explainer
columns
- Can Bug Spray Explode?
The hazards of aerosol insecticides.
Amaka Maduka
posted July 25, 2008 - How Healthy Are Truckers?
What it takes for a commercial driver to pass the government physical.
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 24, 2008 - How Do You Diagnose Autism?
Michael Savage thinks doctors are getting it wrong.
Juliet Lapidos
posted July 22, 2008 - Pre-emptive Presidential Pardons
Can you be pardoned for a crime before you're ever charged?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 21, 2008 - What's a Bank Run?
And how do you get on the FDIC's secret problem list?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 18, 2008 - Search for more explainer articles
- Subscribe to the explainer RSS feed
- View our complete explainer archive
When Can You Make a Reporter Testify?
By Brandt GoldsteinPosted Tuesday, June 25, 2002, at 11:06 AM ET
The United Nations war crimes tribunal ordered former Washington Post reporter Jonathan Randal to testify in the trial of Radoslav Brdjanin, a Bosnian Serb official accused of ethnic cleansing. Randal interviewed the accused criminal in 1993, and the court wants him to confirm the accuracy of the quotes in his story.
William Safire attacked the court's order in Thursday's New York Times, warning that the ruling could endanger reporters and harm their ability to gather news. But would Randal have been treated any differently by an American court?
In a New York state court, probably not. Journalists are protected in most states by "shield laws," which safeguard the press from having to reveal the identity of sources or other information sought by the government. Some shield laws, including New York's, protect journalists from testifying about nonconfidential matters like an on-the-record interview—unless the information is critical for the prosecution and unavailable elsewhere.
The information sought here isn't critical. Prosecutors are presumably building their case on evidence more damning than Randal's 1993 interview, in which Brdjanin talks about pushing non-Serbs out of Bosnia. There's also a better source for the same information: the translator on whom Randal relied to interview Brdjanin.
But there's a twist to this case that probably would force Randal to testify in a New York court. According to Safire, Randal voluntarily spoke with a U.N. investigator and verified the accuracy of his article. Bad move. Under New York law, by discussing the article with, say, a detective, Randal would waive his journalistic privilege. In which case he'd have to slog into court, at least to testify on the accuracy of the story.
Next question?
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Can't Go Wrong With A Cheeseburger, Area Man Reports
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:00:21 -0400 - Courageous E-mail To Boss In Drafts Folder Since December
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:00:05 -0400 - Novak Hits Pedestrian With Corvette
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:00:45 -0400 - » More from the Onion
| Pundits and diplomats respond.
Robinson: Sunshine in BerlinToles: Obama the UniterTelnaes: Meanwhile, McCain
- Froomkin: How to Get Away With Torture
- Milbank: (Not an) Impeachment Hearing
- Achenblog: My Bias Against Media Bias
- Krauthammer: Maliki Votes for Obama
- Today's Headlines
- Poll: Hispanic Voters Back Obama by Wide Margins
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:04:26 GMT - Opinion: Germans See Themselves in Obama
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:53:52 GMT - How the Mosley Orgy Ruling Could Affect U.K. Media
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:34:59 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Over the Rainbow: Angie and Jo
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:21:23 GMT - The New Tavis Smiley, Beware!
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:27:58 GMT - Go for the Bronze
Fri, 25 July 2008 4:18:27 GMT - » More from The Root

explainer









