Ad Report Card: Victoria's Explicit Campaign
Posted Monday, Nov. 12, 2001, at 3:58 PM ET
This Thursday night, ABC will present the first network broadcast of the notorious annual fashion show put on by Victoria's Secret, the maker of sexy underwear and assorted beauty products. The Disney-owned network will supplement this virtual infomercial with related quasi-advertising gambits such as a visit to the same lingerie show by characters on ABC's Spin City and a couple of Victoria's Secret models showing up on Who Wants To Be a Millionaire.
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponThe broadcast is expected to do well among males ages 18 to 24, and one can assume that demographic also enjoyed one of the most striking ads on television in recent weeks: a spot for Victoria's Secret itself. It's possible that some advertisers worry about overdoing the "sex sells" thing, but that appears not to be the case at Victoria's Secret—and perhaps if anyone can take that attitude, it's a lingerie company. If you haven't seen the ad, or if you're the sort of person who wants to watch it over and over and over again, you can view it here by way of AdCritic.com. Those of you who are determined to do more thorough research might also want to take the time to view a minutelong version of the spot: Go to Advertising Age's adreview.com site, where you'll have to register (click "Join"), then click "Search the Hot Spot archive" and search for "secret." It's a hassle, but I'm sure some will find the effort worthwhile. (If you're already registered at that site, this link should work.) AdCritic uses the QuickTime plug-in; the AdReview site uses the RealPlayer.
The ads: There isn't a lot to describe—or at least I'm not going to venture into thorough descriptions in a family publication like Slate. The ad consists of many, rapid-fire shots of extremely … healthy … women squirming and rolling and gyrating while wearing intimate apparel. This activity occurs in a variety of settings, such as candle-lit bedrooms, fully lit bedrooms, grand corridors, spacious bathrooms, and a couple of tables. Occasionally there's a guy present, as a barely noticeable prop. The music is the driving "Inertia Creeps," by Massive Attack, calling to mind a runway show—or perhaps a strip club.
And the secret is …? Not surprisingly, some viewers of this spot complain that it's little more than soft porn, that it looks like an ad for an escort service, and so on. Certainly there isn't a whole lot of "secret" involved in Victoria's immodest sales pitch, and in fact this ad is part of what's become probably the least subtle marketing strategy of all time.
Perhaps the ad, TV special, and assorted cross-promotions are overkill, or perhaps there's no such thing as too many underwear models. (Just to be clear, this column is not opposed to racy lingerie.) Victoria's Secret has been increasingly explicit in its courting of male consumers, and during a period when marketing wisdom has increasingly skewed toward the idea of pinpoint marketing, the chain has gone more and more mass in delivering its pitch. Victoria's Secret's marketers no doubt know that plenty of male gazers never actually buy anything. (Several years ago I knew a guy who was a very devoted fan of the catalogs but who also—go figure—was in the midst of an epic dating drought. Maybe he was buying lingerie anyway, but I'd rather not think about that.) Up to now I think the company has been more than happy to live with whatever collateral branding might occur among those who gawk but don't shop.
But its latest marketing push arrives at a ticklish time for Victoria's Secret. The chain, owned by Intimate Brands Inc., reported flat same-store sales in October and a decline in sales in the third quarter; its flashy and ubiquitous campaign arrives in a more subdued America than the one that existed prior to Sept. 11. Does someone need to tell the marketers at Victoria's Secret that, sometimes, less is more?
Nine Is So Weird, You Should Probably Go See It
How Will Michael Jackson's Death Change Music?
What Jenny Sanford Wrote in Obama's Facebook News Feed
The 12 Best Cheeses To Serve at Christmas
Oops—I Forgot I Was Piloting This Plane
Can You Believe What Joe Biden Said This Week?
Notes From The Fray Editor:
Ricky Moran says: "I just looked at the ad on adCritic. What's the question again?" Risus Sardonicus has his own take on the matter: "Compared with the style and products of the great French lingerie manufacturers, Victoria's Secret isn't sexy at all."
Comments:
Moneybox has it all wrong. The American public will realize that this commercial--er, I mean, program--is important to our troops' morale (that's the vital, 18-24-year-old male bracket, see?) And, even more important, it will be eagerly watched on satellite TV throughout fundamentalist Islamdom. Sure, a few wackos may be pushed over the edge, but millions will be drawn our way.
Die in a cave with Osama, or watch writhing, barely-clad models. It's psychological warfare so subtle that Moneybox thinks it's about selling underwear.
Out of gratitude for this selfless act of corporate patriotism, I'm going to go buy my wife a bunch of thongs and wonderbras. It's the American thing to do.
--A.G.Android
(To find or answer this post, click here.)
The Victoria's secret TV show is unlikely to have much appeal for men, and the network knows this. Victoria's Secret has had shows on cable E! and Style channels for some time, and I happened to take a look once. It didn't take long to see that there wasn't much there for men. The giveaway was the commercials: Tide, Tampax, etc., the same people that sponsor Oprah and Rosie. From my male point of view, the commercials utterly destroyed what little prurient interest the show could generate. I would be very surprised if there is a single beer or car commercial in the network version coming up this week. The marketing hope is that women will watch the fashion show to choose particular items to buy for themselves, or for their husbands or boyfriends to get for them. Anyway, that's how it would work in my house.
--Arthur Stock
(To find or answer this post, click here.)
(11/14)