explainer
columns
- How Do You Diagnose Autism?
Michael Savage thinks doctors are getting it wrong.
Juliet Lapidos
posted July 22, 2008 - Pre-emptive Presidential Pardons
Can you be pardoned for a crime before you're ever charged?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 21, 2008 - What's a Bank Run?
And how do you get on the FDIC's secret problem list?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 18, 2008 - So Help You, Dog
How does a canine cop become a "sworn officer?"
Brian Palmer
posted July 18, 2008 - Blind Reading
Why would booksellers buy a title without knowing anything about it?
Noreen Malone
posted July 17, 2008 - Search for more explainer articles
- Subscribe to the explainer RSS feed
- View our complete explainer archive
Can New York Bowdlerize Elie Wiesel?
By Kate TaylorPosted Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 5:06 PM ET
The New York Times reported Sunday that New York's standardized English exam has bowdlerized passages by well-known authors, deleting references to race, religion, sex, nudity, alcohol, and anything else deemed "offensive." Can the authors or their publishers sue?
Yes. They could sue the New York Department of Education under either trademark or copyright law. Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act (also known as the U.S. Trademark Act) forbids false attribution of a product. Because the alterations to the passages distort their intended meaning, the authors could argue that the work attributed to them is not really theirs.
They could also sue under copyright law. The New York Department of Education did not secure the permission of the authors or their publishers to print the passages on the exam. Usually, that's not illegal: A portion of the federal copyright code—known as fair use—allows the reprinting of short excerpts for educational purposes. But in this case, the authors could argue that distorting their work hardly qualifies as fair use.
Bonus Explainer: The Lanham Act has been invoked in this way before. In 1975, ABC broadcast a program by the British comedy group Monty Python, of which 24 of the original 90 minutes had been cut to make time for commercials and to remove offensive material. Python was horrified by the mutilation and sued ABC. In Gilliam v. American Broadcasting Companies, a U.S. court of appeals judge agreed that ABC had injured the group's reputation by televising a program that was "a mere caricature of their talents." ABC was forbidden from rebroadcasting the show.
Next question?
Explainer thanks Leon Friedman, general counsel for PEN America, and Jane Ginsburg of Columbia Law School.
Reader Comment From The Fray:
So what's the problem? Isn't this what a politically correct America wants? If we wipe out negative and offensive literature, and our bad history, we unlearn the stupid things we have done as a society. Societies in search of revolutionary change often rewrite history. Why should we be any less prone to being human!
--Yankee
(To find or answer this post, click here.)
(6/5)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- [audio] Hewlett-Packard Introduces New Soup-Resistant Laptop
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:00:09 -0400
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:00:27 -0400- Queen Elizabeth II Announces She's Pregnant Again
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
A Grand TourDavid Broder | While the stars align for Obama, McCain is looking like the odd-man-out on foreign policy.
Annette Heuser: A Honeymoon
- David Ignatius: Middle East Peace for Dummies
- Robert Novak: Scandal at the Pentagon
- Dana Milbank: Sorry We Asked, Sorry You Told
- Jamie Barnett: Defending Our Values
- Today's Headlines
- Democrats Ignore Mukasey Plea for New Gitmo Law
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:17:16 GMT - John Mellencamp Tackles Race, Politics in New Album
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:44:03 GMT - Readers Fired Up By Teen-Pregnancy Issue
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:30:57 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Burden of Proof
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:06:08 GMT - Obama in Berlin
Tue, 22 July 2008 15:20:11 GMT - When Thugs Cry
Wed, 16 July 2008 18:25:58 GMT - » More from The Root

explainer





