Slate's Bizbox




the breakfast table: An e-mail conversation about the news of the day.

David D. Kirkpatrick and Jamie Heller

from: Jamie Heller

The Real-Estate Broker Conspiracy

Posted Tuesday, May 23, 2000, at 1:59 PM ET

David,

It certainly sounds like you know your stuff. And frankly, as someone who just went to contract on an apartment, that's what terrifies me. Your dream as a home seeker is my nightmare as a recent buyer. But I agree, I'm afraid it's likely to come true.



What amazes me is how far behind the media are on this story. The only publication I've seen even take a stab at it is the New York Observer. Everyone else seems swayed by the brokers who, as mentioned, work for the sellers. The brokers have every interest in maintaining the hottest real-estate market around, as it generates higher commissions for them.

I remember looking at apartments the weekend after the brutal Friday sell-off a ways back. I kept asking the brokers, "How is this affecting the market?" Their response: "Not at all." It was eerie. Like they were all in cahoots, on the Truman Show or something.

Then, when journalists use these brokers as sources, it simply perpetuates the perception--to the detriment of folks like us.

As for the TSC/Fox sitch, let me remind you that I'm employed by the former. I can think of more career enhancing things to do than to comment about it at "The Breakfast Table."

Jamie

from: Jamie Heller

The Real-Estate Broker Conspiracy

Posted Tuesday, May 23, 2000, at 1:59 PM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
David D. Kirkpatrick is a contributing editor at New York magazine who writes frequently about business and finance. Jamie Heller is editor for strategic ventures at TheStreet.com, where she's worked since its 1996 founding.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Reader Response from The Fray--to be read after the most recent entry:


I still don't understand how the stock market can be efficient in the long term and not the short run. And I'm not relying merely on Keynes' famous sentiments about the long run; my point is even simpler: when is the long run? Was Microsoft's long run value from 1990 to early 2000 or to today? Short run volatility must have consequences for people who claim long run efficiency. To my mind, and for many other reasons, believing in efficient markets is like believing in Santa Claus--there are correlations between expected results and reality, but people really ought to grow up and accept that no-one on Wall Street knows anything.

--Jeff

(To reply, click here.)

(5/22)

To Jeff: Various natural processes are long-term efficient without being short-term efficient, for example the downhill flow of water or the process of natural selection (aka evolution). Complex human processes seem to have similar behavior. Perhaps efficient is being confused with "optimal". The problem with most strategies that attempt to be optimal is that they often have truly horrendous failure cases, which wipe out all their interim or theoretical gains. Democracy has been called "the worst form of government, except for all the rest." It is hardly optimal, and in many cases very inefficient. A dictator could get the graffiti cleaned up and the trains running on time; democracy seems to have a hard time doing such things. But what about the failure case of a less-than-benign dictator or a dictator whose benign intentions diverge from many or most of the desires of the population? An example of short-term efficiency vs. long-term, in terms of human happiness.

That's not to say short-term efficiency is bad, or that we can't improve on raw systems. But it is possible for a strategy to be the best long-term one without exhibiting short-term efficiency.

--Paul Canniff

(To reply, click here.)

(5/23)





Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Topic A: Obama's Speech
| Pundits and diplomats respond.
Robinson: Sunshine in BerlinToles: The World ?'s ObamaTelnaes: Meanwhile, McCain