The Beatles Anthology
Beatlemania: A Collective Sex Fantasy?
Posted Tuesday, Oct. 10, 2000, at 10:49 AM ETDear Erik,
I'm with you all the way on the matter of Paul's range. "Rocky Raccoon" is a terrific western song; "Honey Pie" is a (rather too campy) vaudeville tune; "P.S. I Love You" is maybe the greatest Latin American cha-cha ditty in the history of anglophone pop. But John has impressive range, too: His "Good Night" may be the only great lullaby written in this century.
My favorite Anthology story on John and Paul's collaboration concerns "Yesterday." Paul came by the melody in a dream but was fearful of recording it because he thought he might unconsciously have plagiarized it. So he left it in his head with the placeholder verses: "Scrambled eggs ... oh, my baby how I love your legs ... Ohhh, I believe ... in scrambled eggs." It was recorded by Paul and a bunch of session musicians with no other Beatle present. But many think of it as a John song.
Whoever wrote the stuff, though, the Beatles had a sense of what was good about them that was almost infallible. It's a rare gift, knowing when one is "on" artistically. There's a myth among pooh-poohers of the Beatles that it was the producing genius of George Martin that provided the Beatles' music with its distinctive texture. That myth doesn't survive a listening to this Anthology album. Martin has freshly mixed a lot of old tapes into the best-sounding new tracks he could, and virtually none of it is better than what went into the albums. Some of the misjudgments in rehearsal are almost astounding to hear: a saxophone solo on "Lady Madonna," for instance, or a version of "Penny Lane," that has ... what is it? a piccolo?--I don't have my liner notes with me--followed by a lot of "Piggies"-style wheezing and grunting.

Listen to audio
Lady Madonna

Listen to audio
Penny Lane
"Martha, My Dear" has always been one of my one or two favorite Beatles songs. I know better why that is after having read your smart laying-out of its merits. Up till now, I'd thought it was a matter of personal experience. I have a friend (not my most easygoing friend, I'll grant) who is the habit of saying, "Did you ever notice how all people named Adam are assholes?" In the same way, I have known so many deep-souled, generous-hearted people named Martha that I'd almost say that the best way to ensure your child grew up into a decent adult would be to name her that. I thought I liked the song because I liked Marthas.
This is just a way of explaining that I am absolutely unqualified to answer your question about the relative merits of Jerome Kern and Harold Arlen (both of whose songs delight me beyond words) and the Beatles. I took for granted as a younger man that I'd age and start listening to more classical music while popular music fell by the wayside--but that just hasn't happened. I like songs with nice melodies and moving or funny lyrics--rather as my Lawrence Welk Show-watching grandmother did. This is not to flee your question: Yes, I'd put the Beatles "up there" with the great American songwriters. But that doesn't mean I'd trade my Ella Fitzgerald Jerome Kern Songbook or my Lee Wiley Sings Harold Arlen for Abbey Road.
Still, there is one thing the Beatles do have that puts them in their own class. They have an instinctive sense for vocal sound (as opposed to mere lyrics) in a way that the Americans didn't. Listen to the very rough rehearsal of "Eight Days a Week," and you realize they're learning what they want the song to sound like not by saying "a little more bass on that one," but by just harmonizing ad hoc.

Listen to audio
Eight Days a Week
I think I can be clearer about my high regard for the Beatles musicianship if we can get to the generation business again. There's an odd moment in the middle of THIS book when John says of the Beatles' mad 1964 U.S. tour, "Our image was only a tiny part of us." To which anyone who watched that tour would reply, "Baloney." So would Mim Udovitch, who, in her excellent review of this book in last Sunday's New York Times book review, comes close to describing the Beatles obsession as a collective sex fantasy. All I can say is that stuff meant nothing to us as teen-agers when we were listening to the Beatles in the decade after their breakup. "Beatlemania" was no more comprehensible to me than was "tulipomania." Nor did we think of any of the Beatles as even cool in the slightest. We just liked listening to their music.
I've always liked the acoustic "Revolution" on the White Album, particularly the skip-in-the-record-emulating blues at the beginning and the "awhoah-shooby-doo-wah" harmonies. But it's kind of self-parodic, and I love the sound of George on the electric version. So I'm foursquare behind the single. But if we're baring our Beatles souls here, I don't think I can make any admission more revelatory than this one: I've never met anyone knowledgeable about the Beatles who considers "The Long and Winding Road" anything but groan-inducing dreck. I think it's quite a nice song.
