HOME / culturebox: Arts, entertainment, and more.

Wolfgang Amadeus CopycatDid Mozart plagiarize?

It's a testament to playwright Peter Shaffer's pen that to this day when people hear the name Mozart, the image of Amadeus' whimsically childish genius replete with glass-shattering cackle instantly comes to mind. Yet beyond the liberty Shaffer took with Mozart's personality, two important exaggerations of his remain in our collective imagination: Mozart's supposed abilities to both instantly conjure masterworks of the utmost ingenuity and then to perfectly dictate them from his head to staff paper in the form we now hear them.

In fact, Mozart wasn't only more workmanlike than many of us think, crafting numerous sketches and drafts of his pieces just like other composers. He was what you might politely call a "creative collaborator."

Or so a new recording by the Boston Baroque orchestra would have it. Thanks to the research of University of Northern Iowa musicologist David Buch, The Beneficent Dervish is more than simply an interesting world premiere. It's evidence that Mozart wasn't quite as inventive in the writing of The Magic Flute as previously thought.

The Beneficent Dervish was composed by several players from Mozart's circle and based on librettos from the same book as The Magic FluteDschinnistan, by Christoph Martin Wieland, a writer of so-called "Oriental" fairy tales. Like The Magic Flute, it's a singspiel—an opera made of musical numbers interspersed with spoken dialogue. Both were performed in Vienna's Theater auf der Wieden in the final decade of the 18th century, and both were pet projects of the theater director (and Mozart's first Papageno, a major character in Flute) Emanuel Schikaneder.

But here's where the story gets interesting. According to Buch's recently conducted research—based on the discovery of an audience member's diary, a book of vocal texts found in the Austrian National Library, and old newspaper ads—Dervish was performed before The Magic Flute was written and was very likely heard by Mozart. Both Dervish and Flute feature princes as their protagonists as well as simple jester-sidekicks. In Flute, the latter is Papageno, the lovably dopey bell-ringing man-bird; in Dervish, it's Mandolino, a wacky fisherman with a magic fool's cap and—ding, ding!—a set of bells too. Both sidekicks have female counterparts (Mandolino with Mandolina, Papageno with Papagena); the princes share their mission—to win a princess—with the help of a secret observer; and magic everyday items serve as important props.

Even the music is somewhat similar, despite Dervish being a far less cohesive, intelligent, and grandiose work. Dervish's overture opens with three stately chords, just like the Magic Flute's—many people remark on Mozart's interest in the mythical and Masonic importance of the number 3. Dervish features an aria almost identical to Papageno's famous anthem. And bells, a brand-new operatic element at the time, are used in both pieces.

Calling Mozart a plagiarist would be going too far; the musicians from within his theatrical community borrowed freely from each other as colleagues and partners who made livings off ticket sales. And it's not uncommon for classical-music composers to quote one another; using age-old tunes like the dirgey Dies Irae (used most notably in Berlioz's Symphonie Fantastique), chorales of Bach (in tons of music from the Baroque to the present day), or famous folk tunes like the Eastern European melody that first appeared in Smetana's Moldau and later showed up in Naftali Herz Imber's score for the Jewish "Hatikva." Usually, fear of being called derivative—one of classical music's most serious insults—is enough to keep composers from out-and-out plagiarism. But it does happen, and the borrowers aren't always second-tier hacks, either. Beethoven used Pachelbel's Canon in the rondo of his Op. 28 Piano Sonata somewhat sneakily; Richard Strauss took 50 themes from Vittorio Gnecchi's 1905 opera Cassandra for use in Elektra in what was less tribute than underhanded grab. Shostakovich commented on the whole issue of theme-stealing himself with his use of "We Wish You a Merry Christmas," an instantly recognizable tune, in his sarcastically witty Prelude No. 15 in D Flat, Op. 87.

Ironically, The Beneficent Dervish lived on only because it was lifted: If Mozart had never lived, it surely would have disappeared into the ether. Which may be why Mozart took it in the first place: He probably thought little of the common singspiels performed around him in 18th-century Vienna and never counted on assiduous musicologists like David Buch digging them up. His presumption is damning but also humanizing: It turns out that classical music's most enigmatic genius was either a casual copycat, one of the boys, or, more realistically, a little bit of both.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Adam Baer, a violinist and writer in New York, is a contributor to Before and After: Stories From New York.
Selections from The Benificent Dervish performed by Boston Baroque © 2002 Telarc; The Magic Flute performed by the Orchestra of the Bavarian State Opera Munich © 1987, 1973 EMI Electrola GmbH. All rights reserved.To the 500-plus Slate readers who entered "The Book Club" contest: We're reading as fast as we can. Results soon, we promise, and thanks for being patient.
COMMENTS

Reader Comments From The Fray:

There is a big difference between plagiarism and inspiration. Serious music uses inspiration from many sources in the creative process, including folk melodies, popular melodies, and other composers' works. If one composer writes a series of variations on the theme of another, is that plagiarism or using inspiration to create a new work? Mozart saw nothing wrong with using material that would be familiar to his contemporaries as inspiration for his creativity. Early in his career he wrote variations on a French folk song (which has led many people to erroneously think he wrote the tune to Twinkle, twinkle little star). The fact that he didn't actually write the melody takes nothing away from the charm of the piece.

Furthermore, I seriously doubt that Mozart would care whether or not we knew that he borrowed heavily from another work. Certainly his contemporaries would have known, and they were probably flattered that he used it to create a new and better work.

--mav62

(To find or answer this post, click here.)


"Dervish's overture opens with three stately chords, just like the Magic Flute's"

These are called "hammer strokes"…In the days before electricity, there was no public announcement system. The musicians had to announce themselves at the commencement of their performance. These dramatic chord strokes can be found at the beginning of many pieces of the day. It is the period way of saying, "Hey! We're starting here! Sit down and shut up!"

--Cavalaxis

(To find or answer this post, click here.)


Some of the web research I did indicated that Mozart may have been involved to some extent with the writing of "The Beneficent Dervish". Can one plagiarize oneself?

--Ganga

(To find or answer this post, click here.)


We have changed our laws and changed our standards, and in many ways not for the better. By allowing one artist to sue another for composing a derivative work, we disrupt the normal flow of the composition process in order to bow at the altar of the false god of originality. By protecting copyrights for the life of the author plus 70 years, we slow the evolution of music by restricting the immediate improvement on current and popular musical forms

--Dilan Esper

(To find or answer this post, click here.)

(2/14)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
Weird cats.32/tp.jpg
Cartoonists' take on health care.32/tc.jpg
Night movers.98/td.jpg