the breakfast table
columns
- The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Should there be a shooting range next to the Supreme Court gift shop?
Walter Dellinger
posted June 27, 2008 - The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Was it ever Miller time?
Dahlia Lithwick
posted June 26, 2008 - What's the Big Secret?
Continuing the conversation.
Patrick Radden Keefe
posted Aug. 30, 2007 - A Supreme Court Conversation
Everything convservatives should abhor.
Walter Dellinger
posted June 29, 2007 - The Midterm Elections
The blame game, George Allen, and more.
Mark Halperin
posted Nov. 3, 2006 - Search for more the breakfast table articles
- Subscribe to the the breakfast table RSS feed
- View our complete the breakfast table archive
Nick Paumgarten and Lillian Ross
Back to Normal?
Posted Monday, Sept. 17, 2001, at 5:57 PM ETLillian,
Well, if that is what they mean by getting back to normal, then maybe we're better off not getting back to normal. Aspects of our way of life were perhaps worth attacking, apparently. If there's any upside to the World Trade Center disaster, it's that we will all be spared, for a few weeks anyway, all of this nonsense; the PR mill is quiet, or muted, at least.
So, today is getting-back-to-normal day here in New York. The stock market is open (and getting killed), the Yankees are playing (in Tampa), thousands are hard at work in borrowed offices. But things are not normal. According to the Times today, the federal government is asking the big securities firms (and, apparently, threatening reprisal should they not obey) to help buoy the stock market--to act not in their own interest, but in the country's. Odd, eh? I always kind of thought the pursuit of self-interest was what made this country great. Where are the free-market high priests on this one? It's as though to protect our way of life we need to abandon it. What if the feds had ordered the commissioner of Major League Baseball to make sure the Yankees won tonight in order to restore confidence? Well, anyway, it isn't working. The markets aren't listening. But what am I talking about? Who cares, at this hour, about a momentary perversion of this or that principle? We're just trying to get back to normal here.
Yours,
Nick
Back to Normal?
Posted Monday, Sept. 17, 2001, at 5:57 PM ETfeedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: To Be Sold - Rather Large Buttons
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: Ship's Log
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: Secret Society Of Free-Bakers Has Fail'd To Gain Influence
Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Over the LineHarold Ford Jr. | I know what it's like to be smeared by your opponent.
: The Positive in Negative Ads
- Robinson: A Little Worried About the Meltdown
- Khaled Hosseini: Sen. McCain, Am I a Pariah?
- Ombudsman: A Puff Piece About the Obamas?
- King: The Anatomy of an Assault
- Today's Headlines
- Can Pakistan Stay Afloat?
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:20:52 GMT - Florida: Will Palin Cost the GOP Jewish Voters?
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:07:56 GMT - Review: le Carre Novel Is Missing the Old Sparkle
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:41:29 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- An Obama-Palin Ticket
Thu, 9 October 2008 18:16:56 GMT - Love the Player, Hate the GM
Thu, 9 October 2008 21:10:07 GMT - Schooling McCain on the Man Code
Thu, 9 October 2008 20:03:04 GMT - » More from The Root

the breakfast table













