the breakfast table
columns
- The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Should there be a shooting range next to the Supreme Court gift shop?
Walter Dellinger
posted June 27, 2008 - The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Was it ever Miller time?
Dahlia Lithwick
posted June 26, 2008 - What's the Big Secret?
Continuing the conversation.
Patrick Radden Keefe
posted Aug. 30, 2007 - A Supreme Court Conversation
Everything convservatives should abhor.
Walter Dellinger
posted June 29, 2007 - The Midterm Elections
The blame game, George Allen, and more.
Mark Halperin
posted Nov. 3, 2006 - Search for more the breakfast table articles
- Subscribe to the the breakfast table RSS feed
- View our complete the breakfast table archive
Malcolm Gladwell and Wendy Kaminer
The New New York Times
Posted Tuesday, June 9, 1998, at 2:36 PM ETYes, that is the striking thing about physics. Sometimes it seems like physicists and mathematicians are really the last intellectuals who get to use beauty as a criteria for assessing the value of knowledge. (I once wrote a story about the discovery of the largest known prime--or some such breakthrough--and I phoned a prominent mathematician and told him the number and he paused--the way you would pause before a really beautiful painting--and said "yes, that IS a large number!") By contrast, a lot of other scientific knowledge is awfully messy. I've always found one of the great frustrating things about writing about medicine is that the net effect of breakthroughs is always to complicate. Why can't there only be one kind of cholesterol, for example? Why are there are seven (or is it eight now?) different kinds of herpes viruses? Every now and again, when I was growing up, I would listen to my father, who is a mathematician, talk to someone in a different profession and he would ask question after question after question, fruitlessly trying to boil it all down to something elegant. The point, I suppose, is that elegant science and messy science don't really have a lot in common, which is why it's a bit strange sometimes that both of them get lumped together in places like "Science Times". I'm waiting for the Times to completely reorganize itself along more logical lines, and put politics and Hollywood stuff together, music and math together, sports and foreign news together, and put Frank Rich in one of those little agate type advertisements on the bottom of the front page.
The New New York Times
Posted Tuesday, June 9, 1998, at 2:36 PM ETfeedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: Opera Lyrics Blamed For Recent Spate Of Regicides
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: M. Webster's New "Dictionary" Shall Burden Us With A Tyranny Of Words
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:16:40 -0400 - Historical Archives: Benedict Arnold Is A Modern Day's Anthony Babington
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:33:20 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Marcus | Forget Biden. I'd like to see McCain face off against Palin.
Toles: Another McCain SurpriseStumped: Where's Palin's Baby?
- Cohen: How an Economic Crisis Is Like a War
- Froomkin: How's Bush? Put a Fork in Him.
- Milbank: A House Divided Along Twisted Lines
- Robinson: Ugly Politics at Justice | Q&A
- Today's Headlines
- For Kids, No Escape From Porn Imagery
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:50:54 GMT - Are Minorities to Blame for the Subprime Mess?
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:58:57 GMT - The Candidates' Own Questionable Housing Deals
Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:40:05 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Home Court Disadvantage
Tue, 7 October 2008 3:02:44 GMT - I Felt Something
Tue, 7 October 2008 2:43:10 GMT - The MILFy Way
Tue, 7 October 2008 1:43:56 GMT - » More from The Root

the breakfast table













