
David Frum and Danielle Crittenden
"Amen!" from this corner! And for once you will be the recipient of frothing feminist mail for that "chunky appearance" remark. I'll make this one brief, because I now have a thousand things to do if I'm to have, uh, your martini and slippers ready by 5.
I don't know if you saw the tiny Page 2 item (again in the Washington Times) about the new report from the Department of Education showing girls outpacing boys on practically every front from preschool to college. They are more ready to read in nursery school and suffer fewer developmental problems through grade school. More of them take advance placement tests in high school and more enroll in college. Boys apparently still do better at math and science (confirming "Talking Barbie's" shrewd observation that "Math is tough!"). The announcement of these results coincides aptly with the publication of Christina Hoff Sommers superb new book, The War Against Boys. Sommers makes mincemeat of educators and academics who insist that girls are suffering in school because of sexism and discrimination. Nonetheless, because of this utterly unfounded belief, schoolboys everywhere are being squelched by grim schoolmarms when they are not being subdued by Ritalin. I especially enjoyed Sommers' dissection of Carol Gilligan, one of the chief proponents of this girls-are-drowning theory, whose "research" has never been published or open to peer review but is kept locked away in Harvard filing cabinets.
Anyway, this exchange with you has been a lot of fun, although I'm looking forward to when we can get back to our usual e-mails: the ones that consist of me nagging you electronically while you pretend you're not there. Right sweetheart? David? David??












Is It More Important for Your Turkey To Be Organic or Local?
Why Gift Cards Are a Terrible Gift
Is Sarah Palin's Approval Rating Really as High as Barack Obama's?
Justice Scalia's Most Eccentric Habits
Adam Lambert's Refreshing Non-Apology on the CBS Early Show
Democrats Have a Lot To Be Thankful For
Reader Response from The Fray--to be read after the most recent entry:
It's early in the morning, yes, but I'm confused. If I read Ms Crittenden correctly, she is being a little bit pissy about Hillary Clinton using both her married name and her maiden name by referring to her as "Hillary Rodham-Not-Clinton". [Wednesday's entry] But of course Ms Clinton does use "Clinton," though, in her current Senate race, she is not making a big deal of it. Ms Crittenden, however, does not appear to use the name "Frum" at all. But she does--correct me if I am wrong here--advise other women to use their married names. Now, if I read her correctly, she is making fun of Hillary Clinton who does what Crittenden says women should do when, in fact, Crittenden does not. I'm sure there's an excellent explanation for this. Wouldn't now be an ideal time to let us in on the secret?
--Eric Alterman
(To reply, click here.)
(5/11)