the breakfast table
columns
- The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Should there be a shooting range next to the Supreme Court gift shop?
Walter Dellinger
posted June 27, 2008 - The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Was it ever Miller time?
Dahlia Lithwick
posted June 26, 2008 - What's the Big Secret?
Continuing the conversation.
Patrick Radden Keefe
posted Aug. 30, 2007 - A Supreme Court Conversation
Everything convservatives should abhor.
Walter Dellinger
posted June 29, 2007 - The Midterm Elections
The blame game, George Allen, and more.
Mark Halperin
posted Nov. 3, 2006 - Search for more the breakfast table articles
- Subscribe to the the breakfast table RSS feed
- View our complete the breakfast table archive
Slate staff members discuss the current crisis.
Bring Back Napalm
Posted Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2001, at 12:45 PM ET
Apocalypse Now Redux, rereleased with new scenes, is a classic fiction film. "I love the smell of napalm in the morning" is a popular phrase from the Francis Ford Coppola attraction. The only place you're likely to see or hear from napalm today is in the theater. Napalm is no longer part of our defense arsenal. View the gruesome scenes in Coppola's film to see why. Images of innocent life running from burning villages remain indelible.
I propose we debate revisiting the use of napalm as a wartime tool. It might be useful as we deal with the cave-dweller. Napalm is a highly effective weapon in cavernous territory. A splash across the horizon of the Hindu Kush is certain to dampen the ardor of Taliban fanatics as we suck the air out of their holes, suffocating them.
The debate is theoretical, of course, since the United States dumped its ability to produce napalm in the Carter era. We trashed napalm because it reminded us too much of the uncomfortable past in Vietnam. There was also an interpretation of the Geneva Convention that makes weapons using flame to kill illegal. Flame throwers disappeared, too, although they were used effectively to clear caves in World War II without significant condemnation.
So, the odds aren't in napalm's favor. In part, that's OK. Our Defense Department has another proven weapon at its disposal not subject to the international treaty. "Fuel-Air Explosives" were used against Iraq in 1991 to clear minefields and, among other things, asphyxiate hostile occupants. Unfortunately, FAEs won't instill the same fear as napalm could. FAEs are virtually invisible. I want our foe to see sunshine on the horizon.
Bring Back Napalm
Posted Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2001, at 12:45 PM ET
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: Two Feared Dead In Near-By Child-Birth
Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: To Be Sold - Two Chamber Pot House
Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
PostPartisan: The DebateRobinson | Punch, Counterpunch
Gerson: Two McCain SuccessesKing: Straight Out of a SitcomMeyerson: Old John
- Dionne: Who Is John McCain, Really?
- Ignatius: In Praise of Complete Sentences
- Parker: Wake Me When the Debate Starts
- Editorial: Their Pre-Meltdown Mind-Set
- Today's Headlines
- Wolffe: McCain’s Attacks Fall Short During Debate
Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:14:48 GMT - Pfizer Accused of Deception on Neurontin
Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:46:00 GMT - America’s ‘Lost Monarchy’: The Man Who Would Be King
Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:09:16 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- You Know Who Won, My Friends? That One
Wed, 8 October 2008 4:43:12 GMT - It Takes Green to Go Green
Tue, 7 October 2008 22:29:01 GMT - The Truth About Black Love
Tue, 7 October 2008 22:43:15 GMT - » More from The Root

the breakfast table