Although I'm so tired, I'll have another cigarette,
Chris
Beatlemania: A Collective Sex Fantasy?
Posted Tuesday, Oct. 10, 2000, at 10:49 AM ET
This week, our Book Clubbers take on The Beatles Anthology. Click here to learn more about the critics and here to buy the book. Reader Comments from The Fray:
[Reaction to
Monday's entry:]
Solipsism, shmolipsism. It's heartening to note how much this bunch of boomers were affected by the Fab Four, and thought about them, and take the Paul vs. John weltenschaung, or the "Revolution" vs. "Revolution" posture. Under the influence of hormones and vast quantities of various pharmaceuticals around about 1970 I was sure the Beatles were aliens, among us with special knowledge to impart to the illuminati. But in that state I spent too much time trying to decipher the code in the moving letters in the fabric of my jeans.
The time changes and key changes and technical details were probably George Martin.
The angst was John.
The walrus was Paul.
Just enjoy it.
--Brian Levy
(To reply, click
here.)
You must learn about Liverpool: its status and impact on northern England, the impact of its history as a port city and shipyard center. These factors created a unique socio-economic environment for Liverpool, different from Manchester, different from Leeds. The Liverpool culture as it was in the 1950s helped shape the outlook of its youth, and the Beatles represent that cultural heritage. Starkey had the poorest upbringing, and Harrison the closest thing to middle class of any of them. Because of McCartney's closeness to his musical family extending before him, he is the most rooted in Liverpool's heritage of the embarkation point of American popular music into Britain, during the post-war era. Ask Paul about the music, that's what John would have said.
--Jono
(To reply, click
here.)
I enjoyed reading your exchanges here, and I agree that Rubber Soul, rather than Revolver, has plenty to offer in the way of Lennon/McCartney musical experimentation and maturity. But it had begun even earlier than that. Listen to Help and you'll notice a sudden departure from the purely simple boy-loves-girl stuff. Indeed, even different instrumentation such as the use of the sitar began to make its appearance there.
--Paul Splett
(To reply, click
here.)
Say what you want about John vs. Paul or Revolver vs. White but "Hamburg that most romantic of northern european cities"!!!!! Eh?!!!! Ever actually been to Hamburg? Must have been one helluva girl if you found it romantic! Try Copenhagen or Stockholm next time.
--simon warner
(To reply, clickhere.)
I just got back from four years in Hamburg and I totally disagree with you two. Hamburg is a beautiful city! Maybe you never got away from the Reeperban and surrounding St. Pauli district? I've never seen a city with so many parks and trees, the general architecture is elegant, there's a white sand beach along the Elbe, bicycle paths everywhere, there are more canals than in Venice and the bars never close ( I lost count of how many times I walked out of a bar into full daylight--not recommended).
--Maldwyn
(To reply, clickhere.)
In discussing the quality of "Martha My Dear" (definitely my favorite song on the White Album), Erik Tarloff mentions an effective rhythmic shift in the melody. I think it worth mentioning that unusual rhythms, phrasings, and chord progressions previously unknown, or at most little seen, in pop music were characteristic of the Beatles' songs from the beginning.
One of the first serious critical appreciations of the Beatles as songwriters was by the musicologist Deryck Cooke, who analyzed the phrasing in "Yesterday" (a McCartney song, of course) with great admiration for its creativity, originality, and imagination. (The essay is in Cooke's collection Vindications.)
I think this characteristic deserves to be mentioned along with the sheer beauty of the melodies and the breadth of the musical influences: The classical references Tarloff finds in "Penny Lane" and "Eleanor Rigby" were at least possibly and partially from George Martin, who arranged the guest instrumentalist parts of those songs, which I suspect are what's being referred to. But the melodies of the instrumental parts were evidently Paul's own, and the suggestions of instruments were at least partially his as well.
--Meriadoc
(To reply, clickhere.)
I agree with this posting. George Martin, who, unlike the Beatles, was musically literate, played a major role in plotting out and writing down the musical arrangements. But usually the ideas came from the original song writers (according to Martin, Paul was far more specific in his instructions than John, who tended toward the impressionistic). Thus, for example, Paul, having heard a Brandenberg Concerto on his car radio en route to the Abbey Road studio one day, requested a piccolo trumpet for "Penny Lane." On the other hand, the suggestion of a string quartet accompaniment for "Yesterday" came from Martin--this story is in The Beatles Anthology, the book under discussion, incidentally--but McCartney then sang some of the lines he wanted the individual strings to play.
