ad report card
columns
- The Pill Killer
Can a new ad make a contraceptive vaginal insert seem cool?
Torie Bosch
posted Sept. 29, 2008 - In a World Where You Can Smoke Weed in a Movie Trailer ...
The rise of the R-rated preview.
Josh Levin
posted Sept. 16, 2008 - The Advertising Olympics
The best and worst commercials from the Summer Games.
Josh Levin
posted Aug. 21, 2008 - Ads We Hate
The most annoying commercials in the universe.
Seth Stevenson
posted Aug. 11, 2008 - Buy This Car Because It's Ugly
Scion's peculiar new ad campaign.
Seth Stevenson
posted July 28, 2008 - Search for more ad report card articles
- Subscribe to the ad report card RSS feed
- View our complete ad report card archive
Unapologetic 7 UP
By Rob WalkerPosted Tuesday, May 28, 2002, at 2:35 PM ET
Some weeks ago Ad Report Card addressed the debut of the new unspokesman for the lemon-lime soft drink 7 UP. A newer ad in the series has lately kicked up a small fuss, and in fact the spot is apparently no longer appearing on television. But for the moment at least, you can still see it at 7 UP's Web site (using either Windows Media Player or QuickTime).
The ad: Godfrey, the theatrically clueless mouthpiece for the brand, addresses the camera: "They say if you're going to sell something, get yourself a captive audience." A prison gate slams shut in front of him. Godfrey is then shown walking along a row of cells, handing sodas to inmates and musing, "This place is gonna be a gold mine!" Then he drops a can, starts to bend over—but stops. "I'm not picking that up!" he says, flashing a big knowing grin. He passes an inmate who is squirreling away a can of 7 UP for safekeeping, and then he is on the wrong end of a food-throwing melee in the cafeteria. Next he sits next to a prisoner who has "Evil Ways" tattooed on his hands; Godfrey is shown to have "Lemon Lime" scrawled on his, and he says with exaggerated gravity, "I'm just trying to fit in." The spot ends with him in a cell with a scary-looking prisoner. Godfrey says, "When you bring the 7 UP, everyone is your friend!" The creep puts his arm around Godfrey and stares at him. Godfrey: "OK. That's enough being friends." And then, as his camera crew seems to be leaving him behind bars with his new "friend," he adds with mild alarm, "Where you going?"
The controversy: Mostly this is just another rehash of 7 UP's gimmick of using a spokesman who is such a dimwit that his attempts to "market" the drink are supposedly hilarious: Since 7 UP is the "uncola," it has an unspokesman presiding over an unmarketing campaign. The idea of showing up at a prison to get a "captive audience" is of a piece with this theme. Maybe you think it's funny; maybe you don't. Either way, it's just another variation of a joke 7 UP has been riding for years.
But the bit about refusing to bend over in prison and the closing scene of Godfrey nervously contemplating what form "being friends" might take behind bars—well, that got some attention. A million stand-up gags, prison dramas, and the occasional earnest news report have already made most people familiar with the notion of male rape behind bars. Nevertheless, not everyone thought it was an appropriate subject for a goofball TV ad. A spokesperson for Stop Prison Rape commented to MotherJones.com, "People would never joke about rape outside the context of prison." The soft-drink maker shrugged off such complaints with this iron logic: "The commercial was very well received by consumer audiences." In other words, prison rape is a perfect subject for a goofball TV ad. Right?
Unsorry: So far, so typical. But the latest development is that late last week 7 UP apparently changed its mind and yanked the ad, the first time the company has ever done such a thing, according to Zap2it.com. (Thanks to reader Brian Snell for sending that story.) This time someone from 7 UP explained that the folks who complained "had some very valid points about the ad being able to be interpreted a different way from what we intended."
Yeah? What possible alternative interpretation could there be for Godfrey's winking announcement that he refuses to bend over? This is standard procedure for marketers who go all out to push the boundary of taste and then plead innocence when they cross it, resorting to weasely statements that assign responsibility to no one and express regret for nothing. Still, this particular example is memorable for the double layering—the problem is "the ad being able to be interpreted" in a certain way. This is not even an admission that it ever was interpreted negatively, just that it's possible that it might have been. That's some unapology.
Reader Comments From The Fray:
The 7 UP commercial was pretty tasteless, no doubt about it. But those jokes would have been pretty standard fare on virtually comedy show being broadcast today. Indeed, if the 7 UP spot had aired as a fake commercial on Saturday Night Live, nobody would have batted an eyebrow, except perhaps to thank the producers for not mentioning priests!
Why are commercials held to a higher standard of propriety than actual shows? It's not that commercials are supposed to be in good taste! And it's definitely not that commercials are supposed to be more intelligent. It's not even that they aren't supposed to be racy; I've seen underwear ads that made me want to go looking for my ex-girlfriends' telephone numbers. No. . . I think it's simply that commercials aren't supposed to offend anyone. They aren't supposed to run even the slightest risk of offending anyone, because, unlike the shows themselves, commercials have to generate positive interest to be effective. With the actual shows, however, all that's important is that people watch.
Or is that no longer the case? Maybe corporations are on the brink of realizing that what's good for the goose is good for the gander, and that their sales profiles will be best served if they keep themselves conspicuous--by any means necessary.
--Thrasymachus
(To find or answer this post, click here.)
"He passes an inmate who is squirreling away a can of 7 UP for safekeeping…"
I don't think so. He was putting it in a sock to hit someone over the head. What do you think?
--Bryan
(To find or answer this post, click here.)
The Un-cola's unwillingness to be uncommon and unattach themselves from an unfunny, unavailing un-ad is neither unbelievable or unsurprising. Undoubtedly, they are unencumbered with being unapt and unauspicious in their unbecoming unaccountability
--RGS
(To find or answer this post, click here.)
(5/29)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: A Jest For You
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: Hay Thieves Strike Again
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: John Jacob Astor Out Looking For Beaver
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
PostPartisan: The DebateRobinson | Punch, Counterpunch
Gerson: Two McCain SuccessesKing: Straight Out of a SitcomMeyerson: Old John
- Dionne: Who Is John McCain, Really?
- Ignatius: In Praise of Complete Sentences
- Parker: Wake Me When the Debate Starts
- Editorial: Their Pre-Meltdown Mind-Set
- Today's Headlines
- Economic Crisis: Europe's Response
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:43:06 GMT - What America's Smartest Women Say About Sarah Palin
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:46:41 GMT - Personal Finance: Conservative Investing
Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:53:19 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- An Obama-Palin Ticket
Thu, 9 October 2008 18:16:56 GMT - Love the Player, Hate the GM
Thu, 9 October 2008 21:10:07 GMT - Schooling McCain on the Man Code
Thu, 9 October 2008 20:03:04 GMT - » More from The Root

ad report card













