
A Sluggish War on IndolenceWhy the Bush administration's anti-obesity campaign is doomed.
Updated Thursday, Aug. 22, 2002, at 3:03 PM ET"Verb: It's what you do." That's the slogan the Bush administration thinks is going to inspire "tweens"—kids between 9 and 13—to get off their duffs and get active. To that end, the administration has pledged $190 million to an ad campaign that's supposed to lead the charge in reducing childhood obesity.
Announced with great fanfare last month, the campaign came with the familiar staggering statistics: The number of overweight adolescents has tripled since 1980. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Verb" is the government's way of fighting back. The first TV ad debuted in late July, on Disney and Nickelodeon, showing a computer-simulated girl diving into a swimming pool full of words such as "twist," "run," and "jump," accompanied by a voice-over that says, "Everywhere you go, everywhere you look, there are verbs out there just waiting for you to get into."
Childhood obesity is a serious health problem that certainly warrants national attention. (The Centers for Disease Control maintains a useful Web page for calculating whether your child is overweight. It also has one for adults.) But as a marketing campaign, "Verb: It's what you do" fails to deliver on so many levels that it's hard to believe it was created by a top-flight advertising conglomerate:
- It's vague. Traditionally, public service announcements have tended to stick to a simple, straightforward message: Buckle up, eat five vegetables a day, just say no, read a book, etc. But the new obesity campaign promotes the far more nebulous concept of an "active lifestyle." The new commercials are designed to alter kids' notion of what's "cool" by creating "buzz" that will translate into activity and, eventually, skinnier kids. This indirect methodology explains why the ads are so inscrutable.
- Grammar isn't sexy. Even if teens understand the message, it's not clear that a campaign built around the concept of "Verb" will strike them as hip. More likely, it will remind them of dreary school-day afternoons spent diagramming sentences.
- The Web site stinks. Donated by AOL, it peddles lame "gizmos" such as Verb stickers you can print out to put on your skateboards; Verb paper airplanes; Verb kites; and a Verb desktop pattern that, self-defeatingly, will keep youngsters' eyes glued to their computers. (That's what AOL really wants, isn't it?) And it's only a matter of time before Rev. Donald Wildmon accuses the Web site of encouraging sexual promiscuity:
VERB isn't what you think. It's about doing your thing —or finding a new thing. And you can do it whenever, wherever, and with whoever you want (maybe even famous people).
The site doesn't even have a link to the newly energized President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports, which actually does have helpful tips on diet and exercise (and also much better TV commercials).
Mike Greenwell, communications director for the chronic disease branch of the Centers for Disease Control, which is overseeing the campaign, says the initial ads this summer are simply "brand seeding." More complex ideas will come later. The Verb project was supposedly modeled after the successful "Truth" campaign created by anti-tobacco activists. But in that campaign, the branding strategy worked only because the ads themselves were edgy and direct. (One TV ad, for instance, makes much of the fact that both cigarettes and dog feces contain ammonia.) The Truth campaign was successful because it took tobacco companies to the mat, in a way no one had before, for selling products that make people sick. The "brand" was largely superfluous. Making a parallel obesity campaign would require juxtaposing slaughterhouse shots with McDonald's Big Macs or showing close-ups of the bugs used to create the red dye in most candy and soda. But that was never going to happen, if only because the campaign was crafted by Publicis Groupe, which makes TV commercials for … McDonald's. Indeed, the campaign's corporate sponsors are a virtual Who's Who of the couch-potato industry—in addition to AOL, they include Disney, DC Comics, Primedia, and Viacom.
Even if you buy Greenwell's "brand seeding" argument, branding is a complex process that takes a long time and only works through repeated exposure over a variety of media. But that seems unlikely to happen, too, because President Bush has already pulled the plug on the "Verb: It's what you do" campaign. His 2003 budget doesn't ask for another penny for it.
E-mail Timothy Noah at .
The Least Fun Thing About Video Games: Friendly Fire
Why Is It Such a Big Deal That We Found Water on the Moon?
A Place So Beautifully Sad, It Makes Me Want To Paint
Help! I Got My Co-Worker's Sister Pregnant!
So Will Harry Reid's Health Reform Bill Ruin Medicare or Not?
The Obama Administration Is Giving This Gitmo Detainee a Raw Deal












Notes From The Fray Editor:
Like all articles on obesity, this one generated dozens of posts hectoring people to stop eating (as much, as much fat, fast food, soda, and so on). What was new in this batch was the seemingly effortless link many posters made between political liberals and overweight kids (such as here and here). The two posts below took the time to think about the campaign and offered competing reasons for (what its target audience might call) its suckiness: condescension and greed. Let The Fray sort them out.
Remarks From The Fray:
…The primary problem with the VERB site (and what makes it singularly pathetic) is that it tries to teach kids something while assuming, down to its pixellated marrow, that kids are fundamentally unteachable. Go there and you'll see what I mean. Just click around on any button besides "Station" (which leads to a dull collection of public service announcements) and you'll be treated to: a) a grand total of 3 sentences worth of text; and b) a cheesy animation/theme song combo that looks and sounds like the opening crawl of a porno flick.
Which brings me to what's REALLY bizarre about this site, and this project in general. Kids since the dawn of time have been naturally hyperactive, and, at the age group the project is supposedly aimed at, OUGHT to be as likely to run someplace as to walk there, even if there's no reason to hurry. To the extent that kids habits have changed, they owe it to overeating, carbohydrate-n'-sugar laden "food products", and the amount of time they spend in front of video screens. Is another screen really the answer?
And finally. . . the site insults kids, fat and otherwise, by not being clear about its purpose. It never -ever- tells kids WHY they're supposed to be active; no mention of their health, just a vague implication that "doing stuff is fun". (Yes. . . but WHY? And what are they supposed to be doing?)
Instead of spending money on after school activities or public parks, the government has decided to "educate" kids without actually telling them anything, and to "excite" them by persuading them to sit in front of their computer screens.
-- Thrasymachus
(To reply, click here.)
The fact is, this anti-fat campaign is poor because it's authors don't care. They've whipped up another politically safe slew of messages that'll make a lot of networks and producers some good money, but are practically invisible to their supposed target audience. If this was a personal thing - get the word out that your own kid has been kidnapped - I'm sure the writers could have come up with something more compelling. As it is - a chance to make some bucks and win some awards with no one smart making any demands on the quality - you get what you'd expect.
Today, I saw on some morning TV show that some designer has come out with a new series of flattering fashions for fat kids, and there was a parade of grossly obese kids blubbering down the runway, showing off all the self-esteem that having *fashions* for them can inspire. That's what the money is doing in this country, and you can bet they're on the winning side.
Don't fight the fat, they're betting. Go with it. Sell to it. Flatter it and make it feel worthwhile, even kind of special. Wrap it up in political correctness - these are great kids, and we need to recognize that real people look like that, and everyone's good looking, and they deserve to be recognized as beautiful too. Right?
God help us all. Now we can't even just encourage our kids to be healthy.
We'll get what we deserve, though. A bunch of psychopathic, idiotic video-addicts, with little or no thought of their own, with no strength of body or character, unhealthy in spirit and flesh, weak and docile, sucking on the teat of the world. A fine heritage for Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, Henry, and Lincoln indeed.
– Peter Marshall
(To reply, click here.)
(8/23)