I also agree that a certain harmonic freshness distinguished the Beatles' song writing from very early on, although it was certainly more venturesome in the later albums than their earlier efforts.
If you like the Deryck Cooke essay (did you know he's the same Deryck Cooke who prepared the performing version of Mahler's unfinished 10th symphony?), you should also check out a book by another British musicologist, Wilfred Mellers, called Twilight of the Gods. It has some very good material.
--Erik Tarloff
(To reply, clickhere.)
Another book must be mentioned when it comes to analyses of Beatles music: Revolution in the Head, by critic and Shostakovich biographer Ian MacDonald, much of which was over my head, especially the talk of harmonics. But it was enlightening even for those of us who slept through Music Appreciation (for instance, the simple comparison of Lennon's "horizontal" melodies with McCartney's "vertical" melodies).
Here's a variation on the "desert island" game that we used to play (and of which George Martin would approve): Edit the White Album down to a single LP. You then have the greatest Beatles album ever, bar none (wait--let me listen to Revolver one more time). For the record, "Martha, My Dear" makes my cut. And how about "I Will"--what a tune! Do you know that's Paul singing (not playing) the bass line? Stop me before I start blathering...
--cazzie
(To reply, click
here.)
A Fraygrant writes:
Before he was killed John did an interview with Playboy where he gave detailed opinions and the origins of nearly every Beatles song. Is this article available anywhere on the web?
Yeah, yeah, yeah. There are several, including
this one. But before you reach any conclusions about the authorship of Lennon-McCartney tunes, you should consult a book called Paul McCartney: Many Years From Now, which came out a few years ago. It's an odd, fascinating, sloppily-edited book, but at the heart of it are interviews Paul gave to a long-time friend (the book's author is Barry Miles). In these quotes, McCartney discusses the writing of every single tune they wrote, and gives a percentage breakdown on who did what. (He'll say, "That was maybe 60 percent mine, 40 percent John.") Sounds a little self-serving, but his assessments ring absolutely true. His memory seems quite clear, and he recalls little tidbits on the songwriting that support his case. Beatles fans (especially those dismissive of Paul) should read it because they'll learn a lot. (e.g., Paul wrote the tune for "In My Life," and it was Paul's tape-loop experimentation that produced the astonishing sound of "Tomorrow Never Knows." Hey, I love John, but it's time to give Sir Paul credit.
--Bill
(To reply, clickhere.)
[Reaction to
Tuesday's "Book Club"]
I always listen to the acoustic "Revolution" as a warmup to the electric take. It takes on a sort of Led Zeppelin dynamic, acoustic blues before the thunder erupts. And of all Beatles songs, this is the biggest eruption of them all. The guitars howl like the damned, the drums 'n bass lock in thundering goose-step, and Lennon sounds righteously pissed off. If I was in a band I'd cover it that way too. Open with the acoustic shuffle and harmonies and then split some skulls wide open going electric. But then maybe I've listened to too much Led Zeppelin.
--Jerol
(To reply, click
here.)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- [video] Precocious Youngster Sells Cookies To Buy Attack Ad
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:25:38 -0400 - [audio] Columbian Bio-Engineers Create Gun-And-Drugs Tree
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:00:28 -0400 - Election Blog: Bloody 'ell! Voter Registration Deadlines Are Nearly 'ere!
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:09:18 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Imagine if...Hiatt | What if McCain had waged his campaign based on respect?
Editorial: Meddlesome PalinKing: The Danger of Palin Power
- Telnaes Animation: Bush Ponders His Legacy
- Editorial: The World's Expectations for Obama
- Dionne: The Rebirth of American Capitalism
- Samuelson: The Real Engine of Mayhem
- Today's Headlines
- The Economy: What We Need Is Leadership
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:39:13 GMT - Samuelson: The Engine of Mayhem
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:15:23 GMT - Cars: GM-Chrysler Merger Would Be A Lemon
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:51:58 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Iyanla's House
Mon, 13 October 2008 14:08:07 GMT - Ready to Rumble
Mon, 13 October 2008 18:41:28 GMT - Letter From North Carolina
Fri, 10 October 2008 18:50:36 GMT - » More from The Root

the book club













