David Frum and Danielle Crittenden
Well, since we're contributing these first items to the "Breakfast Table" sometime after 2 in the afternoon, we've avoided the toughest part of the C-SPAN experience. And really, ours was nowhere near as scary as it can get. I think the very worst befell our friend Jonathan Rauch. He was on Washington Journal to boost his book on the ossification of American government, Democracy's End. It's an important book about which Jonathan can speak eloquently--but not that morning. It was, you see, Vice Presidents' Week on C-SPAN, and every time Jonathan worked up a good burst of speed on his book, the interviewer would stop him to flash onto the screen a photograph of a man in a beard and a frock coat. "Can you identify this one?" "Um no," Jonathan would have to say. "It's Garret A. Hobart, William McKinley's first vice president. Can you tell us a little about him?" "Um no," Jonathan would say again. Ninety more seconds on his book--this time with a noticeably frantic edge to his voice, as if he hoped that by speaking urgently enough he could thwart any further interruptions. Suddenly: "And who's this?" "No idea," Jonathan had to confess glumly. "It's Daniel D. Tompkins, who served under President James Monroe. Let's do one more before we take some calls ..."
PRINT
DISCUSS
E-MAIL
RSS
RECOMMEND...
Facebook
MySpace
Mixx
Digg
Reddit
del.icio.us
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Sphere
StumbleUponI have to register a protest, though, at your first posting. You are cunningly introducing yourself to the readers of Slate as a cheerful media amateur, when in fact you and I know that while all of my political predictions always turn out wrong ("Well, I think Phil Gramm is a very electable candidate ..."), yours always turn out right to the percentage point. Which brings me to something that we probably should mention, which is that we're filing these exchanges from opposite sides of the continent: I'm inside the Beltway (and therefore by definition out of touch with the real America), while you are in Los Angeles, keeping your fingers on the pulse of the country's true capital: Hollywood.
Is Hasan a Terrorist? And Other Great Stories From Slate This Week.
How Sarah Palin Is Dividing the Republican Party
Can We Apply the Lessons of Y2K to Swine Flu?
They Made a Movie About the Wrong Aviatrix
Jamie Foxx's New Single Is Extremely Lewd
The Week's Best Editorial Cartoons
Reader Response from The Fray--to be read after the most recent entry:
It's early in the morning, yes, but I'm confused. If I read Ms Crittenden correctly, she is being a little bit pissy about Hillary Clinton using both her married name and her maiden name by referring to her as "Hillary Rodham-Not-Clinton". [Wednesday's entry] But of course Ms Clinton does use "Clinton," though, in her current Senate race, she is not making a big deal of it. Ms Crittenden, however, does not appear to use the name "Frum" at all. But she does--correct me if I am wrong here--advise other women to use their married names. Now, if I read her correctly, she is making fun of Hillary Clinton who does what Crittenden says women should do when, in fact, Crittenden does not. I'm sure there's an excellent explanation for this. Wouldn't now be an ideal time to let us in on the secret?
--Eric Alterman
(To reply, click here.)
(5/11)