
The Noonday Demon: An Atlas of Depression
Dear Jim,
Where did you get the idea that I've "suffered nothing like the syndromes Solomon describes"? Louis MacNeice once wrote that the poet is a specialist in something (language) that everyone does. The depressive is a specialist in a kind of suffering that everyone has--or at least has a kernel of. Everyone will find a piece of himself in Solomon's account, even if he has been spared the experience of watching that kernel blossom into a monstrous and strangling plant.
At some point, though, there is a quantum leap. Solomon recalls crying so much his face became chapped. To people who haven't lived it, this big-d Depression is probably as unknowable as an acid trip or hand-to-hand combat. The line between depression and Depression is loss of control. Any person can feel really, really sad--as sad, worthless, and torpid as Solomon. But not as desperate. To the non-depressed, consolations/resolutions like There will be other girlfriends or I really ought to cut down on my drinking remain accessible and meaningful.
I once read an article by a Delta bluesman who talked about upper-middle-class whites who love the Blues without really knowing what the Blues are. "Their idea of a Blues song," he said (and I paraphrase), "is 'Woke-up-this-mornin'-felt-bad-so-I-gotta-get-outta-town-and-find-me-a-new-job-and-a-new-woman.' That's not the Blues. The Blues is not about options." Nor is Depression. Depression feels unfixable, and it feels like forever.
Let's talk about Solomon's frankness. Revealing one's bisexuality takes little courage for someone of his generation, particularly in the Ivy League/literary milieu he inhabits. His attempt to contract AIDS, as you mention, is memorable and bizarre (OK, insane), but we can place it under the rubric of passive suicidality. This seeking after experiences, states, and situations to match one's self-image is much more common in day-to-day, non-depressed life than we think. Revealing his tendency to violence--he quite recently trashed a girlfriend's apartment and broke a boyfriend's face--is a more genuinely humiliating matter.
But these pale next to Solomon's account of his mother's death, which is one of the most harrowing things I've ever read in a memoir. In the book's first pages, he tells us that his mother's death occasioned his first depressive episode. This rings like self-pity until, almost 300 pages in, we find out how she died. Diagnosed with a serious cancer, she committed suicide with an overdose of Seconal while her family watched. (Let me add in passing that this is where your curiosity about how Solomon gathered his material rose most readily to mind; I suspect the proceedings were tape-recorded.)
In the passages on his mother's death, we are clearly reading the fruits of psychotherapy. Solomon has come close to "solving" his depression. Here's how I read it: Solomon has trouble forming relationships. (Smashed glass and broken jawbones don't exactly recommend one to future partners.) The one relationship that has been like a rock to him is that with both his parents. His mother is his consolation in everything--work, love, making sense of life. He's surely not immune to the usual Oedipal conflicts, and now, at the very worst moment--around age 30, when he's a full-formed man but still has the youthful passions--he gets to join her in an act of unthinkable intimacy: to become her ally in her death. How could it but become the defining experience of his life?
I don't care how sick she was--or how willingly she died. If Freud is right about the repetition-compulsion (and he is), then every road to self-fulfillment for Solomon thenceforth led through the gates of death. That this is true for everyone involved becomes clear when Solomon recounts the eerie moment, a few weeks after his mother's death, when he and his father fought over the remaining Seconal.
Solomon takes consolation from the philosopher Ronald Dworkin: "Death has dominion," says Dworkin, "because it is not only the start of nothing but the end of everything, and how we think and talk about dying--the emphasis we put on dying with 'dignity'--shows how important it is that life ends appropriately, that death keeps faith with the way we have lived." What Promethean hubris. What delusions of existential grandeur. Why does Solomon defer to Dworkin here, when it is he who has the rare expertise in this brand-new kind of guilt?
Solomon shows bravery and rigor in digging down to these roots. "Assisted suicide is a legitimate way to die," he writes. "At its best it is full of dignity, but it is still suicide, and suicide is in general the saddest thing in the world. Insofar as you assist in it, it is still a kind of murder, and murder is not easy to live with." But even that is too consolatory. This account convinces me Solomon is wrong to call assisted suicide "a legitimate way to die." Legitimate for the person dying, maybe, but the evidence of this book is that it's not emotionally survivable for the accomplices.
Best,
Chris
Most Fast Food Restaurants Thrived During the Recession. Not Arby's.
Did Anti-Communists Really End Communism? Two Historians Say No.
Dear Farhad: How Does Facebook Know I'm Gay?
What Ever Happened to Hood Ornaments?
Are Doctors Allowed To Say They're Sorry?
Hitchens: Let's Not Get Sentimental About Communism













Reader Comments From The Fray:
[Notes from the Fray Editor: One line in the piece "The chemical fetishism of newsweekly readers--the scientific folklore that depression's relationship to low serotonin, say, is as straightforward as diabetes's to low blood sugar--richly deserves such a slap" got a lot of attention. A couple of readers talked about diabetes and depression, here and here, and Mangar also took issue, below. Cato the Censor was more interested in the idea of taking pride in depression: "Contracting tuberculosis, for example, would not be occasion for pride because Keats shared this disease." Some readers gave their personal stories, below and here.]
If the idea that there's something else to depression besides just chemicals was a radical idea, a refreshing slap in the face, then mental health would look a lot different. We would be seeing a slow invasion of counselors (who talk to people and work on changing their thinking) into a world dominated by psychiatrist (who generally prescribe and monitor medication). In fact, it's a damn sight harder to get 15 minutes with a psychiatrist than an hour with a counselor, and medication is generally considered a "good adjunct" or "facilitator" to the work of therapy. Sure, meds help, but you're not likely to find a good psychiatrist who doesn't prescribe a healthy dose of counseling along with their Zoloft.
I'm curious to see where the writers come from on their pending discussion of evolution and depression. I have yet to read a convincing argument about the "use" of depression in an evolutionary sense. I've read some perfectly preposterous ones in the meantime, such as the "superorganism" concept put forth by Howard Bloom in The Lucifer Principle.
--Mangar
(To reply, click here.)
I am one of those chronically depressed people who the author writes about. I've been depressed since childhood, have attempted suicide, seen dozens of therapists, battled drug addiction, and have been prescribed levels of anti-depressants that are listed as overdoses in the medical literature. So I qualify as depressed, and yet have no interest in reading this book.
There are several reasons for this. One of the hallmarks of depression is despair. We depressives do not go in for self-help books---why bother? Anecdotes about fellow sufferers are of no interest to me. The fact that other people are equally miserable does nothing to make me feel better. If anything, it makes me feel worse. Anyhow, in my case, I feel that discussions about depression are irrelevant. Born with a congenital bone disease that has left me dwarfish and deformed, I have never had a girlfriend (or boyfriend) and nobody wants to hire me, despite my job skills. Frankly, faced with a lifetime of loneliness, ridicule, poverty and misery, depression seems to be the only sane attitude to have. And I suspect that many other depressed people feel the same way.
--Steinmetz
(To reply, click here.)
In my case (45 years old and suffering increasingly severe bouts of depression since early childhood) there is absolutely a direct relationship between events of significant loss and major depression. I don't suggest or believe this is true for all depressed people, but it's the foundational element of my trouble. And one more thing, related: I can easily name for you the one overwhelming emotion, or feeling, or whatever you want to call the thing depression is/has been for me, and that's this: Terror. Pure, horrific, terror, so unrelievedly painful I would repeat to myself (during episodes, one as long as 10 months) "I just can't believe this is happening to me."
--Dian
(To reply, click here.)
(6/21)