrect. The Thumbs Up gesture was to instruct a winning gladiator to cut the throat of his disarmed or incapacitated rival, where-as the Thumbs Down was to instruct him to lower his sword and allow the rival to live. The response of the emperor or leading head of state at the event was determined by the excitement of the fight, the feelings of the crowd, or the day of the games. If the game was held on a certain day all losers would be spared, had they not been already killed before the ruling gesture could be given.
--Kainskrieg
(To reply, click here)
(3/29)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- [audio] Biologists Apologize For Release Of Giant Winged Serpents
Thu, 15 May 2008 01:00:44 -0400 - Piggly Wiggly Scouting Report Indicates J.J. Hardy Enjoys Rib-Eye Steaks
Thu, 15 May 2008 01:00:40 -0400 - Stackley Cup Playoffs Underway
Thu, 15 May 2008 01:00:25 -0400 - » More from the Onion
- Today's Opinions
- Hypocrisy on Hamas
Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - King's Radical Belief
Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - The Danger of Fighting On
Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT - » More from washingtonpost.com
- Today's Headlines
- Iraq's Chalabi Loses Post Over Ties to Iran
Thu, 15 May 2008 22:40:19 GMT - Travel: Backpackers Forgo European Vacations
Thu, 15 May 2008 21:02:24 GMT - As His 200th Birthday Looms, the Lincoln Industry Cranks
Thu, 15 May 2008 19:05:35 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- A Stone-Faced Lie on the Mall
Wed, 14 May 2008 18:25:08 GMT - We Hood! We Votin'--and Throwin' It Up!
Wed, 14 May 2008 15:47:07 GMT - Selling Out for a Losing Cause
Wed, 14 May 2008 15:54:12 GMT - » More from The Root

explainer









