the breakfast table
columns
- The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Should there be a shooting range next to the Supreme Court gift shop?
Walter Dellinger
posted June 27, 2008 - The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Was it ever Miller time?
Dahlia Lithwick
posted June 26, 2008 - What's the Big Secret?
Continuing the conversation.
Patrick Radden Keefe
posted Aug. 30, 2007 - A Supreme Court Conversation
Everything convservatives should abhor.
Walter Dellinger
posted June 29, 2007 - The Midterm Elections
The blame game, George Allen, and more.
Mark Halperin
posted Nov. 3, 2006 - Search for more the breakfast table articles
- Subscribe to the the breakfast table RSS feed
- View our complete the breakfast table archive
Marjorie Garber and Erik Tarloff
Proust's Admonition, Revisited
Posted Thursday, Sept. 14, 2000, at 4:05 PM ETProfessor Marge,
Having once been accused of writing a roman à clef when I did not, I'd probably be making a major-league mistake to go ahead and actually do it now. Such a thing might be taken as retrospective confirmation of some very nasty and quite offensive speculation. Besides, one of the great frustrations for a writer of fiction--an inventor of stories, after all--is the automatic supposition that he or she is raiding the quotidian details of his or her own life for material. There are such writers, of course, including some very distinguished ones, but following that narrative strategy seems to me to shortchange a vital part of what we bring to our work: our imaginations.
In addition, it's useful to bear in mind Proust's admonition to liars, which applies equally well to novelists (Plato, after all, banned poets from his Republic on the grounds that they were, of necessity, liars). Proust suggests that the reason most liars get found out is that they try to incorporate as much of the truth as possible into their lie, thereby compromising the artistic integrity of the lie and in the process rendering it less convincing.
So ... my next novel will be entirely made up. No truth for me. Truth makes fiction dishonest.
This has been a very enjoyable experience and a lovely way to renew our acquaintance. Plus, I haven't had to send you monthly checks.
Erik
Proust's Admonition, Revisited
Posted Thursday, Sept. 14, 2000, at 4:05 PM ETReader Comments From the Fray:
As for why women like Gore and men Bush? Simple: Romance and Presents. A big kiss for the wife, free pre-school for the kids and free medicine for Gramps. Gore's the national dream husband. Meanwhile, the men of America put their hands on their wallets which have just become perceptibly lighter, and furrow their collective brow as they tot up the trillions in taxes for the aforementioned goodies. Pikers! Don't they love their wives? How can they begrudge them the important things in life, paramount among them the free time to sit on the couch and watch Gore on Oprah? Gore's next initiative: a national program of heart-shaped chocolate boxes.
--Josh May
(To reply, click
here.)
[Note from the Fray Editor: Hmm. That should go down well in The Fray. So, we are sure, will Tek's view that gravitas, like penetration, is male. Other ideas:]
Thanks Marge. You didn't mention reparations [see last week's
Breakfast Table] and you got in the obligatory digs at George W. Bush. You have gravitas. Big time.
--WillV
(To reply, click
here.)
The last female politician to have "gravitas" was Margaret Thatcher. She didn't care whether or not she was part of the old boy network. She did not sit around and whine about the glass ceiling. She did not toe the liberal/socialist line or care whether or not people loved her. She ignored all the experts, and just went with what she believed in and to hell with the polls.
--Dean W.
(To reply, click
here.)
The gender gap is due to gun control.
I can't tell you how many working/middle class white men I've heard that say something like "I'm pissed with the Democrats that they keep making me vote Republican, but I strongly believe in the second amendment." For women (and men) who support or don't mind gun control, it's not a voting issue, because no one believes gun control will substantially reduce violence. And what's most irritating to this yellow-dog Dem is that actual steps Dems take are not that threatening, even if you are strongly against gun control. It's merely the rhetoric about "taking on the NRA" etc etc which is driving away working class white men in droves.
What's annoying to me is how the media is ignoring the issue. Media people will talk about the kiss, empathy, social programs (men don't want health care and education?), the Mommy vs. Daddy party, blah blah, but are completely oblivious to this particular 900 pound gorilla. And the polls don't ask questions on gun control either, so no-one sees how big (or small) its effect is. I find the combination of media obtuseness on gun control combined with endless (uninsightful) analysis on the gender gap really pretty irritating.
And Ms Williams, if you believe Wen Ho Lee was being railroaded, how come you haven't written any columns on it? Or on the fraudulent Cox report?
--Roublen Vessau
(To reply, click
here.)
[Note from the Fray Editor: probably because she's actually Marjorie Garber. Marjorie Williams is over at Slate's Book Club.]
Erik, your story about Washington's steely (not wooden) character is true in essence, except it was Mad Anthony Wayne boasting after a cavalry skirmish that he was afraid of nothing in this world. Hamilton then gestured to Washington, who had just entered the room and was warming himself at the fireplace. "Go, then, and clap our general on his back, and hail him as a good fellow," said Hamilton. "No, I think I will decline the honor," replied Wayne.
Many share your outrage about Wen Ho Lee. Can you see why we reprehensible unreconstructed conservatives are always in such an uproar about the left's perpetual ambition to increase the power and reach of the Federal government? And I agree that the ACLU is a useful organization, though they should be admonished to change their name to the American Civil Liberties- Except-for-a-Phrase-in-Amendment-One-a-Clause-in-Amendment-Two-and-All-of-Amendment-Ten Union. Truth in advertising, you know.
--Aristophanes
(To reply, click
here.)
[This is the post mentioned by Erik Tarloff in Monday's entry.]
(9/11)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: A Jest For You
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: Hay Thieves Strike Again
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: John Jacob Astor Out Looking For Beaver
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
PostPartisan: The DebateRobinson | Punch, Counterpunch
Gerson: Two McCain SuccessesKing: Straight Out of a SitcomMeyerson: Old John
- Dionne: Who Is John McCain, Really?
- Ignatius: In Praise of Complete Sentences
- Parker: Wake Me When the Debate Starts
- Editorial: Their Pre-Meltdown Mind-Set
- Today's Headlines
- Economic Crisis: Europe's Response
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:43:06 GMT - What America's Smartest Women Say About Sarah Palin
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:46:41 GMT - Personal Finance: Conservative Investing
Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:53:19 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- An Obama-Palin Ticket
Thu, 9 October 2008 18:16:56 GMT - Love the Player, Hate the GM
Thu, 9 October 2008 21:10:07 GMT - Schooling McCain on the Man Code
Thu, 9 October 2008 20:03:04 GMT - » More from The Root

the breakfast table













