HOME / culturebox: Arts, entertainment, and more.

Oscars: The Grouch

Sounds of Sweep

Posted Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 9:16 PM ET

Who are these people?

Sounds of sweep, emanating from our TV room. And we think that Benecio Del Toro was funnier than Whoopi Goldberg. And we didn't understand the opening movie, either. Were they selling the idea of movies? Do they need selling to an audience willing to spend three hours in a bathos of self-celebration? And what was with the hideous outfit on Whoopie? We think also it wouldn't have been horrible if Jennifer Connelly had looked up as she read her speech. No surprises so far. We are all quite happy about Black Hawk Down (bad sign for the Rougies), in particular the cinematographer in the room, who also voted for it. This is also a good sign for a Ridley upset. There is a strong Lord of the Rings male bias just picked up in the room, a kind of testosterone pull. … Same contingent horrified by the feathered coat on the make-up winner. Later ...

Sounds of Sweep

Posted Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 9:16 PM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
David Edelstein is Slate's film critic. You can read his reviews in "Reel Time" and in "Movies." He can be contacted at . Lynda Obst is producer of How To Lose in a Guy in 10 Days and author of Hello, He Lied.
Photograph of Halle Berry on Slate's Table of Contents by Gary Hershorn/Reuters.
COMMENTS

Notes From The Fray Editor:

Dira Necessitas said "I love Denzel, but Crowe was robbed" and touched off a long argument. Other topics of interest were Halle Berry's speech (many posts, few defenders), Gwyneth Paltrow's dress (no compliments), and Russell Crowe's choice of roles (one post, strong if slightly wild views).


Reader Comments From The Fray:


See, this is what really depresses me about Hollywood and its movies. Ron Howard makes consistently squishy, feel-good movies that are just next-door-to-really-good enough that he gets Oscars, or is at least a real contender for one. He could put that manipulativeness to work for him and turn out some really brilliant films if he could get rid of the Here Comes the American Hero attitude (I think he played the Opie and Ritchie Cunningham roles too long.) A bit of a darker, more cynical attitude could have boosted several of his films to another level altogether. Imagine Apollo 13 directed by a cross between Howard and David Lynch. Doesn't that sound like a good idea? Actually, given Lynch's films, he would have been a much better choice for director of A Beautiful Mind. We would have gotten a really good view of a schizophrenic mind, I think...

--Kathleen

(To find or answer this post, click here.)


So maybe the Academy gave into some sentimentality and political correctness. So what? If it was the triumph of style, it was not at any great sacrifice to substance. Rather, I think Hollywood brought substance to the rest of us this year with their stylistic choices. Through some partly deserved and partly symbolic gestures, they set an example and gently reminded the rest of us as a society that of which we are capable but have yet to achieve fully. Indeed, in Hollywood at least, the only two remaining groups snubbed by Oscar are wizards and hobbits - and there is always next year!

--The Bell

(To find or answer this post, click here.)

(3/25)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
DOONESBURY FLASHBACK
TODAY'S VIDEO
Big bellies.86/091124_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on entertainment.5/091124_TC.jpg
Company.99/091124_TD.jpg